Was it a single IFTHEN?
Also, I suppose that IFTHEN, being relatively new, might’ve had a different
implementation. But I don’t know and I doubt this kind of internal is
something Sri Hari would feel free to talk about.
Sent from my iPad
> On 4 Apr 2019, at 00:08, van der Grijn, Bart (B)
wrote
The documentation is correct. Anything older than EC12 (or BC12) will drop to a
wait state. I've tried it on a z196 and almost instantly get a wait.
---
Jim Stefanik
Dallas Vintage Computing Center
From: Christian Svensson <022ad63487ef-dmarc-requ...@listse
Hi,
I know that z114 is not officially supported on z/OS 2.3 - but I was
wondering if anyone has had any success IPLing it just for experimental
purposes on this platform?
I see that the wait state documentation for z/OS 2.3 wait state 07B says
that "Miscellaneous-instruction-extension facility"
z/OS is already using the 2GiB to 4GiB area.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 7:51 PM Paul Edwards wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 19:38:02 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
> wrote:
>
> >>I was thinking that z/Arch and z/OS could
> >>be updated to support AMODE 32.
>
> >Cui bono?
>
> Combined with making GETMAIN LOC=
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 19:38:02 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>>I was thinking that z/Arch and z/OS could
>>be updated to support AMODE 32.
>Cui bono?
Combined with making GETMAIN LOC=ANY,
when executed AM32, getting memory in the
2 GiB to 4 GiB region, it would allow a long
term plan of having pure
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 18:17:46 -0500, Paul Edwards wrote:
>I was thinking that z/Arch and z/OS could
>be updated to support AMODE 32.
>
Cui bono?
Actually, Java uses 32-bit addressing. In a way. Simulated.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAI
I was thinking that z/Arch and z/OS could
be updated to support AMODE 32.
If a load module is marked AMODE ANY,
RMODE ANY it could signify that it is
32-bit clean. That combination is
currently not really used, and the linker
can be updated to accept this combination.
PSW bit 30 can be used to si
Thanks all for the comments and advice. My issue is resolved, but I don't yet
understand why.
A big thanks to Kolusu. I took him up on his offer and sent him the relevant
data offline. He produced a solution that looks as follows (apologies if the
formatting gets messed up):
My original contr
The SHAREMEMOBJ is cleaned up at address space termination (or if explicitly
detached with AFFINITY=LOCAL). GETSHARED requests are never automatically
cleaned up and must be explicitly detached with AFFINITY=SYSTEM. The memory is
finally freed when all local and system requests have detached (ex
Hi Folks,
I'm happy to announce that the 64-bit version of the LOOK program
from CBT File 264 is finally out, on the Updates page of
www.cbttape.org. It has been a long time in coming.
Now you can browse virtual storage and and navigate control blocks
in all three: 64-bit, 31-bit,
W dniu 2019-04-03 o 14:49, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw pisze:
Can anyone point me to documentation showing the internal differences between
basic format and extended format datasets?
It is undocumented (in publicly available documentation).
All we know is:
EF must be SMS-managed
EF must be allocate
Encryption is good (if properly used), buzzwords are buzzwords.
Agreed!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 10:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Pervasive encryption and batch temporary datasets
W dniu 201
W dniu 2019-04-02 o 14:59, Allan Staller pisze:
Let me try it this way.
Is df/SMS encryption a pre-requisite to the z/14 "PERVASIVE ENCRYPTION"?
DFSMS encryption is technical feature, which apply to selected kinds of
datasets.
Pervasive Encryption is a buzzword which means nothing special e
Hi Lennie.
A" standard practice" among developers whose products use EXCP (eg DFSORT)
is to switch to BSAM in the case of Extended Format.
That might tell you which way the wind is blowing.
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email
Tom,
Thanks. I found this summary only.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.idad400/coefsds.htm
I am trying to understand what is going on under the covers. I am also trying
to understand what programming changes might be needed if a customer is using
EX
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 07:49:31 -0500, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote:
>Can anyone point me to documentation showing the internal differences between
>basic format and extended format datasets?
Did you look in DFSMS: Using Data Sets?
--
Tom Marchant
-
Can anyone point me to documentation showing the internal differences between
basic format and extended format datasets?
Thanks,
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
17 matches
Mail list logo
