A silver lining to global warming?
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 9:56 AM Ed Jaffe
wrote:
> On 9/24/2021 8:57 AM, Grant Taylor wrote:
> > It seems as if the announcement on IBM's site may have been slightly
> > premature (O(weeks)) as it has purportedly been withdrawn and someone
> > else in the
On 9/24/2021 8:57 AM, Grant Taylor wrote:
It seems as if the announcement on IBM's site may have been slightly
premature (O(weeks)) as it has purportedly been withdrawn and someone
else in the community has said that it should be available in mid
October.
ISTR the "z/OS Hobby License" SHARE
Glad you mentioned "contemporary z/OS". Even if the thing runs slower
than an A01, modern software makes it far better for education than the
Hercules TK4 setup or even the elephant Ray mentioned.
P.S. If I run your email sig through Rexx it comes up with UNIXDIE which
is probably not what
As a developer, I love REXX and I love Pipes. Together, they are
programmer heaven. Whenever I write something new, whether in z/OS or
z/VM, I write a REXX EXEC. Under z/OS, I SPAWN the EXEC when I want to run
it in batch.
I have used BatchPipes only briefly, but I know Pipes fairly well.
Agreed - $120 is something affordable by most, and I'm really excited to see
this coming out
Jerry Whitteridge
jerry.whitteri...@albertsons.com
Manager Mainframe Systems & HP Non-Stop
Albertsons Companies
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Grant Taylor
On 9/24/21 9:41 AM, Tom Brennan wrote:
Like Ray, for years I've been advocating something free or nearly free
with every IBM manager I happen to see. No effect so far. If this
works it could be a big change for future education.
I feel like $120 / year is well within the reach of any
Ha ha - and worse for me. Getting a LinkedIn account will be more
upsetting to me than the $120 :) Hope I'm allowed to get one of the
dongles, even just to see how it all works. Like Ray, for years I've
been advocating something free or nearly free with every IBM manager I
happen to see. No
Martin wote:
>I'm not familiar with FANOUT but if it writes a record to, say, two
destinations, it's got to copy one of them.
Actually not. I know it sounds like magic, but there is still only one
copy. I'll give you my best rendition of what I think is happening. Don't
worry if you don't get
Sounds nice. I'll need to remove the years of encrustation and rust from my
LinkedIn account.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 8:59 AM Farley, Peter x23353 <
031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Someone on one of the mainframe groups.io lists posted this link to a
> LinkedIn article
On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 08:01:27 -0500, Hobart Spitz wrote:
>Mike wrote:
>>Could something be developed similar to a SORTOUT exit that implements
>this switch?
>BatchPipes fittings are like sort exits on steroids: They can be applied
>to almost any DD, ...
>
SORTWKnn?
A problem posed earlier was to
Phil, thanks again for the helpful feedback and the great food for thought.
Your point is well taken.
I'll try to break it down as best I can: MIPS or CPU usage, main memory or
working set, and input/output operations. (I'd be happy if someone else
has better information.)
MIPS is dependent
Someone on one of the mainframe groups.io lists posted this link to a LinkedIn
article on this offering by Ray Mullins:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/raymullins_ibmz-activity-684653939335168-Ah68
Interesting reading.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Mike wrote:
>Could something be developed similar to a SORTOUT exit that implements
this switch?
BatchPipes fittings are like sort exits on steroids: They can be applied
to almost any DD, can use most Pipes filters, do not require compiled code,
and they are not restricted to a single program. I
"a fully configured parallel sysplex" - in the sense you meant it - is
something I see less often than I'd like. :-(
As a Performance guy, often the conversations I have with customers - based
on their data - have a big dollop of Resilience in them.
There are those that have embraced "a fully
14 matches
Mail list logo
