Greetings,
We have a KSDS file that gradually fills up with records. After deleting a
large number of records we still received nonzero response codes when
trying to add new records indicating that there is no available space in
the file. We have no alternative but to disable access to the file
BTW This would have to be executed (e.g. through REXX) from the 'READY'
prompt, before the user's TSO PROC was started.
CM Poncelet wrote:
If the routine's APF'd loadlib is added to an APF'd STEPLIB, the
STEPLIB will override the LNKLST CBT requirement.
Meanwhile, APF-authorizing/unauthorizi
If the routine's APF'd loadlib is added to an APF'd STEPLIB, the STEPLIB
will override the LNKLST CBT requirement.
Meanwhile, APF-authorizing/unauthorizing a loadlib 'on the fly' can be
done in batch with:
"//*
APF-AUTHORIZE:
On 14/03/2016 3:37 PM, Robin Atwood wrote:
GSKSSL: Unable to create log mutex: EDC5167I Access to the UNIX System Services
version of the C RTL is denied.
followed by an 0C4 for good measure. Is this telling me SSL can only be used
under USS
In that case the SSL API is using pthread mutexes
The STEPLIB TMP will work -- The caveat this routine MUST be placed on the
LNKLST in an
APF Authorized library.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Dan D
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 8:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.U
CBT file 452 contains the STEPLIB TSO command.
Dan D. (CBT File owner)
"Steve Horein" wrote in message
news:...
> DSC is a product offered by IBM. It was once known as ISPF Productivity
> Tool, or SPIFFY.
> However, one of the CBTTape files offers a STEPLIB utility (I don't recall
> which file
DSC is a product offered by IBM. It was once known as ISPF Productivity
Tool, or SPIFFY.
However, one of the CBTTape files offers a STEPLIB utility (I don't recall
which file number.)
At the shop where I got my start, I used the CBTTape offering to supplement
dynamic ISPF applications.
On Mon, Mar
I did a simple search in Google and found something called Data Set Commander,
which appears to include a STEPLIB command. DSC seems to be at 8.1. Looks like
a program product.
.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
In your initial question you showed path
/Service/usr/lpp/cobol/../../demo/oosample/Check.j
".." refers to the parent directory, so doesn't this resolve to
/Service/usr/demo/oosample/Check.j
//
Andrew Rowley
On 15/03/2016 2:41, venkat kulkarni wrote:
Here also its same /usr/lpp/cobol/demo/oosa
I love Linux, but my real love is mainframe. I had a senior moment, and I
haven't been on mainframe as much as I like to be.
It was SYSPROC that was commonly reallocated by CLIST and Rexx scripts in order
to do testing in the right order test/dev/prod or whatever. Not STEPLIB.
I think there i
Here also its same /usr/lpp/cobol/demo/oosample/Check.java. This file
should be created during applying process of this FMID.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Doug Henry wrote:
> On my system I can see this file name is
> /usr/lpp/cobol/demo/oosample/Check.java. Unless you truncated your displ
And, some are just being eliminated.
On 3/11/2016 12:34 PM, Ed Gould wrote:
> By | Paul Kunert 10th March 2016 16:05
> IBM to erase 14,000 people from the payroll – Wall St analyst
> Jobs to be bundled on a plane and flown to lower labour cost countries
>
>
>
> http://www.channelregister.co.uk
You are correct. 'PREPARE' only creates an ABR record. No verification or
data movement occurs.
Glenn Wilcock
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the m
Yup ...
Be aware that changing to POSIX(ON) will introduce other subtle changes in
behavior. For example, fopen()'s decision on what is a legacy dataset and what
is a UNIX file changes. I was surprised to see that DD:SYSPRINT was now the
name of a new UNIX file and happily created it under /u/!
No, its mounted under R/W .
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Staller, Allan wrote:
> Check file permissions. Is the zFS file read only?
>
>
> I can clearly see all file systems are mounted correctly .
>
> HFS 190 ACTIVE RDWR 03/06/2016 L=138
> NA
On my system I can see this file name is
/usr/lpp/cobol/demo/oosample/Check.java. Unless you truncated your display
yours end with j instead of java.
Doug
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:52:52 +0530, venkat kulkarni
wrote:
>Hello All,
> I can clearly see all file systems are mounted corr
Check file permissions. Is the zFS file read only?
I can clearly see all file systems are mounted correctly .
HFS 190 ACTIVE RDWR 03/06/2016 L=138
NAME=OMVS.MVS1.ZOS13.SIGYROOT23.40.14Q=138
PATH=/Service/usr/lpp/cobol
Wh
Verify the size of your target as compared to the source. It should be as large
or larger than the original.
Why iebcopy to pdse datasets abended with iew2756s-d609 Space is not available
on direct access storage, b37-04 but the final return code equal 0, when we
copy 100 members only 90 copie
Ben,
You're on the right track, but I've always kept the device numbers on the array
and z/OS the same so don't know if the mix of Annn on the array and Ennn on the
host would work.
My site example:
mklcu -dev IBM.2107-blahblah -qty 1 -id A0 -ss A000
mklcu -dev IBM.2107-blahblah -qty 1 -id A1 -
Hello,
Healthcheck VLF_MAXVIRT is informing us, that the VLF has trimmed objects
younger than ALERTAGE specified in COFVLFxx.
It also display the age of the youngest trimmed object.
Where does HC get this info from?
This is useful information for adjusting the size of the VLF cache, but why is
Well, you might think its fine, but the system does not:
TEC1:$ bpxmtext 0594003D
BPXFVLKP 12/05/14
JRDirNotFound: A directory in the pathname was not found
All values are normal :-)
--
Lionel B. Dyck (Contractor)
Mainframe Systems Programmer
Enterprise Infrastructure Support (Station 200) (005OP6.3.10)
VA OI&T Service Delivery & Engineering
Office: 512-326-6173
Cell: 925-348-02
Thanks. I had just spotted Charles's post back in 2012 with the same problem
and used a pragma. Now the init function fails with 202 (KEYRING OPEN ERROR)
but that looks like an admin problem. :)
Thanks
Robin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSER
You need to specify a POSIX(ON) LE runtime option. You can do this in
the JCL or explicity specify it in your main with #pragma runopts(posix,on)
On 14/03/2016 3:37 PM, Robin Atwood wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Robin Atwood [mailto:abend...@gmail.com]
Sent: 11 March 2016 21:02
To: 'R
-Original Message-
From: Robin Atwood [mailto:abend...@gmail.com]
Sent: 11 March 2016 21:02
To: 'Robin Atwood'
Subject: RE: Linking C module with SSL
So now the problem is to actually run the code. I start my STC and it attempts
to initialise the SSL environment and promptly gets:
GSKSS
Ah, I've probably been remiss here, but I raised a PMR with IBM on this issue
in October - as a result, they PE'd UA76032 and UA76033. Apparently the changes
to IEBCOPY were to aid in the migration to COBOL5 and the requirement that
COBOL5 executables must be program objects.
The APAR is OA4908
Charles
Yes, the current code I am working in is written in C but we also have other
servers written in assembler and in time they will need to be SSL enabled. We
have already successfully set up AT-TLS but the powers that be think that
embedding SSL in the code is more flexible.
Meanwhile, doe
27 matches
Mail list logo
