--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
I have a REXX which builds a member list and uses EXECIO to write each
member preceded by a ./ADD card for IEBUPDTE.
After the flat file is edited, simply use IEBUPDTE to add the members back
to the PDS using the flat file as input.
I can post the source or email it to the OP.
On 7/24/07,
Hi,
I would like to allocate memory in Common Data Space with DSPSERV Macro and
my requirement is that Data Space survive my Address Space Termination. That
means it remains allocatad after my AS ends and other Address Spaces or an
Exit-Routine can access it.
One of my trial was, to allocate
Gabor
There are various tricks you can use to do this - and most of them involve
squirreling something away in one of the always there system address spaces
without them knowing about it.
But - why does your address space have to end?
In my opinion, it would be much safer (and easier) to have
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:08:49 +0200 Gabor Hoffer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:My program (EventMonitor, EM) installs an ExitModul under IEFU83 and IEFU84
:Exit. The Code and Buffer (for SMF-Records that are collectet with Exit) are
:in ECSA. Exit and EM communicates with ECB and exchange data over
Rob,
My program (EventMonitor, EM) installs an ExitModul under IEFU83 and IEFU84
Exit. The Code and Buffer (for SMF-Records that are collectet with Exit) are
in ECSA. Exit and EM communicates with ECB and exchange data over ECSA.
There are 2 request on this architecture:
1. Able to end
As a mentioned I'm not expert in SRBs and I'm learning MVS system
programming. I'v looked for SRBs in books. If i understand it correct, i can
let an Address Space to run a code in my Address Space. Is it ok?
Gabor
ps: i did'nt ask you to code it for me.
I already told you - look up SRBs.
Gabor
One way to do it is schedule an SRB into *MASTER* and that SRB performs the
DSPSERV CREATE with TTOKEN.
However, I would still advise against this for the following reasons :
(1) There is a simpler and safer solution.
(2) It is very likely that at some point you will cause problems in
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:44:19 +0200 Gabor Hoffer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:As a mentioned I'm not expert in SRBs and I'm learning MVS system
:programming. I'v looked for SRBs in books. If i understand it correct, i can
:let an Address Space to run a code in my Address Space. Is it ok?
True. But
Rob,
Separate ASID looks for me also safer and probably I'll choose this method,
but I have to say SRB in *MASTER* sounds prettier.
(4) The fact that you have to ask the question hints that you may not be
ready to take on the task (apologies if that sounds rude).
Not to apologies, I know I
Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
[...]
I've noticed that some recent IBM manuals (maybe only Tivoli
manuals, but still IBM) no longer include the RCF or any electronic
equivalent. Is there an IBM-wide RCF (where F now stands
for function) that can be used for those manuals not providing
their own? If
True. But much more. It allows any address space to schedule work to be run
in
a different address space.
Thanks. I'll try it, but not with *MASTER*. ;-) There is a good example in
book Advanced Assembler Language and MVS Interfaces
Gabor
By the way, I applaud your decision to convert ECSA usage to a CADS - that is a
sensible solution.
Remember to maintain the usage of the blocks in the CADS - have some sort of
high water mark or max size that the installation can tailor - otherwise if
your main server address space is down for
OK, I'll bite. Why do you need to determine?
If you have any reason to think that the page is protected (presumably
because you did it or might have done it), then you can just unprotect it.
A page does not need to be protected in order to successfully unprotect.
Note that protection is not a
You're off the hook, and if you've yet taken no action, it would be
interesting to let it run its course and see whether Tech Pubs agrees
with us.
The way our ID process seems to work today (at least in Poughkeepsie),
if someone suggests a change, the book owner contacts the technical
owner to see
Can anyone enlighten me what this (EMCS) console is for? It probably appears
with z/OS 1.7 and up; we get it under 1.8 as the only console messages are
routed to that under 1.6 get broadcast to all active consoles in the sysplex.
This console was opened from CONSOLE address space, has no key,
Interesting. We have them too. I have no clue as to what they are.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
Peter Relson wrote on 2007-07-25 07:39:42:
snip
Ugghh. The z/OS MVS books (i.e., the ones I am involved with) all have a
page at the end Readers' Comments -- We'd Like to Hear from You.
I'm not sure why there is no electronic mechanism. I'll inquire.
But that is not consistent across the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
The oft-mentioned IBM WebSphere Developer for System z (WDz)
performs excellent COBOL syntax validation on your PC.
http://www.ibm.com/software/awdtools/devzseries/
You can see some recorded
I wrote on 2007-07-25 08:19:01:
I found the following in the front matter of several books from the z/OS
MVS bookshelf:
--
IBM welcomes your comments. A form for readers’ comments may be provided
at
the back of this document, or you may address your comments to the
following
Hi,
Are there any other OEM products that preform similar functions as
CA-Disk ?
TIA
Dean
Dean Montevago
Sr. Systems Specialist
Visiting Nurse Service of New York
(212) 609 - 5596
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Are there any other OEM products that preform similar functions as
CA-Disk ?
Innovation's FDR product(s).
Jeffrey Deaver, Engineer
Systems Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
651-665-4231(v)
651-610-7670(p)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the
archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
__ NOD32 2418 (20070725) Information __
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
--
For IBM
Bill,
An easy way Could you not place the CLIST in a read only dataset,
and check the userid within the CLIST against a pre-defined table
defined within the code?
Or a more involved way... you could write a quick assembler program,
executed from the clist, which could check a pre-built RACF
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 7:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Z/Journal issue June/July 2007
Today I was at another doctors office waiting for my appointment and was
surprised
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:10:56 +0100 Phil Kingston
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:An easy way Could you not place the CLIST in a read only dataset,
:and check the userid within the CLIST against a pre-defined table
:defined within the code?
:Or a more involved way... you could write a quick
Gabor
Wouldnt this design be much cleaner by starting a second address space
whose
sole purpose is to own the dataspace ?
Basically it would contain all the Data Space Code to initialize/create
and destroy the dataspace and a Console Routine to stop this Address
space.
Granted not as
Unfortunately, read only access doesn't prevent someone
from copying the CLIST and removing any userid checks
from it, whether they be a pre-defined table or a called
RACF interface.
How would the dataset open exit be invoked?
From: Phil Kingston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe
Under RACF I have placed a CLIST in a secured data set and had RACF set to
EXEC rather than READ on the data set.
Seemed to work and it did not impact the usage of the CLIST.
Lizette
Unfortunately, read only access doesn't prevent someone
from copying the CLIST and removing any userid
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:39:42 -0400, Peter Relson wrote:
I've also been informed that, to my dismay, no updates will happen to
any old books ever. Updates will be made only in the forthcoming R9
books.
For the matter that started this thread, that FIN-analogue is
sufficient. Of course, if the
We have PDSMAN in-shop, but I do not believe I can use it for this
particular change because not only is the ACCT info different in most
cases, but also because there does not now exist any standard ACCT field
info to key on and do the replace. Thus the need for the project ... not
only complete
All I can say is that in a full page spread is:
Did you know that Xephon is now a division of z/Journal?
and the rest of the page is verbage
--signed Bob Thomas---
On Jul 25, 2007, at 8:13 AM, Thompson, Steve wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
Bob Shannon
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2007 14:08
An: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Betreff: Re: Console named *DICNsysclone.
Interesting. We have them too. I have no clue as to what they are.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul D'Angelo
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 7:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DSPSERV
Gabor
Wouldnt this design be much cleaner by starting a second address space
Perhaps you are thinking of the Bob Thomas that works for IBM. However, the
publisher of z/Journal is a different Bob Thomas and he does not work for
IBM.
Chuck Arney
illustro Systems International, LLC
http://www.illustro.com
Access 3270 data from anywhere with z/XML-Host
Access 3270 apps from
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:09:42 -0600 Jeffrey D. Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: -Original Message-
: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
: Behalf Of Paul D'Angelo
: Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 7:15 AM
: To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
: Subject: Re: DSPSERV
:
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Sipples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 1:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Tools for Validating COBOL Source
The oft-mentioned IBM WebSphere Developer for System z (WDz) performs
excellent COBOL syntax validation
All I can say is that in a full page spread is:
Did you know that Xephon is now a division of z/Journal?
and the rest of the page is verbage
That's fine, but IBM Corporation does not publish zJournal.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:26:16 -0400, Bob Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the first part,
IP VERBX VSMDATA 'GLOBal SUMMary'
followed by
F '/ 8'
might be easier to deal with.
Bob
Perhaps it is a little more readable. I still liked doing a find on
KEY 8 better because using '/ 8' you
Thompson, Steve wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 7:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Z/Journal issue June/July 2007
Today I was at another doctors office waiting for my
But what was purpose of this? Was there a security exposure identified?
If so, what was it? Or was it a case of well, it's always been done
this way.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Mailing lists / online forums for IBM mainframers
Hi All !
Note : I dont know whether you people will see my message as appropriate but
theres no better place I know to discuss this issue. It doesnt matter whether
youre angry against me or happy with this but please contact me directly or
Does anyone know of a slick (accurate) way to compare two files which reside
on two seperate tapes?
Thank you
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:18:03 -0500 Chris Steffens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Does anyone know of a slick (accurate) way to compare two files which reside
:on two seperate tapes?
Simple equal/not equal? IEBCOMPR.
More complex? ISPF source compare can run batch.
--
Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL
Wouldn't IEBCOMPR work?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris Steffens
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 11:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Compare two disk files
Does anyone know of a slick (accurate) way to compare two
We just IPL'd our sand box with z/OS 1.7 and are muddling thru. One thing
I've noticed though, is in SDSF from the:
HQX7720 - SDSF PRIMARY OPTION MENU --
At the bottom of the screen, we have:
COMMAND INPUT ===
On 25 Jul 2007 08:22:06 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Binyamin Dissen)
wrote:
:Does anyone know of a slick (accurate) way to compare two files which reside
:on two seperate tapes?
Simple equal/not equal? IEBCOMPR.
More complex? ISPF source compare can run batch.
More complex comparisons can be
Mark ... that ISPF quirk ...
If you have a ISPF Primary Option of '0', you should be able to correct
that.
0 Settings Terminal and user parameters
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
WORLDSPAN, LP
Phone: 404-322-2799 FAX: 404-322-4653
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From the SDSF command line type in SETTINGS. Then remove the / from the
command line at bottom.
Thank You
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark H. Young
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
Trust me ...that's how I took care of that problem here.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Earnie Allen
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SDSF z/OS 1.7 Quirk
Mark ... that ISPF quirk
Rob Scott wrote:
By the way, I applaud your decision to convert ECSA usage to a CADS - that is a
sensible solution.
Personally, I don't like SCOPE=COMMON data spaces (CADS). Exceeding
MAXCAD requires an IPL. (The default is 50.) And, don't forget the
maximum number of entries in a
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:32:41 -0600 Howard Brazee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:On 25 Jul 2007 08:22:06 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Binyamin Dissen)
:wrote:
::Does anyone know of a slick (accurate) way to compare two files which
reside
::on two seperate tapes?
:Simple equal/not equal? IEBCOMPR.
I know this is a long shot, but I need some help and not a lot of time.
We use SYSVIEW to cut CICS records. Sysview 11,5 was installed and we
noticed 3 month later that the reports that we generate to record
transaction count, response time, and number of transactions stopped
working. This is when
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John Eells
[ snip ]
So while you can complain to us about nearly anything (smile), . . .
My boomerang won't come back. :-D
-jc-
--
For
Ed
I thought that a CADS approach to intercepting SMF records was appropriate -
like you I would not recommend a blanket replacement of ECSA with CADS.
Using CADS as a intercept record buffer from IEFU8x has a fairly short
path-length and is a safe method of performing this specific task -
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:39:03 -0400, Lizette Koehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under RACF I have placed a CLIST in a secured data set and had RACF set to
EXEC rather than READ on the data set.
Seemed to work and it did not impact the usage of the CLIST.
I can believe that would work for a data
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Scott
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DSPSERV
Ed
I thought that a CADS approach to intercepting SMF records
was appropriate -
-snip-
My boomerang won't come back. :-D
-unsnip
How's that wad of gum on the bedpost, John? :-D
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
For just such times as that (rare cases where for some reason the command
line shows up other than where I expect) .. I have a couple of clists that
I store in a system SYSPROC library.
If my command line is at the BOTTOM and I want it on TOP ...
(CMDLNTOP)
PROC 0
SET ZPLACE = ASIS
ISPEXEC VPUT
--snip--
I can believe that would work for a data set in SYSPROC, but I believe it
would not work for SYSEXEC.
It still has the problem that Binyamin noted, though. You really need to
protect access to the data or functions the CLIST performs, as otherwise
--snip
I'm likely insane, but I'd like to see some common storage like [E]CSA
in the above the bar area. Simple SAM64 to switch to AMODE(64), store
the data, then SAMxx to go back to 31 or 24 bit amode.
-unsnip---
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:51:11 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:39:03 -0400, Lizette Koehler
Under RACF I have placed a CLIST in a secured data set and had RACF set to
EXEC rather than READ on the data set.
Seemed to work and it did not impact the usage of the CLIST.
I can believe
I notice that lately (I believe this behavior is new), the E-mail
updates that I receive of PMR updates have the Abstract appended
to the Subject header. This is useful. I'll let others worry
about whether they can access IBMLink to view the update.
BTW, I notice that AST notifies me that
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:33:53 -0400, Earnie Allen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark ... that ISPF quirk ...
If you have a ISPF Primary Option of '0', you should be able to correct that.
0 Settings Terminal and user parameters
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:33:49 -0500, Mark Steely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From the SDSF command line type in SETTINGS. Then remove the / from the
command line at bottom.
Thank You
YES, that worked just fine.
I am a hater of bottom of the page command lines.
So the *menu* from the toolbar
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:38:33 -0400, Earnie Allen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For just such times as that (rare cases where for some reason the command
line shows up other than where I expect) .. I have a couple of clists that
I store in a system SYSPROC library.
If my command line is at the BOTTOM
Yeah.. noticed that ... later.
We didn't experience that when we went to 1.7 .. or when going to 1.8 a
couple of weeks or so ago.
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
WORLDSPAN, LP
Phone: 404-322-2799 FAX: 404-322-4653
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember: It takes
Eric,
DB-L is at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VMESA-L has morphed into IBMVM at LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
-mark
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Loriaux
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:30:44 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
There's just a tad bit of virtual storage up there to use. By default it
is 510T. ;-) But for a vendor to use it, they must ensure a minimum
OS level of z/OS 1.5. Since 1.6 EOS is September, developing something
new that uses shared
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:56:00 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm likely insane, but I'd like to see some common storage like [E]CSA
in the above the bar area. Simple SAM64 to switch to AMODE(64), store
the data, then SAMxx to go back to 31 or 24 bit amode.
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:36:04 -0400, Earnie Allen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah.. noticed that ... later.
We didn't experience that when we went to 1.7 .. or when going to 1.8 a
couple of weeks or so ago.
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
What I've got to figure out
If you are a SyncSort 1.2 customer. There is a simple 2 step
application that will create 3 files: additions, deletions and inserted
records. If you would like further information on how to do this please
contact me offline and I will send you a manual which demonstrates how
to do this using the
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:56:00 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm likely insane, but I'd like to see some common storage like [E]CSA
in the above the bar area. Simple SAM64 to switch to AMODE(64), store
the data, then SAMxx to go back to 31 or 24 bit amode.
There's just a tad bit
Running z/OS 1.7 -- Ran a job that creates Letters in Spanish. These
Letters do print in Spanish, when sent to a printer -- but when
displayed in SDSF, the extended attributes are missing. Any ideas.
Regards,
Jasbir
--
For
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chauhan, Jasbir
Running z/OS 1.7 -- Ran a job that creates Letters in
Spanish. These Letters do print in Spanish, when sent to a
printer -- but when displayed in SDSF, the extended
attributes are missing. Any
On Jul 25, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Wayne Driscoll wrote:
But what was purpose of this? Was there a security exposure
identified?
If so, what was it? Or was it a case of well, it's always been done
this way.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:51:32 -0500, Tom Schmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:30:44 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
There's just a tad bit of virtual storage up there to use. By default it
is 510T. ;-) But for a vendor to use it, they must ensure a minimum
OS level of z/OS 1.5.
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:27:15 -0400, Peter Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I'll bite. Why do you need to determine?
If you have any reason to think that the page is protected (presumably
because you did it or might have done it), then you can just unprotect it.
A page does not need to be
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:08:42 -0500 Paul Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:27:15 -0400, Peter Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
:OK, I'll bite. Why do you need to determine?
:
:If you have any reason to think that the page is protected (presumably
:because you did it or
Binyamin Dissen wrote on 07/25/2007 08:41:30 AM:
DFSORT can do a line compare, detecting inserts, reformats and deletes?
You can use the SPLICE function of DFSORT's ICETOOL to do various types
of matching. For some examples, see the Create files with matching
and non-matching records Smart
A real oldie but goodie is the famous LISTPDS assembler program written
by Gene Czarcinski of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in the early 70s for
the 360/95 when he was its system programmer. Bill Godfrey, my former
office mate at PRC at Goddard back in the 70s, added some nice
enhancements.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 12:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is a page protected?--how to determine
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:08:42 -0500 Paul Schuster
Then should you not protect ICKDSF itself?
If your authorised to run it in batch, then why not through TSO.
Protect ICKDSF from unauthorised users rather than execs?
Phil.
z/OS Systems Programming Consultant
Website www.zostek.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
DASDVOL profiles can help here..
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ed Gould
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 12:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Secure clist
On Jul 25, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Wayne Driscoll
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chauhan, Jasbir
John, Are you suggesting there is a separate code page for
SDSF and ISPF. I'm using ISPF as an example here because the
raw data (pds)does show extended attributes when browsed.
Though I am by no
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:28:35 -0500, John P Kalinich wrote:
The OFFLOAD subcommand offloads members of a PDS to a member of
a PDS or a sequential data set. An IEBUPDTE ./ ADD NAME=
control statement is added before each output member and ISPF
statistics are included for use by the PDSLOAD program
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:27:27 +0100, Terry Sambrooks wrote:
Historically IEBCOMPR gave up if there were 10 consecutive errors, and I
believe it still does.
What's an error? SYNAD entered? I'd give up on one of those.
-- gil
ummm, so what if someone copies it into their own clist lib, modifies the id
check code, then runs it?
Been there..had to be there actually. we had an oldie where the
original developer went off to other pursuits. my id was not
authorized..45 seconds later it was.
locks are meant to
Interview about why everyone should migrate away from the mainframe.
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/qna/0,289202,sid80_gci1265623,00.html?track=NL-576ad=598271asrc=EM_NLT_1860635uid=1900046
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 3:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe shops held hostage, Itanium alliance says
-Original Message-
From: IBM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gary Green
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]','','','')[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Gary Green
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 2:17 PM
To:
While I appreciate everyone's appreciation, I like John's analogy best. :)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]','','','')[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Green
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 2:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 3:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe shops held hostage, Itanium alliance says
-Original Message-
From: IBM
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/qna/0,289202,sid80_gci1265623,00.html?track=NL-576ad=598271asrc=EM_NLT_1860635uid=5437138
I'm just the messenger, put down the gun...
...phsiii
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Hello,
I am curious if you are using the SYSVIEW-generated SMF 110 (CMF-like subtype
1, transaction and
dictionary information) records, or are you using the native SYSVIEW CICS data
for reporting? And
are you generating these transaction reports directly from SYSVIEW or from
another
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 16:39 -0400, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
No, they're releasing a threading library (which I doubt will be of much
value to us here).
Why not? GCC under z/Linux + TBB should work
I yield! (I generally wear my z/OS hat when I'm perusing ibm-main and
my Linux hat when
Mark:
Contact me off-line for more specifics and I'll see what I can do to help.
Adam
- Original Message -
From: Mark Steely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 8:46 AM
Subject: SYSVIEW 11.5
I know this is a
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 16:15 -0400, Warner Mach wrote:
Intel is going to open-source a C++ compiler for parallel Processing
No, they're releasing a threading library (which I doubt will be of much
value to us here).
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cessna will be welding 26,000 Cessna 180's together in an effort to
compete
with the military's C-5 cargo jets...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
I don't know where you are situated at the moment but there always seems to be a
demand in some of the Asia/Pacific areas, Singapore, Hong Kong etc. Maybe you
should learn Chinese.
Stephen Mednick
Computer Supervisory Services
Sydney, Australia
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
