an ESTAI routine passed once on a single ATTACH could potentially get
driven multiple
times as an ABEND of the parent task was propagated to various daughter
tasks?
I'd quibble about an abend being propagated to daughter tasks. I don't
think of it as "propagated" (particularly because the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 6:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Basic ESTAE and subtask question
any recovery routines defined for the originating task
any recovery routines defined for the originating task are propagated to
the new Task"
It's a good idea to look at the current level of the books for things like
that, since that's where corrections (if any) are likely to show up.
I saw Charles' reference in z/OS 2.2 KC but in z/OS 2.4 it
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 11:08:36 -0700 Charles Mills wrote:
:>I am trying to grasp the implications of "any recovery routines defined for
:>the originating task are propagated to the new
:>Task" in the ATTACH documentation. (It's under STAI/ESTAI but it's not clear
:>to me if it only applies when
I am trying to grasp the implications of "any recovery routines defined for
the originating task are propagated to the new
Task" in the ATTACH documentation. (It's under STAI/ESTAI but it's not clear
to me if it only applies when STAI or ESTAI is in effect.)
Here's my question:
A main program
