The amount of DDF workload in this shop is minimal and yes, there are gaols to
accommodate for that work.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
Thanks Martin.
I tend to agree with the DB2 and CICS importance strategy you point out.
I would really like to debate the VEL:80 however that should be in another
thread.
Regards.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Thank you for the assurance in my thinking here.
Like you said, a policies do this and what is most likely the limiting factor
is # service class periods. My take is usually for the higher importance
workloads, I tend not to mess around with mixing them.
The intent of the note what just to get
://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Bob Morrison bob.morri...@siriuscom.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Date: 14/12/2013 13:19
Subject:Re: WLM Mixed Workload
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Thanks Martin
I have a what do you think question I would like to ask concerning mixing
workload types into a single service class.
Scenario is, I am working with a policy where the DB2 address spaces (aside
from IRLM) are running in the same service class as the CICS region tasks. The
caveat is CICS is
Get thee to _www.watsonwalker.com_ (http://www.watsonwalker.com) If you're
not a subscriber there's still white papers. There's also products like
Goal Tender that will enable you to analyze your data for your objectives.
In a message dated 12/13/2013 2:54:45 P.M. Central Standard Time,
As far as I can tell, the DP of the CICS address spaces will float depending on
the loved ones.
DB2 is just along for the ride.
My suggestion (since transaction goals are in use) is to experiment w/DB2 in a
separate service class.
BTW, are you using goals for DDF workloads?
snip
Scenario is,
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Date: 13/12/2013 21:57
Subject:Re: WLM Mixed Workload
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:44:38 -0600, Bob Morrison wrote:
I have a what do you think question I would like to ask concerning mixing
workload types into a single service class.
...
... but does anyone have an opinion?
Sure - bad idea. The more disparate the workloads, the badderer an idea it is.
