AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: zOS 2.4 migration guide
**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**
**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected
emails**
There is an APAR that provides a new setting (KCINDEX=N) that you use (after
the first time you s
There is an APAR that provides a new setting (KCINDEX=N) that you use (after
the first time you start zosmf), that keeps the i/o's down to a much more
reasonable level. Our clients that have small single frame systems (z13s,
z14-rz1), find that it cuts the startup time by almost 40%.
The
On 26/10/2019 5:49 am, Mark Charles wrote:
Hi Martin - can you explain to a non-JAVA person how I would check the Heap
settings and what some proper settings might be? I know my setup is still at
IBM defaults.
I'm skeptical that it would be a Java heap issue. Garbage collection is
a memory
Hi Martin - can you explain to a non-JAVA person how I would check the Heap
settings and what some proper settings might be? I know my setup is still at
IBM defaults.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
@Kurt - thank you for the qualification - "...but z/OS software will
continue to be serviced using PTFs and therefore using SMP/E".
I hadn't read or heard that until now. Its good to hear that that is the
case.
Sean
On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 00:49, Mark Zelden wrote:
> z/OSMF can create an
z/OSMF can create an extract of the migration information (now called "upgrade"
instead
of "migration") from the z/OSMF workflow (either z/OS 2.2 to z/OS 2.4 or z/OS
2.3
to z/OS 2.4 - whichever one you import from GitHub or both). It's in HTML
format
and quite readable with links to the
:(
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Kurt Quackenbush"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 7:51:56 AM
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: zOS 2.4 migration guide
On 10/17/2019 3:20 AM, Sean Gleann wrote:
> The idea that z/OSMF is intended to eventuall
On 10/17/2019 3:20 AM, Sean Gleann wrote:
The idea that z/OSMF is intended to eventually replace SMP is quite
depressing, but - disclosure - I remember I had similar difficulty taking
SMP on board some aeons ago... using it is almost second nature now.
What? IBM never said z/OSMF is intended
On 17/10/2019 6:20 pm, Sean Gleann wrote:
On our z14, z/OSMF takes some 60m+ EXCPs and 300 seconds of CPU time
(according to SDSF) before it can even be used...
I have been investigating this exact issue. Looking at SMF 92 records,
it appears that z/OSMF opens, reads and closes the same files
migration, 2.1 to 2.2. Then mothballing
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
Behalf Of Mark Charles
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 7:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: zOS 2.4 migration guide
I thought my situation was bad - it only takes
IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
>>> Behalf Of Mark Charles
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 7:44 AM
>>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>>> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: zOS 2.4 migration guide
>>>
&
f Of Mark Charles
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 7:44 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: zOS 2.4 migration guide
> >
> > I thought my situation was bad - it only takes 30 minutes at 100% CPU on
> my
> > test sy
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: zOS 2.4 migration guide
>
> I thought my situation was bad - it only takes 30 minutes at 100% CPU on my
> test system to bring up z/OSMF.
>
> Does anyone run this on a production system?
>
>
ubject: Re: [EXT] Re: zOS 2.4 migration guide
I thought my situation was bad - it only takes 30 minutes at 100% CPU on my
test system to bring up z/OSMF.
Does anyone run this on a production system?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
I thought my situation was bad - it only takes 30 minutes at 100% CPU on my
test system to bring up z/OSMF.
Does anyone run this on a production system?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
% the whole time.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Martin Packer
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 3:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXT] Re: zOS 2.4 migration guide
OK; I'll bite: Why not run z/OSMF?
But if you prefer to exercise your
According to the z/OS V2.4 Preview Announcemet:
CICS TS will soon be orderable in either existing CustomPac or z/OSMF
portable software instance format.
This is the first of many offerings that are planned to be delivered in the PSI
format.
You do the math...
Dana
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019
t; Sent: 16 October, 2019 10:29
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: zOS 2.4 migration guide
> >
> > OK; I'll bite: Why not run z/OSMF?
> >
> > But if you prefer to exercise your XSLT skills... :-)
> >
> > Cheers, Martin
> >
> > Mart
UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Martin Packer
> Sent: 16 October, 2019 10:29
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: zOS 2.4 migration guide
>
> OK; I'll bite: Why not run z/OSMF?
>
> But if you prefer to exercise your XSLT skills... :-)
>
> Cheers, Martin
>
> Martin P
oOvA
From: Jake Anderson
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 16/10/2019 09:06
Subject:[EXTERNAL] zOS 2.4 migration guide
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hi
I understand starting from 2.4 there won't be any migration guide. We will
have to look in GitHub to get XML
Hi
I understand starting from 2.4 there won't be any migration guide. We will
have to look in GitHub to get XML file into zosmf to look into migration
steps .
We don't run zOSMF and how do i view the migration steps for zOS 2.4 from
2.2 ?
Jake
21 matches
Mail list logo