Except 1MB (and a fortiori 2GB) page frames were designed to do something
else: Give better TLB effectiveness - fewer entries to cover the same
amount of memory.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
I am out of the office until 28/04/2014.
mails will be read sporadically. In urgent cases use mobile phone or
contact my manager Bernd Mueller.
Note: This is an automated response to your message IBM-MAIN Digest - 17
Apr 2014 to 18 Apr 2014 (#2014-108) sent on 19/04/2014 6:00:00.
This is the
I thought there would be the flags, Ed. So thanks for confirming.
It just occurred to me that a useful query an installation could run would
go something like this:
Pick up all the CICS regions in SMF 30 - using the Usage section to pick
up their CICS release.
Compare the MEMLIMIT in the same
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Based on your TSO command, put an ampersand before the REXX program like
this: T,'CMD(%DRLEINIT)'
That's a percent; an ampersand () would be wrong.
Arrh. Thanks for spotting my error. I have not enough coffee...
I must humbly say thank you very much for
On 18 Apr 2014 19:42:01 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On 4/14/2014 8:26 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
How many ISVs reading this list would decline to support their products under
z/OS 2.1 because they were purchased at 1.13? But I'd expect some latency
for development and testing
No, IBM is not an ISV, as hopefully you know, Mr. Morris.
Lately, I seem to have been casting myself in the role of a defender
of IBM. That is not my wont, and IBM can anyway defend itself. I
have, however, grown tired, very tired of cheap shots like this one.
Easy to dismiss out of hand, they
I've got a drop in replacement for all of those environments bar SDSF with Lua
and I'll add multi-threaded programming, HTTP, websockets, XML, JSON, SOAP,
regular expressions and a whole lot more. In a z/OS UNIX environment luaposix
http://luaposix.github.io/luaposix/docs/index.html covers a
To be honest, if I wanted to do what Vig wanted it would be in C or Assembler
on OMVS
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
On Apr 19, 2014, at 11:39 AM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got a drop in replacement for all of those environments bar SDSF with
Lua and
My button collection www.mxg.com/TheButtonMan, button numbers 359-368,
I have the images of the front of those OS/360 marketing cards with
the ten questions,
If your customer asks: :
Q1 - What does dynamic space allocation mean
Can You answer
thru
Q10 - Why OS/360?
(which
I got a 404 error.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Barry Merrill
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 12:09
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Q1-Q10 - 1965 IBM Cards with Question on Front and Answer on back
My button collection www.mxg.com/TheButtonMan,
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I got a 404 error.
http://www.mxg.com/thebuttonman/index.htm
HTH! (as long you don't press on MY button. ;-D )
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On 19 Apr 2014 08:00:49 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
No, IBM is not an ISV, as hopefully you know, Mr. Morris.
Lately, I seem to have been casting myself in the role of a defender
of IBM. That is not my wont, and IBM can anyway defend itself. I
have, however, grown tired, very
IMO, programming language and file organizations are
complete different things and should be discussed seperately.
Furthermore, you have direct access on all platforms, including
Windows and Unix; this is not a matter of programming language at all.
And: you have keyed access, because it is easy
Greetings ,
In our shop , we see that vary commands are processed slow most of the time
. We have not applied any maintenance recently and there are no messages or
dumps which actually tell us why this happen . Can someone share some
possibilities in general when this can happen ?
We are running
How did you determine they are slow.
How long do you think they should take?
How long would it normally take?
How long does it now take?
How many devices are in the vary command at one time?
What analysis have you done to determine slow
What timings do you get when you vary one device compared
When you say the response is slow then did you check the enqueues or cpu or
any exception messages in rmf or something should be in logrec. Have you
started experiencing it recently ?
On 20 Apr 2014 09:36, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
How did you determine they are slow.
How
That's the problem with us now ...we don't see significant difference from
the logs .
When one device is varied offline , it gets processed instantly
When vary is issued against a set of devices (may be 10 ) , we see a delay
of 15 to 20 seconds . But our storage person keeps complaining that
Do you have any automation tools like OPS/MVS or Tivoli or other?
Perhaps you need a timer in the VARY command step to delay the time the next
step runs.
The vary may not be slow, but the IO Subsystem to the array may not be coming
back quickly enough. Have you run performance reports on the
I agree with lizette. I/O reports should tell you.
On 20 Apr 2014 10:18, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
Do you have any automation tools like OPS/MVS or Tivoli or other?
Perhaps you need a timer in the VARY command step to delay the time the
next step runs.
The vary may not
19 matches
Mail list logo
