Hi
The documentation says for ECBLIST
All ecb's must be in the home address
Space. Does that mean addressable from the
Hone address space
As I have 1 ecb's in the home address space
And 1 in CSA
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
-
Just wanted to confirm for you all that Skips' note below is totally accurate.
Addition of the below 2 lines is ALL that is needed to convert your existing
jobs from the unsecure ftp delivery to the secure HTTPS delivery (and in my
case also solved a firewall issue I'd been having with my Notwor
Followed Jim's instructions to add a WSAT entry for QUIESCE wait state. IPLed
it in, then did another QUIESCE command. Got SAD and AutoIPL. SAD title:
AUTOIPL WAIT STATE CODE 0CCC
Thanks to everyone.
.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
S
Thank you John and Curtis for the explanation .
Infact , I should have said UCW instead of UCB to make it more clear . But
now i understand that they could be physically different devices .
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Pew, Curtis G
wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2016, at 3:08 PM, baby eklavya wro
> Testing was semi-successful. On one hand, QUIESCE stopped the
> system. Missing heartbeat was detected by SFM and system was
> partitioned out. However, I was also trying to test SAD and AutoIPL.
> Nothing happened in that arena, so--as I do when all else fails--I
> RTFM. Found this:
>
> "For
> You can write a simple assembler program to load a WAIT PSW that is
> disabled for interrupts or you can modify the RESTART NEW PSW in the
> PSW with the wait bit on and disabled for interrupts.
>
> If you use the RESTART NEW PSW, then a PSW RESTART should result in
> your system going into a wa
On Jun 7, 2016, at 3:08 PM, baby eklavya wrote:
>
> To my understanding , when sharing MCS consoles in a sysplex , one thing
> which matters is the console name which has to be unique for each LPAR even
> though the UCB can be the same . Then again , console uses EXCP to write
> the screen of da
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:08 PM, baby eklavya wrote:
> Hi Listers ,
>
> To my understanding , when sharing MCS consoles in a sysplex , one thing
> which matters is the console name which has to be unique for each LPAR even
> though the UCB can be the same .
Then again , console uses EXCP to wri
For completeness I'm posting the 'Wait state action table (WSAT)', which
determines the DIAGxx action(s) to take for various wait states. I'm surprised
at how short this table is.
Entries are of the form fwww, where
f
represents flags
represents the reason code
www
represents the wait
Hi Listers ,
To my understanding , when sharing MCS consoles in a sysplex , one thing
which matters is the console name which has to be unique for each LPAR even
though the UCB can be the same . Then again , console uses EXCP to write
the screen of data each time . Since the UCB is shared , how
You can write a simple assembler program to load a WAIT PSW that is
disabled for interrupts or you can modify the RESTART NEW PSW in the
PSW with the wait bit on and disabled for interrupts.
If you use the RESTART NEW PSW, then a PSW RESTART should result in
your system going into a wait state.
B
When I saw your original post, the first thing I thought of was a
program that sets the PSW so it can't be interrupted, then loops for a
time (while checking the clock) before exiting. ATTACH a few of these
tasks and maybe you could take over all CPU's and better simulate the
bad-dog. Just a
Testing was semi-successful. On one hand, QUIESCE stopped the system. Missing
heartbeat was detected by SFM and system was partitioned out. However, I was
also trying to test SAD and AutoIPL. Nothing happened in that arena, so--as I
do when all else fails--I RTFM. Found this:
"For restartable w
Scott-
We had issues with IND$FILE through our TN3270 client when we were using a
Session manager. Just a thought.
Cheryl
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Scott Ford
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 6:41 PM
To:
On 6/7/2016 8:41 AM, michelbutz wrote:
Can someone tell me what the advantage of this
Is then using IEAVPSE2 is it performance
I think they both set up a SSRB
SUSPEND/RESUME w/TOKEN *only* works for SRBs. Pause/Release works for
both tasks and SRBs. Performance wise, SUSPEND/RESUME w/Token h
Hi All,
We have recently created a RACF digital certificate and it is used to encrypt a
file on the Postilion server. Later the file is transferred to the Mainframes
and when we try to decrypt the file, we are getting below error:
Caught GeneralSecurityException: null
Can someone tell me what the advantage of this
Is then using IEAVPSE2 is it performance
I think they both set up a SSRB
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 7, 2016, at 11:27 AM, Greg Dyck wrote:
>
> On 6/6/2016 6:54 AM, Steve Smith wrote:
> > I'm wondering what an SRB SUSPEND exit is really good for
On 6/6/2016 6:54 AM, Steve Smith wrote:
> I'm wondering what an SRB SUSPEND exit is really good for. The
Services Guide and Reference state that it is required, and that it is
supposed to save the SUSPEND token, and decide whether to allow the
SUSPEND. I can't see why the SRB mainline couldn'
Among the tasks that I am now responsible for maintaining, there is a suite of
programs written in Assembler that manufacture jobs, by building the text and
writing them directly to the internal reader. There is never any PDS member or
source involve.
---
Charles,
We generate JCL from SAS programs on Windows and write them direct to JES with
FTP.
filename jesftp0ftp '.submit' USER="&user" host="&host"
PASS="&pw"
rcmd='site file=jes' passive;
The sample is from within a S
I will proceed with QUIESCE once our automation SME is ready to test. Key goal
is to capture the partitioning message on another member of the sysplex and
blast out some alerts. In a recent failure at oh-dark-thirty on a Saturday
morning, Ops did not notice the wait state failure (SQA exhausted)
Tony,
I wasn't trying to stress test it.
I'm looking for an improvement in recovering from finger checks.
REC ON doesn't help once the member is saved :-( and backups aren't up to the
minute.
I like this.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LI
Yes, that's the standard way of doing it in Zeke - you define the schedule time
and/or the conditions that must be satisfied and also the member name and
library that is the source of the job. However, Zeke also allows for
dynamically created schedule queue records (SQRs), whereby Zeke "capture
Caveat: daily digestion implies response delays...
As was discussed extensively on IBM-Main before (Jan, Feb?), for all other
methods besides 'automation' submission, you're outta luck. 'specially in a
sysplex environment where conversion and xeq'tion could occur in different
locations.
For
Don't know.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: 07 June, 2016 16:36
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Determine the PDS a job was submitted from?
On 2016-06-07, at 08:18, Vernooij, CP (
On 2016-06-07, at 08:18, Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote:
> With IOF you can select a job that has run, edit the input JCL and submit it
> again. This job is exactly the job from your production JCL library, but
> doesn't come from there.
>
Does it preserve RECFM and LRECL of SYSINs?
-- gil
With IOF you can select a job that has run, edit the input JCL and submit it
again. This job is exactly the job from your production JCL library, but
doesn't come from there.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pau
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 08:26:41 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
>On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 16:08:30 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>
>>a programmer might
>>have typed JCL from scratch in an editor then SUBMIT on the command
>>line.
>
>I sometimes do that from within SDSF using line command SJ.
>And I frequently res
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 09:21:40 -0400, Charles Mills wrote:
>> Or from a Windows file, if you're so afflicted.
>
>Really? Without first copying it to a mainframe file or dataset?
>
Sure.:
ftp zos
user
password
quote site filetype=JES
put JCL somename
quit
(Haven't actually tr
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
> Ah! You're right. But the job goes off into never-never land. I have only
> used GET which submits a local JCL (on the FTP server mainframe) file or
> dataset and retrieves the SYSOUT back to the submitting FTP client.
>
never-never land? W
One interesting anomaly with PDSE generations is if you delete a member using
tso delete then the generations are not deleted. If you use LMMDEL to delete a
member (you can't delete an individual generation) then the member and all
generations are deleted.
BUT the anomaly is that if you then c
Ah! You're right. But the job goes off into never-never land. I have only used
GET which submits a local JCL (on the FTP server mainframe) file or dataset and
retrieves the SYSOUT back to the submitting FTP client.
BTW, I *think* you mean quote SITE filetype=jes
Charles
-Original Message--
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 20:08:32 -0500, TonyB-IBM-MAIN wrote:
>Does the generation counter get incremented when a member is output of a batch
>job?
AFAIK, when a member is written, the normal (default) behavior is to create it
as a new generation if that is the way the PDSE was created. An old gener
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
> > Or from a Windows file, if you're so afflicted.
>
> Really? Without first copying it to a mainframe file or dataset?
>
Sure. Use ftp
ftp zos
quote filetype=jes
put myjob.jcl
>
> Charles
>
>
--
The unfacts, did we have them, are too
> Or from a Windows file, if you're so afflicted.
Really? Without first copying it to a mainframe file or dataset?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 8:12 PM
To: IBM-MAI
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 16:08:30 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>a programmer might
>have typed JCL from scratch in an editor then SUBMIT on the command
>line.
I sometimes do that from within SDSF using line command SJ.
And I frequently resubmit a job the same way.
--
Tom Marchant
---
Mark and Skip:
I can assure you that QUIESCE will stop the XCF heartbeat. I have used
it often in training to demonstrate the loss of heartbeat and triggering
the sysplex to respond to the loss of a member. With an active SFM
policy, it will trigger your desired action.
The advantage to usin
Yes... I recall some discussion awhile back with the consensus being a “likely
no”. I wanted to make sure I was not missing something. Thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to list
It has some good points. I,also, prefer to download the pdf's as needed. There
are times that I have to move around inside the same document and having the
pdf downloaded just makes the job easier for me.
On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 7:38 AM, Jon Butler wrote:
Jack, Oy it is because I li
Jack, Oy it is because I like it for the very reason you state: it's easier to
search. It appears to actually consider the terms you enter in the search
field. Did someone at IBM look at Google Scholar search?
However, like you, if I don't really know what I need it may be a bit dicey.
That
40 matches
Mail list logo