Re: SORT JCL

2014-09-16 Thread Thomas Berg
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Shane Ginnane Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 12:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SORT JCL Thanks a lot Kolsu.. It worked. Thanks! Now that this has finally

Re: JoAT (was: SORT JCL)

2014-09-16 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Ed Gould wrote: As to ddlist and dslist, I am not familiar with those. Perhaps they are in house??? I think it is ISRDDN before it was made available and documented. (dslist - not to be confused with listds) But of course, I may be wrong... If so, please correct me... Groete / Greetings

Re: SORT JCL

2014-09-16 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Thomas Berg wrote: Well, we just have to look at DFSORT as a programming language - with what follows. OTOH, what it does it does very fast and efficient so it's worth the effort to learn it IMHO. Indeed. Look at my JCL for SMF record 89 I posted sometime ago on IBM-MAIN. In the past, I

Dumb IARCP64 question

2014-09-16 Thread Peter Relson
Thanks for doing IBM's documentation for them. g I'm sure we all thank the posters for the clarifications and suggestions, but better would be for this information to be sent in by you as a suggestion. It is rarely helpful just to say that a section is bad (or to complain only in this venue),

Re: SORT JCL

2014-09-16 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 06:36:45 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: I still find it amazing that DFSORT can handle VB datasets and put results into a FB dataset. That alone enabled me to discard undocumented, but slow programs which do that same trick. I customarily use IDCAMS REPRO for that

Re: Deleting Cluster Using IEFBR14 or IDCAMS

2014-09-16 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2014-09-16, at 02:32, R.S. wrote: Question: what is the proper purpose of IEFBR14? IMHO this is the only use of IEFBR14 by the users. OK, maybe some tricks with CONDs, but it's marginal. Somtimes because it's the only way to conditionally suppress execution of the first step in a job

Re: JoAT (was: SORT JCL)

2014-09-16 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2014-09-15, at 22:40, Ed Gould wrote: On Sep 15, 2014, at 10:57 PM, Ed Gould wrote: -SNIP__ editor, but AFAIK there isn't one out there(anyone know of one?) nedit.

Logon / Command Procs

2014-09-16 Thread Randy Harris
Hello, I have 2 separate DB2 systems on the same lpar. For accessing them, I have the datasets added to my ispf command proc. Cuurently, I have to logoff and logon with a different logon / command proc to access the other DB2 system. I would like to access both DB2 systems from the same logon

Re: Deleting Cluster Using IEFBR14 or IDCAMS

2014-09-16 Thread Ed Gould
On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:05 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: Ed Gould wrote: The nightly production meeting was held and I had to get up and explain WTF had happened and how I fixed it. There was a grizzled old female first sergeant that didn't like my explanation as she knew everything.

Re: Logon / Command Procs

2014-09-16 Thread Mike Schwab
In my userid.CLIST(SIGNON), I have these lines at the bottom: WRITENR TO ALLOCATE DB2 LIBRARIES - P=PROD, T=TEST(G,H), N=NONE: READ ANS IF ANS = N THEN EXIT WRITE STARTING DB2ALLOC CLIST IF ANS = T THEN DB2ALOCT IF ANS = P THEN DB2ALLOC To change, type LOGONGO at the ready

Re: Deleting Cluster Using IEFBR14 or IDCAMS

2014-09-16 Thread Thomas Berg
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:07 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Deleting Cluster Using IEFBR14 or IDCAMS On 2014-09-16, at 02:32, R.S. wrote:

Re: Deleting Cluster Using IEFBR14 or IDCAMS

2014-09-16 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:22:06 +0200, Thomas Berg wrote: Sometimes less clearly as NOT CATALOGUED 2. I HATE that one.(That it allocates it as non-catalogued. Can it happen anymore, BTW ? Was a long time ago...) Non-SMS? I believe there's an option. PARMLIB? -- gil

Re: Deleting Cluster Using IEFBR14 or IDCAMS

2014-09-16 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Ed Gould wrote: In the Army you weren't supposed to question (her) authority. Ops. No firing squad for you? ;-) No... I had to go up two floors to the commanding officer and explain it to him, which I did, but I used nicer language :) Ouch! I think most IBM-MAIN members would also use

Re: MVS

2014-09-16 Thread Steve Conway
Freaking pedants. You all know the base is still MVS. I know it's a sport to some, but it would sure be nice if every damn thing didn't have to be argued and picked apart. Steven F. Conway, CISSP AO-DTS- CTHO-HSD INFRASTRUCTURE (INFR) z/OS Systems Support Phone: 703-295-1926 Mobile:

Re: MVS

2014-09-16 Thread Gross, Randall [PRI-1PP]
looking for the like button. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Steve Conway Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 10:42 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: MVS Freaking pedants. You all know the base is

Re: Logon / Command Procs

2014-09-16 Thread Lizette Koehler
Are you using the DB2 ISPF option that is provided? Or are you doing something else. The DB2I panel has a function to select the DB2 SSID you want to access. Typically DB2 is accessed with the SSID. Unless you have a modified ISPF environment for DB2. As I recall, you will need to STEPLIB

Re: Logon / Command Procs

2014-09-16 Thread Lizette Koehler
I would check out Thomas Conley's Dynamic ISPF process on the CBTTAPE.ORG File #495. If you question is beyond DB2, that you want to access ISPF functions more dynamically, this is where you can start. If it is just DB2, then IDUG.ORG is a good place to check the archives. Lizette

Re: MVS

2014-09-16 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shane Ginnane On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 07:25:10 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: Can't we forget MVS (that's *so* 20th Century), and talk instead about z/OS, which is the topic of the Redbook (see URL)? Nope. Up to,

Re: MVS

2014-09-16 Thread Phil Smith
John Chase wrote: z/OS is a package. MVS is just an operating system that's included in z/OS. What he said. I'm as pedantic as the next guy (well, not if the next guy is some of the people on this list) but there are times when MVS is the correct term. Especially (but not only) when

Re: Question concerning running z/OS LPARs under z/VM

2014-09-16 Thread Anne Lynn Wheeler
allan.stal...@kbmg.com (Staller, Allan) writes: z/VM solved the nested paging issue the late 80's. Usually by making the guest image so large that paging never became an issue. There was also the preferred guest feature. The problem was worse than you can ever imagine. I pontificated a lot

Re: MVS

2014-09-16 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:25:50 -0700, Phil Smith wrote: John Chase wrote: z/OS is a package. MVS is just an operating system that's included in z/OS. What he said. I'm as pedantic as the next guy (well, not if the next guy is some of the people on this list) but there are times when MVS is the

Re: MVS

2014-09-16 Thread Ed Jaffe
On 9/16/2014 8:58 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: My point, perhaps made too subtly, was Ed G's apparent stubborn refusal to admit the existence of z/OS. But even so, Unix System Services (Ed called it the 'others') existed as far back as MVS (not z/OS) 5.2.2 or earlier.. IIRC, OpenEdition MVS (aka

IBM cuts pay by 10% for workers picked for training

2014-09-16 Thread Dave Jones
FYI: http://www.computerworld.com/article/2683239/ibm-cuts-pay-by-10-for-workers-picked-for-training.html DJ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the

Re: IBM cuts pay by 10% for workers picked for training

2014-09-16 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:16:19 -0500, Dave Jones d...@vsoft-software.com wrote: FYI: http://www.computerworld.com/article/2683239/ibm-cuts-pay-by-10-for-workers-picked-for-training.html DJ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: MSG IKJ56961E LISTBC TERMINATED

2014-09-16 Thread John Norgauer
For some reason, there was no dynalloc return / reason code displayed. This is the text of the message: THE MESSAGE LOG COULD NOT BE ALLOCATED.+ The + sign indicates that there is additional info available, but I can not get that info. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion

Re: MVS

2014-09-16 Thread John Gilmore
z/OS is now clearly an umbrella term, only definable ostensively and comprised of a proper subset of the technologies that are executable on z/Architecture machines. These technologies have, in general, little else in common. I am reminded of the elements of one of Borges's sets: {suckling

Re: MSG IKJ56961E LISTBC TERMINATED

2014-09-16 Thread Skip Robinson
LISTBC may be getting run by your logon proc or some such, which makes getting additional info difficult. Once you're logged on, try typing LISTBC yourself. ? should work then. . . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager

Anyone using a newer version of IDCMSGEN?

2014-09-16 Thread Sam Golob
Hi Folks, The program IDCMSGEN from CBT File 360 (Wisconsin State Wilson Street computing center) creates DEFINE cards to redefine an existing VSAM dataset. The program does so, by generating a LISTC report internally, and then scraping that report for information, in order to format the

z/OS FTP client behavior

2014-09-16 Thread Richard Pinion
First, I'm not in the TCP-L group. Second this is a general question regarding the behavior of the z/OS FTP client. Third, I do not read every IBM manual cover to cover and commit to memory. In this case, I should have done number three. We are running z/OS 1.13. Executing the FTP client

Re: z/OS FTP client behavior

2014-09-16 Thread Jousma, David
That is not FTP only behavior. Try concatenating an empty dataset in any utility, and any data after the empty dataset is ignored. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Engineering david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris,

Re: z/OS FTP client behavior

2014-09-16 Thread Richard Pinion
I did. I tried IEBGENER (ICEGENER for us) and CoZ's SFTP. Both processed the entire concatenation. --- david.jou...@53.com wrote: From: Jousma, David david.jou...@53.com To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS FTP client behavior Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014

Re: z/OS FTP client behavior

2014-09-16 Thread Charles Mills
Are you thinking perhaps of a DUMMY dataset rather than an empty dataset? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 11:43 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OS

Re: z/OS FTP client behavior

2014-09-16 Thread Jousma, David
Sorry, you are correct. I confused myself. The actions I described is when DD DUMMY is in the middle of a concatenation _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Engineering david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand

Re: z/OS FTP client behavior

2014-09-16 Thread Jousma, David
Yes. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Engineering david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI  49546 MD RSCB2H p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.2717 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: Question concerning running z/OS LPARs under z/VM

2014-09-16 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 8348187731951949.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on 09/15/2014 at 01:54 PM, Paul Gilmartin 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said: Perhaps even worse, nested paging. AFAIK, PR/SM is strictly V=F, so no paging. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT

Re: Anyone using a newer version of IDCMSGEN?

2014-09-16 Thread John McKown
File 528 on the CBT has my version of something similar. On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Sam Golob sbgo...@cbttape.org wrote: Hi Folks, The program IDCMSGEN from CBT File 360 (Wisconsin State Wilson Street computing center) creates DEFINE cards to redefine an existing VSAM dataset. The

Re: JoAT (was: SORT JCL)

2014-09-16 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 8003041207513935.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on 09/15/2014 at 06:15 PM, Paul Gilmartin 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said: (ISPF for CMS allows a choice of PDF or XEDIT although 2 is not one of the only three nice numbers. ISPF for z/OS allows no such

Re: EZANS Requirement

2014-09-16 Thread Gibney, Dave
Still private? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 9:03 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: EZANS Requirement This was posted on the TCPIP List See the RFE

Re: Question concerning running z/OS LPARs under z/VM

2014-09-16 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:12:21 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: at 01:54 PM, Paul Gilmartin said: Perhaps even worse, nested paging. AFAIK, PR/SM is strictly V=F, so no paging. And how is that relevant to the OP's question about VM guests? (Well, z/OS LPARs under z/VM is sort of a

Re: JoAT (was: SORT JCL)

2014-09-16 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:22:12 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: (ISPF for CMS allows a choice of PDF or XEDIT although 2 is not one of the only three nice numbers. ISPF for z/OS allows no such flexibility Yes it does. I'm not sure why you would want to, unless someone has ported XEDIT to

Re: Dumb IARCP64 question

2014-09-16 Thread Charles Mills
Peter - Thank you. We have disagreed on this point before but let me say again that if a customer of mine posted here that my product's documentation was lacking in some particular area I would thank them, not tell them that they had told me in the wrong way. Yes, I quoted only a portion of the

Re: z/OS FTP client behavior

2014-09-16 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:40:58 -0700, Richard Pinion wrote: To prevent transferring data from an empty file, FTP checks whether the first file in a concatenation series is empty and allocates an empty data set. No data is transferred. Morons. Obsessive-compulsive morons. The test is otiose.

Re: z/OS FTP client behavior

2014-09-16 Thread Charles Mills
Yup. Over-engineering. Over-validation. Like examining a filename to see if it is syntactically valid rather than just passing it to the OS's open function and seeing if it works for the OS. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Help wanted: z/OS pre-sales (full-time salaried)

2014-09-16 Thread Charles Mills
We are looking for (in addition to the SMP/e contractor) a full-time salaried z/OS pre-sales person. Here are part of the qualifications/job description. Further details on request: We are looking for a person to install and support our mainframe software offerings. Requirements are • In

Emptiness (was: z/OS FTP client behavior)

2014-09-16 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:29:57 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: Yup. Over-engineering. Over-validation. Like examining a filename to see if it is syntactically valid rather than just passing it to the OS's open function and seeing if it works for the OS. With the annoying consequence that if someone

Re: Emptiness (was: z/OS FTP client behavior)

2014-09-16 Thread Charles Mills
Perhaps I'll submit an RCF. You are a kind soul. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 2:36 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Emptiness (was: z/OS FTP client

Emptiness (was: z/OS FTP client behavior)

2014-09-16 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:40:58 -0700, Richard Pinion wrote: First, I'm not in the TCP-L group. Second this is a general question regarding the behavior of the z/OS FTP client. Third, I do not read every IBM manual cover to cover and commit to memory. In this case, I should have done number

Re: Deleting Cluster Using IEFBR14 or IDCAMS

2014-09-16 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In ea1e439b-1f07-415c-928f-367daa81e...@comcast.net, on 09/16/2014 at 05:17 AM, Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net said: I had to get up and explain WTF had happened and how I fixed it. Is that like explaining how to ride a bicycle. That is, did it take 20 times longer to explain than to do?

Re: Deleting Cluster Using IEFBR14 or IDCAMS

2014-09-16 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 7f788686-4633-42d3-813b-09a0abccb...@comcast.net, on 09/16/2014 at 08:46 AM, Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net said: On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:05 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: Ed Gould wrote: The nightly production meeting was held and I had to get up and explain WTF had happened and how

Re: MVS

2014-09-16 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 4924742431039275.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on 09/16/2014 at 10:58 AM, Paul Gilmartin 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said: My point, perhaps made too subtly, was Ed G's apparent stubborn refusal to admit the existence of z/OS. But even so, Unix System Services

CEE3596S loading LE user handler

2014-09-16 Thread Frank Swarbrick
Getting this error: CEE3596S An MVS load of module FBHDLRB failed. The system abend code was 0306; the reason code was 000C. FBHDLRB is a COBOL user handler that we've specified. Options Report for Enclave main 09/16/14 5:27:02 PM Language Environment V01

Re: CEE3596S loading LE user handler

2014-09-16 Thread Frank Swarbrick
Forgot a couple of items (always get anxious and hit send too soon!). z/OS 1.13 The actual program that is executing is the FTP client. It runs fine, it's only when the system attempts to load the user handler at termination where the issue occurs. You may be wondering why we'd run a user

Re: MVS

2014-09-16 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:50:55 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: BTW, how do people feel about components that have the same FMID in consecutive releases? On balance I believe that IBM is doing the right thing there, but there are minuses. Which are they doing? If it's the same thing it

Re: CEE3596S loading LE user handler

2014-09-16 Thread George Young
http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r11/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.zos.r11.ieah700/h7scc.htm snippet --- 306 Explanation: The error occurred during processing of a LINK(X), XCTL(X), ATTACH(X), or LOAD macro. An incorrect load to global request was attempted, or the authorized routine

Re: CEE3596S loading LE user handler

2014-09-16 Thread Frank Swarbrick
Hmm, not sure why my search didn't turn up that 306 code. I find it now. I wonder why we've not seen this issue before . Or perhaps this person is the first to notice it. Thanks for the help! Frank From: George Young gmyo...@windstream.net To:

Re: Emptiness (was: z/OS FTP client behavior)

2014-09-16 Thread Charles Mills
Does this count? “There's just something obvious about emptiness, even when you try to convince yourself otherwise.” ― Sarah Dessen, Lock and Key Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent:

Re: JoAT (was: SORT JCL)

2014-09-16 Thread Ed Gould
Seymour: There was a bit of discussion offline about SPF and its origins, Can you shed some of your knowledge from whence it came? Ed On Sep 16, 2014, at 2:28 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: In 60d89285-3b33-4d1a-b667-ea5f868c5...@comcast.net, on 09/16/2014 at 12:14 AM, Ed Gould

Re: Deleting Cluster Using IEFBR14 or IDCAMS

2014-09-16 Thread Ed Gould
On Sep 16, 2014, at 2:34 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: In ea1e439b-1f07-415c-928f-367daa81e...@comcast.net, on 09/16/2014 at 05:17 AM, Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net said: I had to get up and explain WTF had happened and how I fixed it. Is that like explaining how to ride a

Re: Deleting Cluster Using IEFBR14 or IDCAMS

2014-09-16 Thread Ed Gould
On Sep 16, 2014, at 2:44 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: In 7f788686-4633-42d3-813b-09a0abccb...@comcast.net, on 09/16/2014 at 08:46 AM, Ed Gould edgould1...@comcast.net said: On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:05 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: Ed Gould wrote: The nightly production meeting

Re: MVS

2014-09-16 Thread Ed Gould
Paul: It wasn't stubbornness so much I find getting on in my age I try not to ramble with long names that everybody understands (except for maybe you) and trying to keep things sharp and focused. I don't have enough time to go on about every option or (OS) there is. When you floated the

Re: z/OS FTP client behavior

2014-09-16 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:29:57 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: Yup. Over-engineering. Over-validation. Like examining a filename to see if it is syntactically valid rather than just passing it to the OS's open function and seeing if it works for the OS. There's a partial and mostly unsatisfactory