On 8/08/2018 4:15 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
What's the history of IBM-1047? Why does it seem to be controversial?
Does it have the same set of printable glyphs as IBM-037 or IBM-500?
What need impelled it?
Good question! Do you know the answer? And don't get me started on the
Isn't there a pragma tag codepage?
CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity.
Original message From: David Crayford
Date: 8/7/18 7:19 PM (GMT-08:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re:
EBCDIC (was: Json table characters)
On 8/08/2018 4:15 AM, Paul
In GSKCMS from a PDS:
#if defined(__COMPILER_VER__)
#pragma filetag("IBM-1047")
#pragma nomargins nosequence
#endif
Ditto GSKSSL and GSKTYPES.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent:
For this particular exercise/issue I do not need to consider WLM Inits.
Initially, I would like to be able to produce a list of jobs that ran
in a particular JES2 initiator.
We occasionally have an issue with S822 abends. They don't occur very
often, but when they do,
On 8/08/2018 10:34 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
Isn't there a pragma tag codepage?
Yes, and we use it, but it doesn't help if you're using the ISPF editor
to view/edit source code written in a different code page to your
emulator setting. We're doing a lot
of JSON work right now and do
On 7 August 2018 at 16:15, Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> What's the history of IBM-1047?
It was IBM's answer to the SHARE ASCII/EBCDIC Character Set [ÆCS] Task
Force report "ASCII and EBCDIC Character Set and Code Issues in
Systems Application
In 2004, MXG Change 19.269 provided an IEFU84 exit that captures
and moves the Initiator Number and Initiator Number into the
SMF 30 Subtype 1, and MXG type 30 processing picks them up.
I have no recent confirmation that exit code runs but I also
have no recent confirmations that it's in use
Is the JES2 initiator number that runs a job recorded in any SMF records??
The only "audit" trail that I can find is the $HASP373 message when a job is
started.
I would appreciate any pointers that anyone can provide.
Thanks
Tony
SMF 30 has the ASID, in case that’s useful.
Cheers, Martin
Sent from my iPad
> On 7 Aug 2018, at 20:59, Cieri, Anthony wrote:
>
>
>For this particular exercise/issue I do not need to consider WLM
Inits.
>
>Initially, I would like to be able to produce a list of jobs that ran
in a
Lizette / Alan / Martin,
Thank you all for your replies that the detailed information. It looks
like exactly what I need (and somehow missed).
It's never a bad day when you learn something new!!!
Thanks again
Tony
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Can't wait till Friday. For years I've used the analogy of a dog walking on its
hind legs. Never knew the origin. When I saw this reference to Samuel Johnson,
I got a hunch to look it up. Voila! Thanks!
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:48:30 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>>Don't we celebrate diversity.
>
>In cusine, il va sans dire. In character sets, not so much. With the advent of
>Unicode and UTF-8, I wish those other code pages would go away. Or at least
>that every OS tagged character files with the
It depends. You indicate JES2 INITs but would you also consider WLM Inits as
well?
JES2 initiators are just a place to start a job.
What specifically are you trying to work on that requires that information?
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
1) I have used a scheduling software in the past called CA Workload Automation
(CA ESP). It has a report function where I can select all jobs that had a S822
from date - to date, and then list things like Start Date/Start TimeEnd
date/End time Jobclass etc...
2) there is a parm in
This was added sometime in the z/OS 1.9-1.13 time frame (sorry don't remember
which release.
JES will automatically detect region loss and (automatically) drain/restart the
initiator.
Look up VSM CHECKREGIONLOSS(?).
It should do what you want.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Many thanks for this suggestion.
I have found a copy of IEFU84/MXGU84 in our MXG.SOURCLIB. This should
solve the audit trail issue.
Thanks again.
Tony
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Just wondering why that would be of interest. If it is anywhere it will be
in the type 30 i would think. There is an indicator that the init is wlm
managed.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Tony Cieri wrote:
> Is the JES2 initiator number that runs a job recorded in any SMF records??
>
> The
>It is kept. I have PAUSED and RELEASED a WU lots of times. Mostly, it runs
>on the zIIP, but sometimes it runs on a CP due to the zIIP being busy.
Thanks a lot. Much appreciated. This is in line with my expectation.
--
Peter Hunkeler
It is kept. I have PAUSED and RELEASED a WU lots of times. Mostly, it runs on
the zIIP, but sometimes it runs on a CP due to the zIIP being busy.
Chris Blaicher
Technical Architect
Syncsort, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
Lizette;
There's nothing "magical" or special about an SMF dump (output) dataset such
that you have to go to such extreme lengths to create one; its just a simple
physical sequential dataset with a 32K record length and either V or VBS record
format -- you can just create it using an IEFBR14
Cross-posted to IBM-MAIN and MXG-L
Out of curiosity:
Regarding the zIIP eligibility, what happens to a zIIP-eligible work unit when
it is dispatched on a CP because the zIIPs are too busy (zIIP-on CP)? Will the
work unit loose its zIIP-eligible state (flag)?
Assume the WU is dispatched on
I noticed that the Json table (array) open and close characters are not
printable ("[","]") and their hex values are z'Ad' and x'BD'. somehow,
(Hebrew) keyboards do not print these characters. What is your hex value
for these characters?
ITschak
--
ITschak Mugzach
*|** IronSphere Platform* *|*
Trying again, with better MIME headers:
On 2018-08-07, at 05:05:47, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> I noticed that the Json table (array) open and close characters are not
> printable ("[","]") and their hex values are z'Ad' and x'BD'. somehow,
> (Hebrew) keyboards do not print these characters. What
Yet again. My attachments are supposed to be utf-8. They display OK
with Mail.app, but not on the LISTSERV web site.
On 2018-08-07, at 05:05:47, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> I noticed that the Json table (array) open and close characters are not
> printable ("[","]") and their hex values are z'Ad'
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:23:41 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>The PC code pages are equally Heterogeneous, perhaps more.
>
OK. I'll hate those, too.
"Heterogeneous"? Don't we celebrate diversity.
Third time's the charm. Making both the mail body and all attachments
"charset=utf-8" got a clean
The PC code pages are equally Heterogeneous, perhaps more.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, August
On 2018-08-07, at 05:05:47, ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> I noticed that the Json table (array) open and close characters are not
> printable ("[","]") and their hex values are z'Ad' and x'BD'. somehow,
> (Hebrew) keyboards do not print these characters. What is your hex value
> for these characters?
The code points for [ and ] depend on the code page. My advice would be to use
UTF-8 whenever possible.
Also, check all of the translate tables involved, e.g., TSO/VTAM, TIOC, ISPF,
FTP.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From:
>Don't we celebrate diversity.
In cusine, il va sans dire. In character sets, not so much. With the advent of
Unicode and UTF-8, I wish those other code pages would go away. Or at least
that every OS tagged character files with the code page and did the
translations.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.)
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:29:18 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>The code points for [ and ] depend on the code page. My advice would be to use
>UTF-8 whenever possible.
>
Right. Was it ITschak or Gadi who was afflicted with a polyglot code page
(SBCS?)
Latin/Hebrew/Arabic?
>Also, check all of the
30 matches
Mail list logo
