Charles Mills wrote:
And the answer is ...
And I hear a drrum ro! ;-D
A bug in my code was causing my software to *very occasionally* send out a
message in which the initial part of the message was malformed for the
protocol it implements. (Syslog, in the UNIX/RFC 3164 sense of
:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Lost datagrams on z/OS 1.12?
Charles Mills wrote:
And the answer is ...
And I hear a drrum ro! ;-D
A bug in my code was causing my software to *very occasionally* send
out a message in which the initial part of the message
to
me.)
Working on a fix ...
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 7:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Lost datagrams on z/OS 1.12?
Charles Mills wrote
Charles Mills wrote:
I have told the customer that it may be our problem
In all your posts, you're speaking of one? customer. Do this problem appears at
your other customers?
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
For
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 2:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Lost datagrams on z/OS 1.12?
Charles Mills wrote:
I have told the customer that it may be our problem
In all your
Charles Mills wrote:
Good question. The big problem is at one customer.
Thanks. That could helps you to narrow your search to a solution.
So the answer to your question is a little unclear. 1 or 2 customers out of 3.
Ok. Then I'm out of ideas and any possible contributions to your problem
: Re: Lost datagrams on z/OS 1.12?
Thanks all.
Filling in some gaps and answering some questions.
I've added additional trace code within the product to make certain that the
socket, sockaddr, and record length are as expected. (I already know that
the sendto() is getting issued with the correct
Not really rings the bell, but we have here some UDP applications, and
the TCP/IP UDP settings maybe different,
We had to change some maxudp... values in the TCP/IP or OMVS definition .
On 19.03.2013 20:16, Charles Mills wrote:
I've got a problem that is defying my ability to find it. I have a
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Not really rings the bell, but we have here some UDP applications, and the
TCP/IP UDP settings maybe different,
We had to change some maxudp... values in the TCP/IP or OMVS definition .
Hmmm, which leads me to some things:
Charles:
In TCP/IP, do you collect SMF
It was the UDPQUEUELIMIT we have set.
On 20.03.2013 09:33, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Not really rings the bell, but we have here some UDP applications, and the
TCP/IP UDP settings maybe different,
We had to change some maxudp... values in the TCP/IP or OMVS
the same stuff.
More to follow ...
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Miklos Szigetvari
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 12:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Lost datagrams on z/OS 1.12?
Not really
Sent: Wed, March 20, 2013 11:09:07 AM
Subject: Re: Lost datagrams on z/OS 1.12?
Thanks all.
Filling in some gaps and answering some questions.
I've added additional trace code within the product to make certain that the
socket, sockaddr, and record length are as expected. (I already know
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Lost datagrams on z/OS 1.12?
Charles,
Where was the routine compiled? Under which version of z/OS? If z/OS 1.12
or newer, make sure that you check the updates to the compiler and the
library.
They were significant
datagrams on z/OS 1.12?
Thanks all.
Filling in some gaps and answering some questions.
I've added additional trace code within the product to make certain that the
socket, sockaddr, and record length are as expected. (I already know that
the sendto() is getting issued with the correct record.) I
if the option is off. Not much I'm sure
compared to a sendto().
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Lost datagrams on z/OS 1.12
I've got a problem that is defying my ability to find it. I have a product
that uses sendto() to send UDP messages (datagrams). At one and perhaps two
z/OS 1.12 customers I have seen a problem in which what appear to be
perfectly good sendto()'s send a datagram that never arrives at its
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 3:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Lost datagrams on z/OS 1.12?
I've got a problem that is defying my ability to find it. I have a product
that uses sendto() to send UDP messages (datagrams). At one
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
I've got a problem that is defying my ability to find it. I have a product
that uses sendto() to send UDP messages (datagrams). At one and perhaps two
z/OS 1.12 customers I have seen a problem in which what appear to be
18 matches
Mail list logo
