On Wed, 22 May 2013 10:07:57 +0100, Martin Packer wrote:
Wonder what happens if you manage region to goals of BOTH. Anyone using
that yet? Note: SMF30PF2 has a new(ish) bit for it.
Any region being managed to transaction goals has *always* been managed to both
- startup and shutdown use the
Any region being managed to transaction goals has *always* been managed to
both - startup and shutdown use the region goal.
I don't understand why this option was introduced - and why it is only
recommended for TORs. Guess I'd better go find some doco (pointers
gratefully accepted).
From: Horst Sinram sin...@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: why does WLM Server status change from YES to NO
Mananage to Both is intended to combine the region management of the TORs
(allowing to favor the TORs over the AORs)
Horst,
we have a single OLTP region, which is TOR and AOR together
On Thu, 23 May 2013 06:05:59 -0500, Horst Sinram wrote:
you could refer to
ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/eserver/zseries/zos/wlm/WLM2012Share.pdf
Excellent !.
Thanks Horst, more than I could have wished for, and in no time at all. If
you're re-presenting this in Boston, I'll be there seeking
we have a single OLTP region, which is TOR and AOR together.
Would you suggest managing the region using goal of transaction or both ?
Walter, in that scenario you would probably stick to TRANSACTION if you're
satisfied with the way that region is currently managed by the transactions
running
,
Date: 05/23/2013 07:46 PM
Subject:Re: why does WLM Server status change from YES to NO
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
we have a single OLTP region, which is TOR and AOR together.
Would you suggest managing the region using goal of transaction
From: Barkow, Eileen ebar...@doitt.nyc.gov
Subject: why does WLM Server status change from YES to NO
Would anyone know why the WLM SERVER status keeps changing from YES to NO?
Eileen,
very interesting query. I noticed myself this behaviour two weeks ago when I
changed my OLTP
region
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Walter Marguccio walter_marguc...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu,
Date: 05/22/2013 09:36 AM
Subject:Re: why does WLM Server status change from YES
I believe that to be correct: I've noticed both CICS and WAS address spaces
starting as SERVER=NO and transitioning to SERVER=YES once transactions have
started executing. And I've seen them transition back to SERVER=NO too.
On Tue, 21 May 2013 14:50:45 +, Staller, Allan
snip
very interesting query. I noticed myself this behaviour two weeks ago when I
changed my OLTP
region from manage region using goal of REGION to manage region using goal
of TRANSACTION.
/snip
This is well documented in the WLM Planning Guide...
HTH,
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Scott Chapman
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 6:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: why does WLM Server status change from YES to NO
I believe that to be correct: I've noticed both CICS and WAS address
Would anyone know why the WLM SERVER status keeps changing from YES to NO?
We have other tasks defined with the same SrvClass CIC_AORP and they are always
set to
SERVER YES. Does it have anything to do with the actual work load being done by
the task?
This is a CICS test region and we are trying
Most likely the level of activity within the region.
Server status, IIRC, is set by the monitored transactions flowing through the
region.
Check the WLM Planning Guide, or the relevant CICS docs.
HTH,
snip
Would anyone know why the WLM SERVER status keeps changing from YES to NO?
We have
13 matches
Mail list logo
