Re: Finding a member ... (with IEBCOPY)

2018-04-07 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 20:33:01 +, Nims,Alva John (Al) wrote: >You are correct that the input data sets cannot be concatenated, but I might >give an update to the solution in that you can specify multiple input DD's on >the copy statement. >From the examples for merging 4 data sets into one

Re: Finding a member in a DD concatenation

2018-04-07 Thread Nims,Alva John (Al)
You are correct that the input data sets cannot be concatenated, but I might give an update to the solution in that you can specify multiple input DD's on the copy statement. From the examples for merging 4 data sets into one single one, but with an addition of the select statement:

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBMVSM,ZOSMIGV2R3_NEXT_VSM_USERKEYCOMM

2018-04-07 Thread Brian Peterson
I hope folks don't misunderstand my point. User Key Common is a scurge and we can't be rid of it soon enough. However, IBM needs to understand that their current offering of a PER IF SLIP trap / GTF trace is not a user-friendly way to identify the culprit.

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBMVSM,ZOSMIGV2R3_NEXT_VSM_USERKEYCOMM

2018-04-07 Thread Tom Conley
On 4/7/2018 1:35 PM, Brian Peterson wrote: On my system, JES2AUX and DEVMAN are both flagged. "I" suspect they are innocent, but perhaps I should just open PMRs and have those components prove it. If I wasn't laughin', I'd be cryin'.

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBMVSM,ZOSMIGV2R3_NEXT_VSM_USERKEYCOMM

2018-04-07 Thread Brian Peterson
On my system, JES2AUX and DEVMAN are both flagged. "I" suspect they are innocent, but perhaps I should just open PMRs and have those components prove it. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBMVSM,ZOSMIGV2R3_NEXT_VSM_USERKEYCOMM

2018-04-07 Thread Peter Relson
>RAX_SMF30_SAPFlags This information is captured in the SMF30 records as of the APAR that introduced this health check (OA53355), in the byte at offset 178 (x'B2') in the Storage and Paging section of the SMF 30 record mapped by DSECT SMF30SAP in macro IFASMFR3. And information about that

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBMVSM,ZOSMIGV2R3_NEXT_VSM_USERKEYCOMM

2018-04-07 Thread Tom Conley
On 4/6/2018 10:51 PM, Brian Peterson wrote: Tom, good points. However, I've been working with the SMF data, and have to say it's not very helpful. Similar in fact to the system-level health check. The SMF record only says that User Key common storage was allocated by some program in this

Re: Finding a member in a DD concatenation

2018-04-07 Thread Kirk Wolf
If I understand the question, I think that the BPAM access method already does what you are asking for. If you concatenate partitioned datasets and then OPEN, BLDL, FIND, POINT, READ... then you can read the member found first in the concatenation. See "DFSMS Using Data Sets" / "Processing a PDS

One last question on TAPELESS delivery

2018-04-07 Thread Edward Gould
Hi, Before I go into a viper pit for telling the boss and his boss and his boss and be asked many questions that I am nowhere near qualified to answer. Is there an IBM book/manual or SHARE presentation that I can show to the management what will be needed, hardware (software) wise to be able

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBMVSM,ZOSMIGV2R3_NEXT_VSM_USERKEYCOMM

2018-04-07 Thread Martin Packer
Without wishing to open a can of worms, I can say there are several program-related items I’d love to see in SMF 30 (or similar). For example, today we have the Top TCB Program Name and Percent in SMF 30. I’d love to have “top 3” or “top 5”. But I digress... :-) Sent from my iPad > On 7 Apr