Re: How to write messages to JESYSMSG only? (was: Randomly disappearing IGD101I messages)

I can help a bit with the first question but not the other two. We have an ancient and venerable JES2 EXIT 6 that writes messages to JESYSMSG only. It uses the IFGRPL macro (AMODGEN). I did not write this part of the code, but I could send you a sample if you'd like. It's based on PUT with the

Re: Does anyone use HFS files extensively with HLASM?

On 2016-10-26, at 09:22, Pew, Curtis G wrote: > On Oct 26, 2016, at 9:17 AM, Charles Mills wrote: >> >> Sounds like this is slightly bleeding edge. I think I will try to sync my >> "code management" processes (C versus HLASM) a little more closely together >> but continue to

OA51508: IN Z/OS2.2 WHEN STACKING FILES ON TAPE ABEND637-54 OCCURS WHEN ATTEMPTING SWITCH TO ANOTHER VOLUME.

Hello All, With regards to the following, I'm not sure I follow what this is about. Does this mean that the volume stacking that happens due to back-to-back VOL=REF=* usage will just fail in v2r2? I hope the "we issue a VERIFY" is how the function is internally handled, and not something that's

Re: Does anyone use HFS files extensively with HLASM?

On Oct 26, 2016, at 9:17 AM, Charles Mills wrote: > > Sounds like this is slightly bleeding edge. I think I will try to sync my > "code management" processes (C versus HLASM) a little more closely together > but continue to keep HLASM source and object in a PDSE. I’ll just

Re: Does anyone use HFS files extensively with HLASM?

Thanks, @John and @Gil. Sounds like this is slightly bleeding edge. I think I will try to sync my "code management" processes (C versus HLASM) a little more closely together but continue to keep HLASM source and object in a PDSE. Too bad, frankly. I wish there were more embrace of HFS by

Re: SMP/E and RFPREFIX

On 10/25/2016 7:08 PM, Phil Smith wrote: So if the SMPMCS contains: ++FUNCTION(VVSH710) FILES(2) RFDSNPFX(VSH) REWORK(2016166) Then if RFPREFIX(BANANA) were added to the RECEIVE command in the provided JCL, it would look for BANANA.VSH.VVSH710.F1 and BANANA.VSH.VVSH710.F2 instead of

How large are your system trace & master trace on z13?

I feel that our system trace is a bit small, especially since we moved to z13. We currently have set them to 15M (per processor). What do others use? -- Peter Hunkeler -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: Does anyone use HFS files extensively with HLASM?

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Charles Mills wrote: > Yeah, I know, there's an assembler listserve and this isn't it. I'm not on > it and I think most of its members are also here. This IS a mainframe > question ... > > Yeah, I could test the basic issues but I am wondering

Re: AW: Re: TIME= on JOB card vs. EXEC card

Peter, yes, you are correct. I was thinking too narrowly, of TIME= from the JOBCLASS being the same or longer than on the JOB, as stated in the question. I liked your bucket analogy. A longer JOBCLASS TIME= than JOB TIME= will not allow a step to run for longer than what is on the JOB card.