Well, way to ignore everything actually of relevance. Good job there!
I doubt anyone really cares as much as you do about how you express yourself,
but I've been wrong before.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] Im Auftrag
von
sto...@interchip.de (David Stokes) writes:
No, that wasn't me. Not that I really dispute such facts, just the assumption
that anyone could have done much better at the time (and also provided an OS
that normal people could use fairly easily).
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: IBM
In
E36DC330434FBA4ABA45590D5370A88B076C4765@INTERCHIP-SBS.interchip.local,
on 07/24/2012
at 12:19 PM, David Stokes sto...@interchip.de said:
Yeah, right. Much better to restrict it to government and
corporations who never abuse things.
That's your proposal, not mine, TYVM. What would have
No. Starting ten years lat(t)er is your concept, not mine
Well no, not mine. I wasn't responding to you here.
I like your fantasy view of how things might have been, though.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] Im Auftrag
von
In
E36DC330434FBA4ABA45590D5370A88B076C4A24@INTERCHIP-SBS.interchip.local,
on 07/25/2012
at 12:25 PM, David Stokes sto...@interchip.de said:
No. Starting ten years lat(t)er is your concept, not mine
Well no, not mine. I wasn't responding to you here.
Well, you were responding to Joel C.
IBM is a large corporation. Different factions have been captivated by
marketing pressures since the beginning. The RD side has always been more
forth coming. For a number of years IBM-Main was accessible via INFO-Access
under hardware. It was a mirror of BAMA.UA.EDU and for me was great way
