It's about 50 years ago since I wrote Jol, the replacement or
enhancement language for JCL. And it's my birthday, so I thought I might
say a word or two.
One of the reasons I wrote Jol was to incorporate PL/I style IF's into
the language. And to generally simply the whole JCL process.
Now,
Mark,
Please open a Case against ServerPac. It is possible that your order, if it
had gone through the manual entitlement process, could have been switched.
This would have been an error that the Service folks can verify and fix.
Thanks.
Marna WALLE
z/OS Install and Upgrade
IBM
Hello Claude,
A1: it is likely that you did not put SGRBLPA in the LPALST. Please see *all*
the RMF parmlib, proclib, and security considerations associated with the RMF
restructure in z/OS V2.5 in the z/OSMF V2.5 Upgrade Workflow, step called "RMF:
Determine updates for RMF structural
Glad I could be of some help.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
ste...@copper.net
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 3:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SCRT Question -- Group in =P5==
Bob:
Thank you for that tip. After checking a few
Classification: Confidential
CEE.SCEERUN and CEE.SCEERUN2 in LNKLSTxx?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Shaffer, Terri
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 9:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: TN3270 message
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside
You can query any element with SMP to determine where it is located.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Richbourg, Claude
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 4:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS 2.5 and RMF - plus the migration
On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:06:32 +, Richbourg, Claude
wrote:
>Good afternoon everyone,
>
>Two things that I noticed with z/OS 2.5 so far and I have a couple of
>questions for the group.
>
>Q1:
>RMF would not start after the first IPL of z/OS 2.5.
>The program ERBMFMFC is not in the
Hi Steve,
>> ...[I] am trying to figure out what
>> is meant in the SCRT "P5" section (Product Max Contributors)
>> *when* the entry for z/OS V2 shows each LPAR of the CEC (running
>> z/OS and part of the same group) all have 0 for MSUs and then the
>> GROUP entry (line total area) has 1500
A grasp at straws, but make sure the INPUT data does not contain data in
column 72 onward (mostly it would be line numbers).
On 11/15/2021 5:55 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
Does anyone know what the heck I should be looking for on this?
A customer running the z/OS FTP client is attempting to
This makes no sense.
1. The Server FTPD specifies ANONYMOUSLEVEL 1
2. I have no idea what the client FTPD specifies, but ANONYMOUSLEVEL is a
server-only configuration statement.
3. There should be no "anonymous" anywhere in this picture. The first
statement in the INPUT data set is USER userid
Thanks. Good thought. The file is machine-generated by software that generally
works so that seems unlikely. I don't *think* it is even getting up to the USER
statement, because that should come after the 220 message, but I am grasping at
straws here too.
Charles
-Original Message-
I opened a Case against ShopZ. I saw that somewhere on ShopZ that is what
I should have done.
It was a real treat trying to convince Support that ShopZ was a real
thing. :)
Then 7 failed attempts at sending an email with a link to update my Support
record. None of which I could open.
Finally
Thank you.
I'll look them up.
Meanwhile, at this shop, I have no idea who runs the SCRT report.
I just know which network drive and folder to find it.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
On 11/16/21 10:09 AM, Edward King wrote:
Hi Steve,
...[I] am trying to figure out what
is meant in the SCRT "P5"
I was notified of a build issue with the z/OSMF build for z/OS 2.5.
The first order I placed was missing several components in my order list, the
second one (the redo) was the one they told me would be delayed while they
fixed the z/OSMF build process.
However, when I placed my redo order, I
14 matches
Mail list logo
