On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 00:31:30 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>ALLOC DSN(userid.USER.ISPM) INRTDNN(MYDD) SHR
>
>So why -24 instead of -23?
>
>Changing the *3rd* key to RTDDN fixed the problem.
The word KEY is ambiguous and may not mean KEYWORD.
Total guess but considering this syntax is not
Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Jon
Perryman
Sent: Saturday, January 6, 2024 3:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF setup macro
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 17:41:45 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>I've been using BPXWDYN for allocation and concatenation, but I had a prob
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 17:41:45 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>I've been using BPXWDYN for allocation and concatenation, but I had a problem
>with an error code -24.
UNIX standards provide error codes versus z/OS typically provide an error code
and error message. There's a learning curve for
"INRTDDN, which is valid for INFO but not for ALLOC"
For alloc you must use the RTDSN(varname) parameter. But a good point, it
really should have been the same.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
: ISPF setup macro
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 13:10:27 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>I'm not trying to setuup an ISPF application environment.; I'm trying to set
>up a TSO user environment.
TSO user environment limits your options. LIBDEF is not suitable because it is
lost or replaced at v
: Friday, December 29, 2023 12:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF setup macro
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 13:10:27 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>I'm not trying to setuup an ISPF application environment.; I'm trying to set
>up a TSO user environment.
TSO user environment limits your o
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 13:10:27 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>I'm not trying to setuup an ISPF application environment.; I'm trying to set
>up a TSO user environment.
TSO user environment limits your options. LIBDEF is not suitable because it is
lost or replaced at various times. ISPxUSR is not
Thursday, December 28, 2023 9:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF setup macro
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 02:01:54 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>I'm trying to use LIBDEF as an alternative to freeing and reallocating the
>standard ISPF concatenations.
LIBDEF is commonly used to eli
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 02:01:54 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>I'm trying to use LIBDEF as an alternative to freeing and reallocating the
>standard ISPF concatenations.
LIBDEF is commonly used to eliminate the need for reallocating standard ISPF
DDs. There are situations where ISPxUSR is useful
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF setup macro
On Wed, 27 Dec 2023 19:59:26 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
What you are asking does not make any sense.
>Do the LIBDEFs with DATASET pick up SPPxUSR if there is no ID keyword?
I assume SSPxUSR actually means ISPxUSR. I can only comment from w
On Wed, 27 Dec 2023 19:59:26 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
What you are asking does not make any sense.
>Do the LIBDEFs with DATASET pick up SPPxUSR if there is no ID keyword?
I assume SSPxUSR actually means ISPxUSR. I can only comment from what I've read
because ISPxUSR does not solve my
I want to write a REXX script to initialize an ISPF session, assuming that
another script has already allocated the necessary user data sets and issue
TSOLIB. Tentatively I assume that I need
address TSO ALTLIB ACTIVATE 'USER(EXEC)'
address ISPEXEC LIBDEF ISPPLIB DATASET
address
12 matches
Mail list logo
