Phil Smith III wrote:
>I think you're missing one of my main points: "Substantial,
>real progress" isn't what data set encryption provides. It
>provides a LITTLE BIT of protection for a FEW minor attack
>vectors.
I disagree.
>Read about data-centric protection, note the analysts and
>standards bo
Will these do?
https://www-05.ibm.com/e-business/linkweb/publications/servlet/pbi.wss?PAG=C11&SSN=19HHB0002880621576&TRL=TXT&WRD=&PBL=GC30-3073&LST=ALL&RPP=10
https://www-05.ibm.com/e-business/linkweb/publications/servlet/pbi.wss?PAG=C11&SSN=19HHB0002880621576&TRL=TXT&WRD=&PBL=GC30-3438&LST=ALL&RPP
[Default] On 31 Jul 2019 14:44:53 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
jesse1.robin...@sce.com (Jesse 1 Robinson) wrote:
>One frequent selling point for cloud solutions is that WE the hired-hand
>storage experts can take better care of your precious data than you can. I
>sense Death of a Salesman...
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:55:53PM -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
> Roughly forever we've loaded modules into 24- or 31-bit CSA by first
> LOADing the module normally into private storage, obtaining the actual
> length from the LOAD, DELETEing the module, getting the necessary CSA
> storage, and finall
Roughly forever we've loaded modules into 24- or 31-bit CSA by first
LOADing the module normally into private storage, obtaining the actual
length from the LOAD, DELETEing the module, getting the necessary CSA
storage, and finally using LOAD with ADDR=. This works fine, but seems
unduly complicated
Which simply means that if UNIT and VOLUME are not supplied then it looks in
the catalog, where it detects a MIGRAT value if the data set is migrated.
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw | Security Lead | RSM Partners Ltd
Web: www.rsmpartners.com
‘Dance like no one is watching. Encrypt like eve
Timothy Sipples wrote:
>Even if you believe IBM caused some confusion -- I cannot find much
>evidence in the historical record of official IBM communications, but if
>that's what you believe -- that's certainly NOT a reason to add any more.
>I've asked you to help reduce terminology confusion,
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 16:25:52 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>The Initiator does not check that the data set exists; ...
>
... and yet it checks for whether it's migrated.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
[Default] On 7 Aug 2019 09:45:51 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
sme...@gmu.edu (Seymour J Metz) wrote:
>Some nits:
>
> 1. I doubt that much was written in machine language in 1955, although
> assemblers were
>primitive by today's standards.
>
> 2. Many Share projects maintained mods tapes in
Data sets on tape are created by OPEN. For that matter, allocation does no I/O
for card punches, paper tape punches or printers; if you have the first two
that is TMI.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussi
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 12:44, Greg Price wrote:
> On 2019-08-07 10:59 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
> > Thanks would IEWBIND work with load modules
>
> Yes, IEWBIND - the "full" Binder API - can process PDS load modules as
> well as program objects from a PDSE and from the UNIX file system.
>
It c
Thanks Jesse and Shmuel, Jesse, my original parmlib update was pretty simple
SEND /* SEND COMMAND DEFAULTS */ +
OPERSEND(ON) /* */ +
USERSEND(ON) /* */ +
SAVE(ON) /* */ +
CHKBROD(OFF) /* */ +
LOGNAME(ULOG.DATA.SYST) /* */
after the first hang I went truging into the fine manuals, and used
Thanks
> On Aug 7, 2019, at 12:44 PM, Greg Price wrote:
>
>> On 2019-08-07 10:59 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>> Thanks would IEWBIND work with load modules
>
>
> Yes, IEWBIND - the "full" Binder API - can process PDS load modules as well
> as program objects from a PDSE and from the UNIX
That's true for DASD, but, not for Tape, IIRC.
On 2019-08-07 12:53, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> They say that the memory is the second thing to go (I don't remember the
> first.) IEFBR14 with DDDISP=(,PASS) or DISP=(,CATLG) does allocate a new data
> set. there would be much wailing and gnashing of
They say that the memory is the second thing to go (I don't remember the
first.) IEFBR14 with DDDISP=(,PASS) or DISP=(,CATLG) does allocate a new data
set. there would be much wailing and gnashing of teeth if it stopped doing that.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
_
Some nits:
1. I doubt that much was written in machine language in 1955, although
assemblers were
primitive by today's standards.
2. Many Share projects maintained mods tapes in the 1970s, and it would be
appropriate
to mention some of the maintainers by name. As I recall, Romney Whit
On 2019-08-07 10:59 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
Thanks would IEWBIND work with load modules
Yes, IEWBIND - the "full" Binder API - can process PDS load modules as
well as program objects from a PDSE and from the UNIX file system.
Cheers,
Greg
On 2019-08-07 6:36 PM, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote:
However, I think standard TSO ALLOCATE does perform that check
Yes, I was probably basing my opinion on my observations of the
behaviour of the ALLOCATE command.
Cheers,
Greg
---
Doing it from a program
Thanks
> On Aug 7, 2019, at 12:21 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> Do you simply need a map, or do you need the ability for an application to
> get a map? For the former, there's always AMBLIST.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
> _
>From years ago, I *think* an IEFBR14 step with DISP=(,CATLG) [or
(,PASS)] does not physically allocate a dataset on a VOLSER but only
registers it in the usercat. Have you checked whether it is in the VTOC?
Chris Poncelet (retired sysprog)
On 06/08/2019 20:38, Charles Mills wrote:
> FWIW I t
The Initiator does not check that the data set exists; if it did, the
documented JCL for various utilities and service aids would not work. As you
note, "some of the text units used in dynamic allocation have no equivalent in
the DD statement."
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/
Do you simply need a map, or do you need the ability for an application to get
a map? For the former, there's always AMBLIST.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Joseph Reichman
Sen
If it hangs then I suggest that you report it and work with IBM to get a fix.
An error in your parmlib should give you an error message.
Did you take a console dump of the hanging SEND command?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
Fr
Best I can do is show you what we have had for decades. It's not a
'recommendation', just evidence of something that works. (I just noticed the
comment about 'transition'. 😉 ) Be sure that your SAF rules are set properly.
Remember that updates to user broadcast is done by the system, not by a
p
I'm trying to update the list of references in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Systems_Network_Architecture; each of these
has a URL that now longer goes to the manual:
Systems Network Architecture Technical Overview. Fifth Edition. IBM. January
1994. GC30-3073-04.
Systems Network Architectur
On my 2.3 sandbox system I am trying to convert to user datasets for brodcast,
I've RTFM(s) and updated the parmlibs accordingly, seems to be a 2 step
process to totally move from sys1.brodcast.
current parmlib values for SEND
SEND /* SEND COMMAND DEFAULTS */ +
O
Thanks would IEWBIND work with load modules meaning if I want link map from a
load module
Thanks
> On Aug 6, 2019, at 10:03 PM, Greg Price wrote:
>
>> On 2019-08-07 5:37 AM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>> The program is not a program object, anomalies were found in its
>> structure, or the progr
Correcting a couple of careless "n" and "m" typos in my previous post...
--
Another, similar approach that is sometimes used is to use "key shares" instead
of components. The difference is that with components, you must combine ALL of
the components to form the master key, but wi
The master keys, which are stored securely inside the Crypto Express HSM and
can never be extracted, are the top-level keys in the key hierarchy. Your
application-level keys are stored outside the HSM, encrypted by the master
keys. Thus, if the HSM fails, you still have the externally-stored a
Greg was asking if you are trying to get info about load modules or
program objects. The former isn't supported using IEWBFDAT.
In article you wrote:
> I tried two load modules using the load macro to load them into memory that
> I know execute
> And got the same error
> > On Aug 6, 2019, at
I tried two load modules using the load macro to load them into memory that I
know execute
And got the same error
> On Aug 6, 2019, at 10:03 PM, Greg Price wrote:
>
>> On 2019-08-07 5:37 AM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>> The program is not a program object, anomalies were found in its
>> struc
At $previousjob we had copies of the ICSF Master Encryption Keys stored in
secure locations. During disaster recovery testing authorized people would
re-enter those keys into the crypto-express hardware on that processor. One
time we also lost a crypto-express card on our production machine. The
Phil Smith III wrote:
>I feel that IBM inadvertently caused the confusion by calling
>the data set encryption "PE" at first: the fact that this
>thread refers to it as such actually supports that, no?
You've made this assertion a couple times now, and it's not actually true
as far as I can tell. I
Greg,
I think you'll find that whether SVC 99 checks that a data set exists on disk
or not depends on the text units used.
If I want the 'does data set exist' check made I usually include the text unit
to return data set organisation (DALRTORG). This ensures that the DSCB for the
data set is
34 matches
Mail list logo
