Dear Folks,
Please leave the distribution of my articles as is. If you want to
see more of them, please think responsibly and don't post them. Get
them from where they are. Thanks much.
Sincerely, Sam
--
For
I was thinking maybe a cbtnewslettter web page where updates to technological
articles are posted as .pdf then when they're updated Sam could point us to the
new link as a .pdf.
In a message dated 12/23/2019 7:36:23 PM Central Standard Time,
wayn...@gmail.com writes:
I like it where it is, it
On 23 Dec 2019 14:27:00 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:<5007816406371788.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu>)
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Paul
Gilmartin) wrote:
It's not obvious to me that a zipped NETDATA archive of an
IEBCOPY-unloaded
PDS fixed-80
To quote Rick Nelson.
"But it's all right now, I learned my lesson well.
You see, ya can't please everyone, so ya got to please yourself"
It's a Tour de force. Good work Sam.
I like it where it is, it makes me go there.and learn.
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 9:27 AM Paul Gilmartin <
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 21:41:03 +, Edward Finnell wrote:
>Well sort of. I tried to post it as a .txt attachment and it was rejected due
>to length. Maybe a happy medium is to subscribe to the CBT Newsletter.
>
Instructions? OK: http://www.cbttape.org/maillist.htm
Is there an archive?
Yahoo
On 12/23/19 12:53 AM, Jake Anderson wrote:
Hello
Hi,
Cross posted
Where is it cross posted from / to? (I'd like to look at the other
location.)
Out network vulnerability team has reported that there is a traffic between
0.0.0.0 and LPAR IP.
Is there any chance that the vulnerability
Well sort of. I tried to post it as a .txt attachment and it was rejected due
to length. Maybe a happy medium is to subscribe to the CBT Newsletter.
In a message dated 12/23/2019 9:31:25 AM Central Standard Time,
bdis...@dissensoftware.com writes:
It is not a binary choice. It can be both
Rex, I had a bit too much egg-nog while on the job too I guess. I saw that
*right* after I pressed Send at least we all had the right link!!!
_
Dave Jousma
AVP | Manager, Systems
Dave,
Somewhere in the middle? Lizette's first attempt was CISIZER, the second
CFCISER, reality CFSIZER.
Don't worry, Lizette, I do the same thing all the time. :-) You got it right
where it counted - in the URL.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
While I would certainly like to see the reports posted here, the cbttape.org
home page has a lot more than just one link.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Keith Smith
For me cbttape.org just had a link to
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cbt-tape/ and then I requested access to
the yahoo group and now I need a yahoo group ID... so I just quit trying.
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 1:27 PM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On
On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 15:23:14 -0500, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>Any way you could just put a copy in a post to this list?
>
Why? Is cbttape.org inaccessible to you?
>Sam Golob wrote on 12/22/19 2:36 PM:
>>
>> I've just completed a new article which you might find interesting
>> to read. It
I think you were right the first time Lizette! A bit early for the egg-nog...
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/cfsizer
_
Dave Jousma
AVP | Manager, Systems Engineering
Fifth Third Bank |
Sorry it should read CFCISER not CISIZER. Had a finger check
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Lizette Koehler
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 10:42 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: LOGSTREAM sizing factors
>
> Have
Have you tried the CISIZER on https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/cfsizer
It may have some information for you on this process.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Peter
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 9:25 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
Hello All,
We are going to deploy a zOS product which writes LOGSTREAM on CF
structure. From the performance point of view what are all aspects i need
to be aware for example dasd space for LOGSTREAM logs, storage sizing , CF
memory sizing and we are expecting atleast 50 million transaction on
Very interesting!
Great job Sam!
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 1:37 PM Sam Golob wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I've just completed a new article which you might find interesting
> to read. It is on the Updates page of www.cbttape.org on File 120, as
> member BM1912DE.
>
> The article talks about
Something I noticed on the BBC web site this morning...
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-50840818/i-was-a-teenage-code-breaker-at-bletchley-park
My main take-away from it was "92 years old and still as bright as a
button!" I hope I last that well...".
Merry Christmas, all
Sean
Hi Binyamin AMV"SH,
וכל המרבה הרי משובח
א פרייליכען חנוכה
Regards,
David
On 2019-12-23 03:23, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 02:47:15 -0500 Arthur wrote:
>
> :>On 22 Dec 2019 12:23:25 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
> :>(Message-ID:)
> :>t...@vse2pdf.com (Tony Thigpen) wrote:
>
>
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, 10:12 Joe Monk, wrote:
> "0.0.0.0 is non-routable and a typical use in traffic would be in DHCP, in
> which an adaptor doesn't have an address assigned yet and the device sends
> out a DHCP request from 0.0.0.0 asking to be assigned a proper address."
>
> PCs dont send DHCP
"0.0.0.0 is non-routable and a typical use in traffic would be in DHCP, in
which an adaptor doesn't have an address assigned yet and the device sends
out a DHCP request from 0.0.0.0 asking to be assigned a proper address."
PCs dont send DHCP to 0.0.0.0. They send DHCP to 255.255.255.255 ...
The address 0.0.0.0 is nothing in and of itself to worry about. What you
need to worry about are the port numbers to which it is trying to
communicate.
Joe
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 1:54 AM Jake Anderson
wrote:
> Hello
>
> Cross posted
>
> Out network vulnerability team has reported that there
I don't know any of the mainframe conventions and others here will, but my
first question would be for clarification of what they mean by 'traffic'.
Is it protocol UDP or TCP or some other, if it's TCP is it simply SYN
packets (at the start of a TCP connection) without response, or is there a
Hi Rupert
I understand but any clue why it has traffic with Mainframe IP when it is
not even listening on any application
On Mon, 23 Dec, 2019, 12:28 PM Rupert Reynolds, wrote:
> 0.0.0.0 is a special "no address" or "any address", depending on context.
>
> If a listening server socket binds to
0.0.0.0 is a special "no address" or "any address", depending on context.
If a listening server socket binds to 0.0.0.0 then it listens on any
interfaces present, which might be two adaptors with addresses
192.168.something and 10.something, for example.
0.0.0.0 is non-routable and a typical use
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 02:47:15 -0500 Arthur wrote:
:>On 22 Dec 2019 12:23:25 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
:>(Message-ID:)
:>t...@vse2pdf.com (Tony Thigpen) wrote:
:>>Any way you could just put a copy in a post to this list?
:>I've read the article. I think Sam made the right decision;
26 matches
Mail list logo
