Class C3 commands are ordinary attached commands that run in the CONSOLE
address space .
Such as Route commands
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:01 PM, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.plwrote:
W dniu 2014-02-24 01:14, baby eklavya pisze:
Hello ,
Any idea why MVS class C3 commands take so long
Ok this for ROUTE Command in CONSOLE.. it would vary from shop to shop and
time depends upon the configuration.(CONSOLxx).
So in your Shop, how long does it takes ?
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:58 PM, baby eklavya baby.ekla...@gmail.comwrote:
Class C3 commands are ordinary attached commands that
baby eklavya wrote:
Any idea why MVS class C3 commands take so long to execute .
While I see it is probably ROUTE command, where is 'class C3' documented?
It seems like console address space can't process more than 50 commands at a
time . We had to clear the command
queue often to relieve the
The issue is not how to invoke DFSORT thru rexx - LINKMVS works fine (though
it is sad that DFSORT does not support the alternate DDNAME parameter).
I wish to sort all dsnames that fit pattern prefix.Dyyymmdd.Thhmmss. As these
are not GDG's, JCL alone will not do the job. I need step (1), find
You got it, though I was referring to standard non-compiled rexx.
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 22:51:27 -0600 Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net wrote:
:Hi:
:
:Maybe I am misunderstanding the original op statement.
:I *THOUGHT* that the original op was doing :
: sort field=(1,5,ch,a)
: sort
We submitted a batch job having around 60 - 70 vary commands routed to 3
LPARS using COMMAND statement and we saw that the commands were queued up
for long . A display of GRS contention showed that there was a system level
enq on SYSZMCS by the console address space . The route commands were
It is documented in MVS system Commands manual - under Command Flooding
section
http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r12/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.zos.r12.ieag100%2Fiea2g1b134.htm
We dont have any exits in place to handle commands . But the manuals states
only 50 commands can run in
Can you share your Contention output ? How long is it happening ? Recently
?
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:50 PM, baby eklavya baby.ekla...@gmail.comwrote:
It is documented in MVS system Commands manual - under Command Flooding
section
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:06:11 +0200, Gadi wrote:
Hi,
I need to convert a customized binary version of a TCP/IP translation table to
the source version.
Is there a way to do this?
I know that the CONVXLAT program will do the reverse.
Thanks
Gadi
If it is an SBCS table named
ISG343I 17.28.56 GRS STATUS 866
S=SYSTEM SYSZMCS ROUTE-GROUP--CNID
SYSNAMEJOBNAME ASID TCBADDR EXC/SHRSTATUS
SYSP CONSOLE0009 00775078 EXCLUSIVEOWN
SYSP CONSOLE0009 00785400 EXCLUSIVEWAIT
SYSP CONSOLE
This looks to be similar to your issue :
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA18994
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 4:02 PM, baby eklavya baby.ekla...@gmail.comwrote:
ISG343I 17.28.56 GRS STATUS 866
S=SYSTEM SYSZMCS ROUTE-GROUP--CNID
SYSNAMEJOBNAME ASID TCBADDR
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:15:07 +1100 Wayne Bickerdike wayn...@gmail.com wrote:
:ASM to PL/I should be quite simple.
:PL3 becomes FIXED DEC(3,0) etc.
Not (5,?) ?
:CL6 becomes CHAR(6),
:
:BL1 becomes BIT(8) (I think)
:
:
:
:
:On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Ron Thomas ron5...@gmail.com
baby eklavya wrote:
ISG343I 17.28.56 GRS STATUS 866
S=SYSTEM SYSZMCS ROUTE-GROUP--CNID
SYSNAMEJOBNAME ASID TCBADDR EXC/SHRSTATUS
SYSP CONSOLE0009 00775078 EXCLUSIVEOWN
SYSP CONSOLE0009 00785400 EXCLUSIVEWAIT
Hmm,
In
aa6ff5ba011f44418bf62c515f71757d21bed...@ch2wpexch1.na.ds.ussco.com,
on 02/21/2014
at 07:58 PM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com said:
We think we have a diagnosis; waiting for the programmer to
compile/link the suggested change and verify operation. If resolved,
I'll post the diagnosis we
Rats, sorry. Meant for assembler-list.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
The DSECTs have improved greatly in recent years, but the executed
macro-language statements are often plain wrong,
Examples, please?
We're unlikely to correct something that we don't know is broken.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
SLR R0,R0
IC R1,0(,R1)
CHI R1,=H'13'
BNE ...
Ignoring that this is lousy code (unless, perhaps, the value is looked at
again, in which case having it in a reg could be advantageous), I hope
that this was a slightly incomplete snippet, or a typo; R1 needs to be
zeroed for the IC/CHI, not
It's not perfect (I see the lowercase letter e between the entries), but it's
something I can work with.
Thanks.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bill Godfrey
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 12:26 PM
To:
Hi Mike,
i think you have 2 basic problems.
The first is that primary days in your mgmtclas definition is set to blank,
and as far as hsm is concerned, the default is 2 days if there is no entry.
Which leads onto the second problem, and it looks like your job scheduler
allocates but does not
Out of curiosity, exactly where do you see the lowercase letter e? Is it on a
separate line, or between the hex numbers on each line? Or are you referring to
the file produced by CONVXLAT?
I tested it with TCIP.STANDARD.TCPXLBIN, and it looks ok on my system. I also
ran CONVXLAT with the
I see the e in the first character on every line and then between each pair of
hex characters
The first line looks like this:
e00e01e02e03e37e2De2Ee2Fe16e05e25e0Be0Ce0De0Ee0F
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com wrote:
SLR R0,R0
IC R1,0(,R1)
CHI R1,=H'13'
BNE ...
Ignoring that this is lousy code (unless, perhaps, the value is looked at
again, in which case having it in a reg could be advantageous), I hope
that this was a slightly
I was able to reproduce your problem with the e characters.
If this command (which is what I wrote):
od -An -tx1 -j256 xlbin_2 | tr -s ' ' tcpx_2
was entered with an e after the quotes, like this:
od -An -tx1 -j256 xlbin_2 | tr -s ' ' e tcpx_2
or with a string beginning with e, like this:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:35:10 +, Martin Packer wrote:
I think the original question was about using REXX in an E15 exit (or
equivalently an E35).
This is something I've contemplated doing in the past but the required
machinery is beyond me (or at least my patience). :-)
I'm also not sure
I've got a few comments on this question/response;
1) WLM under zOS 1.9 isn't going to recognize any processor later than an z196,
so you might have some interesting decisions made by it.
2) If you're using ICSF, it might not recognize CryptoExpress 4 cards.
3) Depending on your ISV software
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chase, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mike Bell
the first thing to check would be entry point - a non-zero entry point
is one of the easiest things to loose
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
snip
We'd still like to know why loading the program from a PDSE apparently
changed how (and more importantly, where) the system passed the PARM=
string.
-jc-
I would consider this explanation to be unlikely. The
john.archie.mck...@gmail.com (John McKown) writes:
Wasn't there something about a PASCAL programmer knowing the value of
everything and the Wirth of nothing?
two people from the Los Gatos VLSI lab originally did mainframe pascal
for VLSI chip tools ... this goes on eventually to become the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
snip
We'd still like to know why loading the program from a PDSE apparently
changed how (and more importantly, where) the
We randomly run into a problem where DFDSS Flashcopy gets an ADR935W error.
Looking at the return/reason codes, it says it was unable to complete an
establish request because of the request being canceled by system Missing
Interrupt Handler (MIH) processing.
We found that the output device on
Again, my thanks to all for the help, which was my fault in not realizing
that I had used the -o switch instead of the -O switch and so was not
having my code optimized.
On the off chance that anybody was wondering why I was doing this, it was
just a test to try to determine the best way to see
In 4528858360446052.wa.ron5174gmail@listserv.ua.edu, on
02/23/2014
at 11:23 AM, Ron Thomas ron5...@gmail.com said:
Hello. I am new to assembler so not sure whether i am asking the
right query? We have a assembler copybook and the corresponding file
is a VSAM KSDS.
I'm not sure what you
In 1068899486.316495.1393186164299.javamail.r...@comcast.net, on
02/23/2014
at 08:09 PM, DASDBILL2 dasdbi...@comcast.net said:
Just for future reference, since the name of this list-server is IBM
Mainframe Discussion List, what particular IBM systems, other than
System/360 and its descendants,
In
cahtjz9lpe6q2ades818nb0a1pd1v3o2a27_7ktkptr3ctdo...@mail.gmail.com,
on 02/24/2014
at 06:15 PM, Wayne Bickerdike wayn...@gmail.com said:
ASM to PL/I should be quite simple.
PL3 becomes FIXED DEC(3,0) etc.
WTF? PL3 is 24 bits; that's 5 digits and a sign. Why would it not be
DEC(5)?
--
We'd still like to know why loading the program from a PDSE
apparently changed how (and more importantly, where) the system
passed the PARM= string.
PDSEs are 4K page oriented, so when loaded, they are generally
going to start at a 4K boundary. When loading from a PDS,
fetch processing
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:00:43 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
on 02/23/2014 at 08:09 PM, DASDBILL2 said:
Just for future reference, since the name of this list-server is IBM
Mainframe Discussion List, what particular IBM�systems, other than
System/360 and its descendants, are also called
Bobby,
From our default IEAIOSnn member.
MIH DASD=01:00
HYPERPAV=YES
ZHPF=YES
Individual addresses can be used to override these values.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Herring, Bobby
Sent:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Mulder
We'd still like to know why loading the program from a PDSE apparently
changed how (and more importantly, where) the system passed the PARM=
string.
PDSEs are 4K page oriented, so when loaded,
I've seen that happen issuing a lot of ROUTE commands from a batch job when the
response of the command being routed was suppressed. Try adding T=0 to your
ROUTE commands.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
paulgboul...@aim.com (Paul Gilmartin) writes:
Surely, when comparing technologies hardware and software from other
vendors should not be considered off-charter.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014c.html#62 Optimization, CPU time, and related
issues
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014c.html#64
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2E2B0/31.6
quote
| *VSM* *USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO|YES)*
| YES causes GETMAIN and STORAGE OBTAIN behavior to be unchanged from
| its historic behavior. NO causes GETMAIN and STORAGE OBTAIN behavior
| for user-region private area subpools that
On 24 February 2014 10:44, Anne Lynn Wheeler l...@garlic.com wrote:
two people from the Los Gatos VLSI lab originally did mainframe pascal
for VLSI chip tools ... this goes on eventually to become the vs/pascal
product. Amoung other things it was used to implement the original
mainframe
t...@harminc.net (Tony Harminc) writes:
You've mentioned this a number of times, but I don't think you've
explained what you did to the Pascal code to get a 500x improvement.
Was the original code exceptionally bad, was your new code
exceptionally brilliant, did you take advantage of some
Martin,
Thanks for clarifying what OP really wanted.
Binaymin Dissen,
Here are the answers to your questions.
Q.it is sad that DFSORT does not support the alternate DDNAME parameter).
Answer : DFSORT indeed supports alternate DDnames with option SORTDD.
SORTDD= Specifies a four-character
SMP/E releases before V3R5 cannot process the MCS input that is
developed specifically for V3R5, nor can they process data in the
SMPCSI data set. In SMP/E V3R4, if your SOURCEID value meets either
of the following conditions, a message is shown to indicate that your
operand contains a value that
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:13:04 -0500, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
Why oh why are you asking questions about this old stuff? All currently
supported releases of SMP/E and z/OS support long sourceids. The last
release of z/OS that only tolerated long sourceids was V1.9 (contained
SMP/E V3.4), which
Was the original code exceptionally bad, was your new code exceptionally
brilliant,
When I worked on Strobe we saw this all of the time. One shop saw job runtime
drop from 24 hours to eight minutes. We could only wonder what they had done
in the first place.
Bob Shannon
Ex-Programart
Woo Hoo, Elardus! After all these years of griping about having to use an X on
many lines of DSLIST results, you've pointed out my lack of investigation. //X
... // works beautifully! Tks *very* much.
signature = 6 lines follows
Neil Duffee, Joe Sysprog, uOttawa, Ottawa,
Hi Bill,
I see the problem,
It looks like the
exit
oget 'tcpx_2' tcpx2
lines were concatinated to the end of the od command.
Since I wasn't sure what was being done, I just copied and pasted.
I will try again tommorow, and see what happpens.
Thanks for your help
Gadi
Excellent forensics. And thanks for the detailed explanation.
Bill Fairchild
- Original Message -
From: John Chase jch...@ussco.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 9:02:54 AM
Subject: Re: S0C2 in DB2 application program (was Stored Procedure) IFF run
Your guess is correct. Copybook is the way most Assembler programmers for
DOS/360 or VSE systems pronounce DSECT.
Bill Fairchild
- Original Message -
From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 7:53:29 AM
I bet if you timed it the strchr() TRT in a loop is faster.
On 25/02/2014, at 12:19 AM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, my thanks to all for the help, which was my fault in not realizing
that I had used the -o switch instead of the -O switch and so was not
having my
It would be DEC(5) I'm sure he'll work through this without taking
everything literally.
An ISPF edit macro could easily do the job
CHANGE ALL PL3 FIXED DEC(5,0) ;
etc..
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In
As I posted recently in another thread, I certainly appreciate the intellectual
challenge etc., etc. of finding the absolute fastest way of performing some
machine function.
However, I hope you realize that in real life the exact speed of TRT versus
SRST is going to be dwarfed by the cost of
Hi Bill,
I found the problem, and now the od command is producing the correct output.
Thanks for your help
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bill Godfrey
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 3:32 PM
To:
They are not trying to run on the hardware directly, they are asking about
running under z/VM as a guest.
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
Brian,
We don't have z/VM, we will use only for the migration in case to be
required. You must tell me what will be the best migration path with or w/o
z/VM. biut an the end we can remove z/VM or keepit, depends of the solution
and if it's necessary.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Brian
Hi,
Is it possible to lis all sysmods (ptfs) applied on a certain date, or during a
date range?
Thanks
Gadi
לשימת לבך, בהתאם לנהלי חברת מלם מערכות בעמ ו/או כל חברת בת ו/או חברה קשורה שלה
(להלן : החברה) וזכויות החתימה בהן, כל הצעה, התחייבות או מצג מטעם החברה,
58 matches
Mail list logo
