Re: Number of Sysprogs sysadmins per 100 MIPS

2008-09-09 Thread Alaimo Zani
You could simply refer to it as 'management by airline magazine'.
 ABZ

On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:44:36 -0500, Glen Gasior 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

*
I am going to leave off this so I do not go into a thesis on recognizing
sabotage behaviour of IT managers.
*


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Number of Sysprogs sysadmins per 100 MIPS

2008-09-09 Thread Glen Gasior
You know how it can be when the coffee hits home.

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Alaimo Zani [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 You could simply refer to it as 'management by airline magazine'.
  ABZ

 On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:44:36 -0500, Glen Gasior
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 *
 I am going to leave off this so I do not go into a thesis on recognizing
 sabotage behaviour of IT managers.
 *
 

  --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




-- 
Glen J. Gasior
(630) 712-2104
Chicago, Illinois 60611
Leadership that improves the process of change

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Number of Sysprogs sysadmins per 100 MIPS

2008-09-08 Thread Arthur Gutowski
In my experience (not that I'm much more than a tourist), I've seen staffing 
levels more as a function of how many systems, subsystems, etc., and how 
disparate they are.  More z/OS LPARs does not necessarily mean more z/OS 
SysProgs, if the images are tied together in a Sysplex, or at least common 
enough to make software rollouts somewhat textbook.  More variation means 
more time to handle each system, which eventually adds up to more staff 
(unless you're OK with high turnover).  Same goes for DB2, IMS, CICS, etc.

Benchmarks provided by Gartner and the like, don't tell the whole story, 
because every shop and workload is unique.

Regards,
Art Gutowski
Ford Motor Company IT Infrastructure

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Number of Sysprogs sysadmins per 100 MIPS

2008-09-07 Thread Timothy Sipples
Just to echo the previous responses, Gartner has some data on staffing
levels, and you may wish to check with them. To summarize, they see much
the same thing: for mainframes there's a (more or less) fixed operational
staffing level and then zero (or very near it) operational staffing as you
add workload. That is probably unique in computing and keeps getting more
important as general service sector wages and benefits increase relative to
materials and goods, and as IT activities become a larger share of total
business activities. (That's a long-term, secular, global cost trend,
although different countries are at different points on that trend.)

Also, there have been impressive operational productivity improvements over
the past several years owing to many factors, including increased
automation. Those productivity improvements seem to be fully compensating
for the capacity increases -- maybe even more than fully.

Anyway, that's my summary. Your situation may be different.

- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Architect
Based in Tokyo, Serving IBM Japan / Asia-Pacific
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Number of Sysprogs sysadmins per 100 MIPS

2008-09-07 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Gartner has some data on staffing levels

But, who trusts Gartner, these days?
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Number of Sysprogs sysadmins per 100 MIPS

2008-09-05 Thread Nagaraj_Pudukotai
Dear List

I am in search of information on typically how many system programmers and 
system administrators would be required, on an average, to support say 100 
MIPS. It is not that I am specifically looking at 100 MIPS installation, but 
rather I want to extrapolate this number (if possible linearly) to estimate the 
number of sysprogs and sysadmins required to support a site of any size - say X 
MIPS. I know the number of sysprogs and sysadmins at different sites varies 
even when comparing sites of the same size. Nevertheless I am looking for a 
rough ballpark number.

I also understand this number is a function of the subsystems installed at a 
site. For e.g. x number of DB2 sysprogs  x' sysadmins + y number of IMS 
sysprogs  y' sysadmins + z number of CICS sysprogs  z' sysadmins etc.

So what I am after is - on an average how many sysprogs + sysadmins (z/OS, DB2, 
CICS and IMS) are typically required to support on an average say 100 MIPS?


Thank you in advance.

Nagaraj





DISCLAIMER:
This email (including any attachments) is intended for the sole use of the 
intended recipient/s and may contain material that is CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVATE 
COMPANY INFORMATION. Any review or reliance by others or copying or 
distribution or forwarding of any or all of the contents in this message is 
STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the 
sender by email and delete all copies; your cooperation in this regard is 
appreciated.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Number of Sysprogs sysadmins per 100 MIPS

2008-09-05 Thread Knutson, Sam
It is not a linear function on System z. 
Scalability is part of the value proposition for the platform not just
for the machines but people's ability to manage them. 
That is not just marketing from IBM. We have doubled MIPS with
negligible staff growth for the platform. The sticky part is that is
that it takes a certain critical mass to support 24x7x365 operation of
z/OS + transaction subsystems + middleware.  Once you have that core
staffing level you can run nn more LPARS with n more MIPS without
any additional systems programming staff.

Best Regards, 

Sam Knutson, GEICO 
System z Performance and Availability Management 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(office)  301.986.3574  

Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast... 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nagaraj_Pudukotai
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 7:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Number of Sysprogs  sysadmins per 100 MIPS

Dear List

I am in search of information on typically how many system programmers
and system administrators would be required, on an average, to support
say 100 MIPS. It is not that I am specifically looking at 100 MIPS
installation, but rather I want to extrapolate this number (if possible
linearly) to estimate the number of sysprogs and sysadmins required to
support a site of any size - say X MIPS. I know the number of sysprogs
and sysadmins at different sites varies even when comparing sites of the
same size. Nevertheless I am looking for a rough ballpark number.

I also understand this number is a function of the subsystems installed
at a site. For e.g. x number of DB2 sysprogs  x' sysadmins + y number
of IMS sysprogs  y' sysadmins + z number of CICS sysprogs  z'
sysadmins etc.

So what I am after is - on an average how many sysprogs + sysadmins
(z/OS, DB2, CICS and IMS) are typically required to support on an
average say 100 MIPS?


Thank you in advance.

Nagaraj





DISCLAIMER:
This email (including any attachments) is intended for the sole use of
the intended recipient/s and may contain material that is CONFIDENTIAL
AND PRIVATE COMPANY INFORMATION. Any review or reliance by others or
copying or distribution or forwarding of any or all of the contents in
this message is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by email and delete all copies;
your cooperation in this regard is appreciated.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this
email/fax is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all paper and electronic copies of the original message.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



Re: Number of Sysprogs sysadmins per 100 MIPS

2008-09-05 Thread R.S.
Such typical value per 100MIPS has no value at all. Over years we have 
grown almost 100 times (in MIPS terms) with no staff growth.


--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland


--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl

Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy 
XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, 
nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237

NIP: 526-021-50-88
Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2008 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA  wynosi 
118.642.672 zote i zosta w caoci wpacony.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html