On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 19:42:08 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:
As usual for macros of this class, usable only in assembly language
and PL/X, the only really good, usually very current documentation is
in the prolog of the macro itself.
Read it. Then ask questions.
That might just be a less than
I have the complete 9 CD Online Library OS/390 Collection, dated September
1998, SK2T-6700-10. If anyone has any use for it, I will gladly mail them
the CDs and the IBM binder.
lol ...
I just looked at my rack - finding a -05 and a -19 (no others). The latter was
kept as it had the last
I confess to some dissatisfaction with both the tone and the substance
of Mr Day's OP.
He was seeking to use a facility about which he clearly knew nothing
in detail while|whilst complaining that its syntax was not identical
to that of its [very approximate] AMODE(31) analogue.
Moreover, the
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 14:06:04 +0200, R.S. wrote:
BTW: your allocation request was
illogical - you wanted to have 80-byte records and requested 1 byte.
Such request has to be re-interpreted or canceled. ;-)
As in:
DD LRECL=80,SPACE=(1,...),...
Seveal contributors argued that there
Zero space allocation is perfectly valid. As is SPACE (0,1) also. The
result is just as requested. In either case, the data set exists in the
VTOC but takes up no space on disk. The data set is treated as 'real',
including GRS enqueue. Hence it can be used like any other exclusively
held data
Mr. Gilmore,
You are so out of line on this that it is pathetic.
For me to try to discover if there is some way to influence memory
allocation is a reasonable approach to writing code. The fewer
the number of times my code runs thru allocation, the better it will
perform.
CPOOL
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:49:49 -0700, Skip Robinson wrote:
Zero space allocation is perfectly valid. As is SPACE (0,1) also. The
result is just as requested. In either case, the data set exists in the
VTOC but takes up no space on disk.
Ummm... no. By experiment, it allocates one track. There
Mr. Day,
I agree that further exchanges between us would not be useful: your
judgment that you can learn nothing from me is almost certainly
correct. I shall not comment on one of your posts again.
--jg
On 8/25/12, Dave Day david...@consolidated.net wrote:
Mr. Gilmore,
You are so out
I am guilty too
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Aug 25, 2012, at 4:29 AM, Shane Ginnane ibm-m...@tpg.com.au wrote:
I have the complete 9 CD Online Library OS/390 Collection, dated September
1998, SK2T-6700-10. If anyone has any use for it, I will gladly mail them
the CDs and the IBM
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:57:21 + Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com
wrote:
:John - maybe you have a better version of the IARCP64 macro than me - but I
do not see any explicit documentation about the extent size in the macro prolog
at all (my version is from z/OS 1.13).
:Perhaps you could
What's your problem, Metz? Run out of words? I'll see you later, pussy.
Eternity might be a long time, but I'm infinitely patient. Ta ta for now
CM Poncelet wrote:
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 50361ac9.1080...@bcs.org.uk, on 08/23/2012
at 12:58 PM, CM Poncelet ponce...@bcs.org.uk
11 matches
Mail list logo
