Check the IBM support portal. I am sure that IBM supports (or will support)
OpenSSH 7.4.
It is most likely in the maintenance stream somewhere in the maintenance stream.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Jodlowski
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 10:
YES. It is a hard restriction.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 10:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: DASD-only logging
After 20+ years of heavy duty parallel sysplex, we'd finally like to dip our
I suggest we all stop feeding the Bear!
::DISCLAIMER::
--
Prepare a business case and submit it to IBM.
I don’t think this list wants to spend a lot of time on something extremely
unlikely to happen.
Cheers,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Edwards
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 8:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LIST
2019-04-02 o 14:59, Allan Staller pisze:
> Let me try it this way.
>
> Is df/SMS encryption a pre-requisite to the z/14 "PERVASIVE ENCRYPTION"?
DFSMS encryption is technical feature, which apply to selected kinds of
datasets.
Pervasive Encryption is a buzzword which means not
ERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Pervasive encryption and batch temporary datasets
Allan Staller wrote:
>My understanding is that this was a "hardware" feature and did not
>depend on DFSMS (except as possible an on/off switch).
>In you post you refer to PERVASIVE ENCRYPTION (z/14?) vs
On Behalf Of
Timothy Sipples
Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2019 9:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Pervasive encryption and batch temporary datasets
Allan Staller wrote:
>(z13?) or z14 processor. Pervasive encryption handled by hardware
Matthew Donald wrote:
>No, only in the sen
of items within one's own shop to run some compares with.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
On 3/28/19 11:34 AM, Allan Staller wrote:
> It was originally R+ and then acquired by CA (CA-9?).
> IIRC, CA stopped marketing it fairly soon thereafter.
>
> At this point, I would guess it has b
It was originally R+ and then acquired by CA (CA-9?).
IIRC, CA stopped marketing it fairly soon thereafter.
At this point, I would guess it has been unavailable for more than 20 years.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
John McKown
Sent: Thursday,
I would expect the REFVTOC to be a very quick operation.
My concern would be getting control of the volume to perform the REFVTOC due to
the high activity catalog.
This sounds like something to attempt @ 0-dark-thirty, notify everyone of risks
and keep fingers crossed.
HTH,
-Original Messa
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1II13354
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jason Cai
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 10:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Moving a Catalog to a Different Volume
Hi all
According z/OS DFSMS Man
(z13?) or z14 processor. Pervasive encryption handled by hardware.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Matthew Donald
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 9:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Pervasive encryption and batch temporary datasets
I'm look
CSSMTP was designed to mitigate several concerns with the SMTP client.
As far as I can recall, there were some configuration options, that if not
addressed, allowed the SMTP client to be a mail relay (among several others).
CSSMTP was designed to eliminate those exposures.
I am not aware of any
Useless. Try search support portal for z/OS EOS.
That one is also less useful than others I have seen.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gibney, Dave
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 5:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Is it broken? or just
SFG
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Sasso, Len
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 1:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: IBM SFG - Your Opinion
Importance: High
I welcome your comments, suggestions, etc. about the IBM SFG Product.
Thank You!
This would relate to how robust the MQ setup is. We have had issues with
unexpected volumes of transactions.
You might try (e.g. 10K*400) multiple times.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ron
Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 12:39 PM
To: IBM-M
Check your JESPARMS for the MSGCLASS and SYSOUT class(es).
The OUTDEF or the related OUTCLASS(x) should contain an OUTDISP=(x,x) parameter.
You want WRITE or HOLD in the OUTDISP= instead of PURGE
Check the fine manuals for details.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
JES2 and JES3 can coexist. I am sure there are some arcane rules (as indicated
below).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Marchant
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 5:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS V2R5 Will be the Last Release
Ref:
https://www-01.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zOSV2R3Library
I observed one thing. The introductory "new style" screens are portrait
oriented and take up a lot of vertical real estate.
The new screens generate a lot of unnecessary scrolling.
I have a laptop and a desktop,
Forgot to add, this is a "soft" requirement implemented in z/OS 2.3.
i.e. z/OS will run in < 8GB, but if the LPAR is too small, strange things my
happen.
-Original Message-
From: Allan Staller
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 7:54 AM
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List&#
IEHIBALL!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Tony Thigpen
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 6:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Identifying and eliminating uncataloged datasets
I have inherited a system where nobody bothered to clean-up after the
The storage for the HSA is separate from the "orderable" storage. This has been
true for several hardware generations.
AFAIK, this memory size if fixed and cannot be changed.
This has nothing to do with the OP's question.
The OP wanted to know if there was any impact beyond replying to the warni
Sigh, the same old refrain. The "new tools" are neither as available reliable
or functional as those they replace.
I get the same problem you do, howver, an APAR search through:
https://www.ibm.com/support/home/
works fine,
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I recently ran into an issue where LE and COBOL needed to be updated
concurrently.
Due to a timing problem in rollout, this caused a major kerfluffle.
I would be very careful mixing and matching between LE and Cobol.
Otherwise, the buildmcs route should work.
HTH,
-Original Message-
Fro
___
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Allan Staller
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 10:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4
Not SREL. Various compenents were installed in their own SMP environments
(SMPE/Target/Dlib).
-Original Mes
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:01:13 +, Allan Staller wrote:
>For historical reasons, I have several SMP/E zones associated w/zOS and other
>ServerPac available items.
>I am going to consolidate all of the separate zones associated into a single
>zone
9132&sdata=sfZksnSHBPlVKs7fB%2FNH2AsCLdagXgVM5eldmTeD6vk%3D&reserved=0
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Allan Staller
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 9:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4
For historical rea
CAN migrate 2.2 -> 2.4 (= skip 1 version). That is what we are planning.
Kees
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Allan Staller
> Sent: 20 February, 2019 18:38
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
Behalf Of
Timothy Sipples
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 1:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4
Allan Staller wrote:
>If so, I need to get my 2.3 order in before I can no longer do so.
Why not order it now? I can't think of any downside as long as you're alre
about the z/OS version after 2.3 was named
> "the z/OS version after 2.3".
>
> Kees.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> > [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Allan Staller
> > Sent: 18 February, 2019 19:
Has anybody seen the z/OS V2R4 preview announcement go by?
If so, can you provide a link or Announcement number?
TIA,
::DISCLAIMER::
---
59
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
esmie moo
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 8:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMS QUESTION
Gentle Readers,
I encountered a problem with a space abend for a IAM VSAM EXTENDED FORMAT.dsn.
In the DATACLAS we
I get the same "not defined" message.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 12:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: HSM question - ML2 copy2 tapes that have no copy1
Try HSEND D
SYSSYM=ALLOW in JESPARMS?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 12:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PARMDD and Symbols in a Started PROC
OK, I am making some progress. I got past the JCL error b
how to get rid of them. I'll try the TAPEREPL process in a test
environment to see what happens.
Thanks.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 8:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [Extern
Most likely a continuation of a prior volume. Without going into a lot of
detail, if a dataset spans from 1 volume to another the 1st volume in the
sequence "owns it".
Duplex volumes are never referenced by DFHSM directly.
HSEND LIST TTOC will list all primary voulmes. I expect the duplex volum
13, 2019 9:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question - ML2 tapes no longer avaialble
Two recommendations below
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Allan Staller
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 7:03 AM
&g
For each affected volser:
HSEND LIST TTOC(volser) ODS(x)
HDEL 'datasetname' for each indicated dataset.
HSEND RECYCLE ALL EXECUTE PERCENTVALID(0)
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Tony Thigpen
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 9:00 AM
To:
JCL, FREE=CLOSE on the relevant DD statement. Unfortunately require a
recycle.
Several system level programs do this routinely.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jake Anderson
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2019 10:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.
I have heard of a company in the Far East the periodically (every 6 mths.,
IIRC) flips from site A to site B (and back).
Aus(?) to Phillipines ?) and back.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Savor, Thomas (Alpharetta)
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 7:08
I disagree. The answer is "it depends".
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 2:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Internal Coupling Channel on z13
It is possible to convert ENQ with SYSTEMS to RES
Why would you want to do this?
I presume you have the health-check recommended 4 backups (or more).
If the current backup is 'N', the next backup would be taken to N+1.
N will not be overwritten for 3 additional cycles. More than long enough to
make a backup copy.
To answer your question about fi
Reject would occur after the restore.
However, another semi-forgotten item has be paged into my virtual storage.
The "2 PTFs" do not need to be restored. They can be re-implemented with APPLY
REDO.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mike Schwab
Se
They were indented when I sent it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 11:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Style (was: Newbie SMP/E questions)
On 2019-01-29, at 09:52:18, Allan Staller wrote
Comments interspersed.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bob
Bridges
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 10:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Newbie SMP/E questions
I'm the Top-Secret admin for a client whose system programmer retired a coup
How do you add a SCHENV to a job? Does the user/submittor do this or is
it done automatically?
1) JES can assign a default SCHENV on the JOBDEF/JOBCLASS(n) init parms
2) Modern schedulers (CA7, CTL-M) allow this to be added to the job as part of
their processing.
3) SCHENV= on Job Card.
There a
GRS RING can/will run over CTC's. Not sure I would want to do that in a 3
member ring. It was bad enough in a 2 member ring.
I am currently using an ICF on a z/12 BC w/no issue. Howerr, I am not sure an
ICF is the same thing you are describing.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Ancient
MFT (and subsequent incarantions)
DOS/360 and subsequent incarnations
BOS
TOS
PCP
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bernd Oppolzer
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 6:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: how many OSes run on IBMz
what
kVM?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
John McKown
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 6:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: how many OSes run on IBMz
This is mainly a curiosity question. I know of: z/OS, z/VSE, z/TPF, and
z/Linux. Are there any o
z/OS 2.3
>
> W dniu 2019-01-18 o 19:21, Allan Staller pisze:
>> AFAIK, no.
>> However, ICSF is a pre-req for several other tasks (e.g. dfhsm) I
>> believe it is in your best interest to install ICSF on all connected
>> LPARs
> Is ICSF realy required by DFSMShsm?
&g
Yes. For certain fuinctions. Found out the hard way during 1 DR exercise.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 3:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ICSF and z/OS 2.3
W dniu 2019-01-18 o 19:21, Allan Staller
AFAIK, no.
However, ICSF is a pre-req for several other tasks (e.g. dfhsm)
I believe it is in your best interest to install ICSF on all connected LPARs
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mary Kay Tubello
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 12:17 PM
To: IBM-
You can always ask here. There is a vast level of broad knowledge from JOAT
type sysprogs.
In this particular case, you probably will have better luck on the RACF LIST.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bob
Bridges
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 12:
Does anyone have any pointers to reports should CF structure utilization?
CBTTAPE or other?
::DISCLAIMER::
--
CICS Web Services.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Windt, W.K.F. van der (Fred)
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 1:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: zos program to supply web based client
Hi,
The z/OS Web Enablement Toolkit does not work
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 2:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Generic query on Region allocation failure
I don't expect below-the-line CSA to be much affected by a hardware change
This looks more like the linklst dataset has taken an extent for some reason.
Try compressing the dataset containing CEEBINIT, followed by F LLA,REFRESH
IF that does not work an IPL will be necessary.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Wayne Bicker
NAVIQUEST?
DCOLLECT and RYO code.
Probably something on the CBTTAPE to uses as a starting point.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gadi Ben-Avi
Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 7:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: HSM management
Hi,
I am looking
I would check sys1.samplib. As many other have stated there are most likely
several examples on the CBTTAPE and elsewhere.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2019 5:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: USS10MSG s
You are referring to a "architectural level set".
I don’t have the details, but some OS'es will not support the hardware.
Some hardware will not support the OS;es.
E.G. z/OS 2.3 is not supported on z9 (I doubt it would work).
z/VM is your friend. You can mimic older hardware.
HTH,
-Original
Which Macro?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Smith
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2018 9:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM Mapping macro for ISPF statistics in PDS Directory entries?
I found this macro in the ISPF maclib. It's n
z/OS 2.2 and above allow use of system symbols in batch. See the SYSSYM=ALLOW
parameter of JOBDEF and JOBCLASS in the JES manuals.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
scott Ford
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2018 12:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
IIRC, there is some RACF work needed to support BLP.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 3:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Dancing around RMM
We want to discard some very old tapes after maki
TestPlex and two for the Production Plex.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:37 AM Allan Staller wrote:
>
> I am in the process or reconfiguring from a Single CF to multiple CFs (per
> partition) to eliminate the single point of failure.
> The subject of CFCC Thin Interrupts has been evalua
Extended addressability and RLS are (AFAIK) both supported for the HSMCDS.
There are caveats.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Feller, Paul
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 12:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Multi-volume HSM MCDS [
RLS is not needed (although it is supported for HSM CDS).
All that is needed is extended addressability (also support).
However, this requires converting the HSM CDSs to SMS Management.
I have done this with a "do nothing" MCLAS/DCLAS/SCLAS set of constructs.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From
I am in the process or reconfiguring from a Single CF to multiple CFs (per
partition) to eliminate the single point of failure.
The subject of CFCC Thin Interrupts has been evaluated and will most likely be
implemented.
As part of this process the discussion of DUPLEX CF structure vs. use of SYS
I can reach both sites from the US.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jeremy Nicoll
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 10:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SPFLite goes Open Source
On Mon, 17 Dec 2018, at 10:31, Michael Knigge wrote:
> Nice t
There was, at one time, a product know as SAR(CA VIEW)/PC.
There was also an AFP Viewer.
Don't know if either is still marketed.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Roger Bolan
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 8:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Congratulations on reaching your life milestone!
All of your contributions will be greatly missed.
Enjoy Life, Hobbies, Grandchildren!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
John Eells
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 7:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
If you have customized IEFUSI, reassemble you customized exit.
IF not, copy SYS1.AOSB3 to SYS1.LLPALIB and re-ipl.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Sean Gleann
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Region
"But ASCII had a practical path to UNICODE because ASCII, unlike EBCDIC, kept
important code points static. EBCDIC made the irreparable mistake of
overloading common code points rather than colonizing the 256-character
wilderness as ASCII did."
Back in the day, ASCII was a 7-bit code, EBCDIC w
on is.. will COMMNDxx be parsed first or JES2's parameters..
- Vignesh
Mainframe Infrastructure
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: 19 November 2018 14:05
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Spool volume
There is
Check MAXASSIZE in BPXPRMxx
Check Check ASSIZEMAX and MEMLIMT in the OMVS segment for the UID in question
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 8:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Region size
There is no problem until JES starts to use the volume.
Once JES has used the volume, it will complain if the volume is not available
at JES start (not sure of the symtpoms, but it *WILL* complain).
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Sankaranarayan
With the use of a little bit of statistical analysis, I target 35% utilization
of CSA, ECSA, SQA, ESQA.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mark Jacobs - Listserv
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 2:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ECSA tuni
No
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Kevin Neuhaus/KBS
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 3:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Bundling several physical CP's for single-threaded Tasks
Hello everyone,
we have a LPAR with 2-3 CPs and currently 330 M
Since you don't like brown water, a RACF profile with AUDIT(ALL) should work.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim
Beck
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 11:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How to tell what allocated a dataset never open
IIRC
Coexistence/migration support was N-3 in the OS/390 days (with a new dot
release every 6 months).
My memory if very foggy about the exact time frames, bit I believe N-2 has been
in effect since about os/390 1.6
Certainly for many years.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 10:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Speaking of time change...
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 08:39:38 -0500, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
>Thanks Mike and thanks to Allan Staller, I didn't see his response in my email
>but I wanted to thank him als
ontinue to perpetuate the old behavior.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 7:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Speaking of time change...
Thanks Mike and thanks to Allan Staller, I didn
, November 4, 2018, 5:43:50 a.m. EST, Gadi Ben-Avi
wrote:
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2018 12:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Enlarging SMS SCDS and ACDS
There are several flavors of the
Autoswitch. In z/OS the commands a v xxx,as,on or v xxx,as,off
I believe there is an IODF option to make the drives switchable.
Al
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Tony Thigpen
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 3:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subje
Works great. However, everyone here has colde feet and insists on a 1 hour
moratorium.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 1:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Speaking of time change...
has anyone u
There are several flavors of the SETSMS command to move the current CDS's from
current to new.
SETSMS SAVESCDS(new SCDS)
SETSMS SAVEACDS(new ACDS)
SETSMS COMMDS(new COMMDS)
Define new (larger) datasets with IDCAMS and use the SETSMS Commads to populate
and invoke the new datasets
-Original
AMBLIST
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 12:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Is there a utility or command that will show load module
characteristics?
Seems like there should be a way to do thi
Agreed!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Arthur
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 6:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: eWEEK Article highlights weaknesses in Mainframe Security
On 30 Oct 2018 07:59:23 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message
You also need to modify /etc/rc
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Giliad Wilf
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2018 4:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: We're IST-2IDT, and switching back from UTC+3 to UTC+2 at 2AM Oct.
28th
Yes,
I did set TZ to
Yup!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Giliad Wilf
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 2:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: We're IST-2IDT, and switching back from UTC+3 to UTC+2 at 2AM Oct. 28th
Hi All,
At 2AM on Sunday, Oct. 28th, Israel is sw
torage under CICS
Allan Staller wrote:
>I have not seen a competent auditor for the mainframe in about 30
>years.
You're late. ;-)
Some auditor-bashing text in IBM-MAIN over the years:
My own pondering about auditors:
"In a galaxy far far away on a very lonely planet full of h
2c09f6008d638eb576a%7C189de737c93a4f5a8b686f4ca9941912%7C0%7C0%7C636758980813060715&sdata=jSFO0EvoVOnetVnLb2h2KMKLsCAkofs1YX64MK8qjaM%3D&reserved=0
ions.aspx&ContactID=4443
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] O
I have not seen a competent auditor for the mainframe in about 30 years.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 3:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: get ECSA key 7 storage under CICS
Aside from that
//S1 EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,PARM='TYPRUN=NORUN'
//SYSINDD *
RESTORE DSN(**) .
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jerry Callen
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 2:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: How can I list the contents of a ADRDSSU
io8AI%3D&reserved=0
;-D an
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Allan Staller
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: CTC conventions
Esteemed Listers,
I am in the process of
DU
Subject: Re: CTC conventions
Goog this, Allan: "redbook paper ficon ctc implementation." Top of the list.
First Tennessee Bank
Mainframe Technical Support
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018
Esteemed Listers,
I am in the process of adding a new LPAR to my sysplex and need some
documentation for CTC naming conventions.
Many moons ago, there existed a document with a suggested naming convention
such that device addresses could be associated with a particular LPAR and the
direction o
I would doubt there is any reason to use SWA=BELOW unless someone is chasing
the TIOT(?) chain using logic that was invalidated w/MVS/ESA.
I once has an application program that choked on this.
A relatively small source code change to use RDJFCB, instead of chaseing the
chain resolved the issue.
Repeated refrain:
The "new tools" are neither as reliable, functional, or available as those they
are replacing.
C'mon IBM, get your act together.!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Conley
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 4:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSER
I use 60 % free space. In this way, the entire contents can be replaced (if
needed) and also allows for some growth.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Blake, Daniel J [CTR]
Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 5:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re
Skip nailed it!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Monday, October 1, 2018 3:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: S106 abends after copying into LINKLIST
There are two separate problems here. (1) A link list library taki
601 - 700 of 1077 matches
Mail list logo
