Dan, no worries. You can't do that in dialog test 7.2. You have to use 7.1 and
launch your driver rexx or program. As I previously mentioned display the panel
with a panel name and then drop into a display loop without the panel name. The
link I sent you wrt panel reinitialization has a flow
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 14:36:57 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 13:15:29 -0600, John McKown wrote:
The translation set up with the site command is for both the PUT and GET
commands. At the time of issuance, the ftp process does not know which you
will do. So every IBM-1047 code point
Shmuel Metz wrote:
With a dialup connection, a POP3 client is a much more convenient way
to read e-mail than a web interface; I can work offline.
So…all the more reason that one would expect relevant, non-repetitive responses.
And why are you using dialup in 2013? Windows 3.1?
Peter,
I just ran into a customer issue using LE Cobol and I *think* it applies to C.
We run amode(31) rmode(any) ..customers run options were all31(off) and stack(
,,,below,,) .
We were getting S0c4-11, we couldn't reproduce it until we examined their ripen
options against ours line by line
Thank you Dave.
The light finally went on.
Looping to invoke the DISPLAY without a panel name allows the user to
update as many fields as necessary (with no scrollable area repositioning)
until they hit END (or CANCEL).
IBM is looking into the fact that DOWN FRED leaves FRED on the command
On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 08:52:28 -0600, Bill Godfrey wrote:
ftp quote site mbdataconn=(IBM-1047,UTF-8)
200 SITE command was accepted
ftp get foocopy
local: foocopy remote: foocopy
...
557 Data contains codepoints that cannot be translated
It would have worked if you had also used this
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 01:03
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFSORT Weirdness
That's just crazy talk. While there might be some load balancing
related
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1II13495
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Roberto Halais
roberto.hal...@gmail.com wrote:
We had a similar situation and ended coding the sort parms:
EXPOLD=0
EXPMAX=50%
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get
The point I was making about crazy talk was to dispel the notion that was
presented in two posts that ASM takes the size of the smallest data set, and
uses only that amount in larger data sets. That is an incorrect notion. ASM is
quite willing to use all of the slots in any page data set
Paul Gilmartin wrote
breaks commonly used conventions or newer HLASM functions
(e.g. SETRP),
Can you be more specific?
It's pretty likely that SETRP did not break anything (unless it was 30
years ago). I could easily believe that some things might not work with
newer HLASM functions (but I'm
Sorry, Paul G, I didn't mean to make you the subject of my post :-(
I need a take it back button...
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On 2 March 2013 20:16, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Paul Gilmartin wrote
breaks commonly used conventions or newer HLASM functions
(e.g. SETRP),
Actually Iwrote that bit, so putting Paul in the subject line was even
worse... :-)
Can you be more specific?
I'm at home, so not as
In
ofad40972b.2f224bfe-on85257b21.005f5b59-85257b21.00638...@us.ibm.com,
on 03/01/2013
at 01:07 PM, Jim Mulder d10j...@us.ibm.com said:
My understanding from folklore is that the REFR attribute predates
MVS, and its purpose was to designate modules for which a new copy
of the module could be
I recall distinctly the hardware having fetch protection but there being no
apparent OS support for it.
Charles
Composed on a mobile: please excuse my brevity
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+...@patriot.net wrote:
In
ofad40972b.2f224bfe-on85257b21.005f5b59-85257b21.00638...@us.ibm.com,
on
On 3/2/2013 5:50 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
Fair enough. But I think of my code as including those documented
and common IBM macros. If I have to choose between not using SETRP and
giving the assembler enough info to help diagnose some of my finger
checks, well of course I have to use SETRP.
In
b870629719727b4ba82a6c06a31c291239b4928...@hqmailsvr01.voltage.com,
on 03/02/2013
at 08:51 AM, Phil Smith p...@voltage.com said:
And why are you using dialup in 2013? Windows 3.1?
I don't do windoze.
You're welcome.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2
16 matches
Mail list logo
