It depends on how you allocate it.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Anonymous
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2020 7:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
Depending on your clients willingness to change, you could use REXX/CICS.
It has a VM like editor. You can roll your own SUBMIT command. It is *free*
with CICS.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020, 06:14 Bernd Oppolzer
wrote:
> After working now two days with it, what strikes me most is the absence
> of a SAVE
After working now two days with it, what strikes me most is the absence
of a SAVE command.
Every line you change (or delete !) is changed on the file even without
SAVE, same goes for deletions,
and there is no recovery (no other than saving the member before you
begin or restoring an older
[Default] On 4 Feb 2020 07:57:25 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Paul Gilmartin) wrote:
>On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:39:58 +, Ronald Kristel wrote:
>
>>Was this not resolved with PI52704?
>>
>Looking at:
Tony, I'm pretty sure I understand RPO and RTO correctly. I'm used to
teach it.
However please, take care - we talk about backup copy only, not about
the system.
We don't know whole system setup and components. We know that tape
waiting for PTAM (truck delivery to secondary DC) cause some
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, at 16:31, Robert Prins wrote:
> On 2020-02-04 14:39, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> > That's confusing. Earlier you implied it was the execs (ie the logic, I
> > assumed)
> > that was changing. Now you say it's the data. Have you got both logic and
> > data
> > in the same
If nothing else, these are fun as reminders of dead companies/technologies:
How to get rid of your mainframe (c. 1996)
https://blog.strom.com/wp/?p=7568
which in turn references
How to turn off your mainframe, c.1995
https://blog.strom.com/wp/?p=3468
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:39:58 +, Ronald Kristel wrote:
>Was this not resolved with PI52704?
>
Looking at: https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PI52704
>
I don't see that this addresses the possibility that different users at
a single site may use different code pages. Is the
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 13:59:08 +, Beesley, Paul wrote:
>That's what I thought. PMR raised.
>
Looking at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.6.2
3.6.2. Originator Fields
...
I wonder what happens if you use your "From:" field and a
JES-friendly "Sender:" field?
>On Tu , 4 Feb
Was this not resolved with PI52704?
Kind Regards,
Ronald Kristel
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Beesley, Paul
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2020 2:59:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSSMTP and @ symbols
That's what I thought.
On 2020-02-04 14:39, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, at 13:19, Robert Prins wrote:
On 2020-02-04 10:56, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, at 11:44, Robert Prins wrote:
It also updates the change-logs in each of the affected execs, and as
we keep a few generations of older
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, at 13:19, Robert Prins wrote:
> On 2020-02-04 10:56, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, at 11:44, Robert Prins wrote:
> >
> >> It also updates the change-logs in each of the affected execs, and as
> >> we keep a few generations of older versions around, it's
That's what I thought. PMR raised.
Best Regards
Paul
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: 04 February 2020 12:50
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSSMTP and @ symbols
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:03:52 +, Beesley, Paul wrote:
>
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:03:52 +, Beesley, Paul wrote:
>
>We are converting from SMTP to CSSMTP, and leaving aside the headaches
>resulting from trying to pick the correct code pages, we have an issue with
>some FROM email addresses.
>Some userids contain @ symbols and are sending with FROM
Hi All,
I have a TASK-A that attaches TASK-B, and then waits for TASK-B to complete.
TASK-B does the following,
1. Dynamically allocate a linear dataset.
2. Issue "DIV IDENTIFY" for the allocated DDNAME.
3. Issue "DIV ACCESS", and then "DIV MAP".
I believe at the end of TASK-B, I need not
Hi,
anyone have any info on how to deploy zPDT in a Docker container? I have tried
to seach the net and IBM's Internet Library, but no luck so far.
Willy
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
On 2020-02-04 10:56, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, at 11:44, Robert Prins wrote:
It also updates the change-logs in each of the affected execs, and as
we keep a few generations of older versions around, it's irritating
that compares show that the change-log has been updated, but
Hello
We are converting from SMTP to CSSMTP, and leaving aside the headaches
resulting from trying to pick the correct code pages, we have an issue with
some FROM email addresses.
Some userids contain @ symbols and are sending with FROM addresses like
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, at 11:44, Robert Prins wrote:
> It also updates the change-logs in each of the affected execs, and as
> we keep a few generations of older versions around, it's irritating
> that compares show that the change-log has been updated, but
> that there are no other changes.
So
On 2020-02-03 21:52, Bob Bridges wrote:
I've never used the COMPARE command. (Never used MACRO_MSG, either.) What
message were you expecting from COMPARE?
"Files are the same"
or of course the message that tells me they're not. It would allow me to cancel
the update that in fact isn't an
Agreed, the SAPR would have been ideal for creating a 'customised' project
plan. Spent many hours, both as a reviewer of the draft versions and using it
as a project planning doc . I believe its no longer created - well not in its
original form
Regards
Parwez Hamid
"...It is 1000% better than the IBM VSE offering (name escapes me)"
It's 'ICCF' - but I really had to hunt for *that* particular brain cell.
I remember getting myself into trouble with my manager when recovering from
forgetting my password.
I dumped the first track of the ICCF VSAM(?), and
22 matches
Mail list logo
