Hello Sean,
SMS managed datasets must be cataloged. And if there is no ALIAS and the
dataset is allocated, SMS WILL catalog the dataset in the MASTER CATALOG no
matter what the security rules.
It is the subsequent delete of the bad dataset I do not understand. That should
require access
Does CA-7 enqueue EXCL to avoid duplicated tasks? What are the major names
CA-7 uses for this?
TX.
--
ITschak Mugzach
*|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Contiguous Monitoring
for Legacy **| *
--
For IBM-MAIN
[Default] On 25 Sep 2019 11:13:20 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
sme...@gmu.edu (Seymour J Metz) wrote:
>The nomenclature that a parser uses for a parse tree has nothing to do with
>the nature of the language that it parses. The format of an HTML parse tree
>constructed by, e.g., a Perl
Hi,
I get a bit confused from the records you wrote and about joinkey.
Anyway, assuming all keys are 20 bytes long and havingthis input:
+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8
DIV ORGANIC1 LOC NJ-HUNTERDON 1
DIV ORGANIC1
That is not considered a good practice in RACF circles.
The best practice would be:
MCAT - UACC(NONE) READ(*) ALTER(sysprogs) (note: No update access except
via sysprogs)
UCAT - UACC(NONE) UPDATE(*) ALTER(sysprogs)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
The presentations from September 2019’s Hillgang meeting are now available at:
https://www.sinenomine.net/news/hillgang-2019-09
Neale Ferguson
SNA - 20 Years of Customer Success
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Thank you for this, Max; with a couple tweaks on the key length, it works
just as I need it!
Have a great day!
Billy
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 4:42 AM Massimo Biancucci wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get a bit confused from the records you wrote and about joinkey.
>
> Anyway, assuming all keys are 20 bytes
W dniu 2019-09-25 o 15:57, Joao Bentes pisze:
Hi,
If memory serves me right, as long as you have ALTER to the dataset, you
need update to the catalog in order to create it, but you do not need any
access to the catalog in order to delete it.
Best Regards
"Do the difficult things while
On 9/25/2019 9:57 AM, Joao Bentes wrote:
Hi,
If memory serves me right, as long as you have ALTER to the dataset, you
need update to the catalog in order to create it, but you do not need any
access to the catalog in order to delete it.
Best Regards
"Do the difficult things while they are
WTG tables are characteristic of O/C/EOV; most type 4 SVC routines didn't have
one.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Giliad Wilf
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:29:18 -0500, David Staudacher
wrote:
If memory serves me right, the roots of Xpediter-type software are in a shop
that wrote a module that had been inserted into SVC51's (SDUMP) control flow.
In those days a large SVC routine was comprised of several pieces, each having
Hi,
If memory serves me right, as long as you have ALTER to the dataset, you
need update to the catalog in order to create it, but you do not need any
access to the catalog in order to delete it.
Best Regards
"Do the difficult things while they are easy and do the great things while
they
Hi,
Regarding the access list for UCATS, if they are for SMS datasets, you do
not need to have them with UPDATE(*); READ(*) will be enough. Only those
creating non-SMS entries will need UPDATE access.
Best Regards
"Do the difficult things while they are easy and do the great things while
While this particular case seems to have been resolved, I'd note that with
the churn in the industry, this kind of thing is hella common.
Another example: the Optim line, which IBM quietly sold to UNICOM a few
years ago, yet still markets as if it's their own. Obviously that's because
of an
Hi Sean,
This may not help with your current issue, but a couple thoughts come to mind.
Take a look at protectall. With protectall active, if there's no RACF profile
to cover TEST1, the system won't allow it to be created at all. Another thing
to check is this, do you have discrete profiles
David,
Filling in a bit of the Xpediter history, the name Centura Software was a
successor to ADS. Compuware acquired Centura in the early 1990's. At the
time, Compuware had CICS dBUG-AID. The CICS product was renamed Xpediter/CICS
to use a common name for the debuggers.
Ralph Robison
On 2019-09-25 10:54 AM, Jon Perryman wrote:
> HTML is not only not object oriented, it is not even a procedural language.
Using developer tools in any browser will show you each object with the object
attributes. HTML predefined all classes and the attributes associated with
those classes
We have TSS and it can tell exactly where a user gets/inherits a certain
authorization from. Can't RACF do the same?
Kees.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Sean Gleann
> Sent: 25 September, 2019 13:06
> To:
An even earlier reference - July 1981:
http://books.google.com/books?id=hoy5IQyLFvsC=PA46=Xpediter
I am now almost certain that Xpediter was a product Compuware did *not* develop
but rather *acquired*, some time around 1986 (the last Computerworld reference)
or after.
These articles:
Following a set of somewhat distressing events here, I discovered - the
hard way - that our master catalog was poorly protected, and so I now have
to fix it. The situation is that all users of the my system can create,
read, write, update, delete files that are cataloged in the MasterCat.
The
Sean,
I don't know about tracing RACF, but there are SMF records which can show who
accessed what and when. I have been in a similar situation, just not to the
extreme. So, what I did was to create a new Master Catalog, get the RACF
security setup, then migrate to the new Master Catalog. If
Hi Sean,
It's GTF all the way for RACF tracing:
https://developer.ibm.com/answers/questions/364448/how-do-i-set-up-diagnostics-for-running-gtf-trace/
ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/s390/zos/racf/pdf/r07_saftrace.pdf
Kind Regards,
Mark
---
Mark Hiscock
The nomenclature that a parser uses for a parse tree has nothing to do with the
nature of the language that it parses. The format of an HTML parse tree
constructed by, e.g., a Perl program, is not compatible with JavaScript.
CSS is not JavaScript, or even related to it. The objects and
Susan,
I've clicked on the link but I'm not sure what to do.
I want the PDFs installed on my hard drive (Windows 7) in book shelves.
I'd like to browse them with Adobe.
Thanks and regards, Pierre.
--
For
Hi Pierre,
The z/OS V2R3 content is not available in BookManager format, which is
why you're seeing only the Knowledge Center content in your repository.
For all releases starting with V2R1, we provide only PDF and HTML
plug-in (Knowledge Center) outputs. See
Hi,
If you want to trace a specific userid you will have to set it with the
UAUDIT attribute. That way, all of its accesses will be recorded on SMF
type 80 and you will be able to analyze it using ICETOOL or a similar
tool. There are several examples on the SYS1.SAMPLIB(IRRICE) that is
I'm sorry but Sri Hari will be unavailable for some time and not be responding.
The rest of the DFSORT support and development teams will respond as they can.
Max Smith
DFSMS Development
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:59:03 -0400, Pierre Fichaud wrote:
>Susan,
> I've clicked on the link but I'm not sure what to do.
>
I assume that's
https://www.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zosInternetLibrary
"Download all z/OS V2R3 Library publications to ZIP file".
Unzip and
Thanks, gil! Yes, that's the bulk download of all individual PDFs listed
on the z/OS V2R3 Library page (
https://www.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zOSV2R3Library
). We also provide a totally separate PDF deliverable, the "Adobe
Indexed PDF Collection." The V2R3 version is
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:59:03 -0400, Pierre Fichaud wrote:
>I want the PDFs installed on my hard drive (Windows 7) in book shelves.
Do you mean bookshelves as processed by the IBM Softcopy Reader?
If so, I think you are out of luck. I don't believe that IBM provides
bookshelf files any longer.
I will give them a try :)
But, I will again take this opportunity to plea for the return of Bookmanager
format :)
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Susan Shumway
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 12:34 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
OK, now for another twist on a request from the same department. I have a
flat file that was dumped from a VSAM file, and it contains records with
major, medium and minor breaks. I know there is a way in SORT to suppress
printing the duplicate header values, but I spent an hour in the manual and
Thanks for the update. His continued involvement carried on the tradition Frank
Yeager provided us for years. Like yelling over the cubicle "what's this mean?"
In a message dated 9/25/2019 4:26:03 PM Central Standard Time, s...@us.ibm.com
writes:
ri Hari will be unavailable for some time and
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 15:39:40 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
Well, SVC51 is a type-4 SVC and was comprised of several IGCnn05A pieces.
I think there was a limit for the size of a single piece back at MVT R21 days,
of 1K, or maybe 2K and it had to fit into something called "transient area".
You
Thanks Ralph! That clears things up quite a bit. Partly with that
information, I was able to learn a little bit more about the exact timeline.
Application Development Systems continued doing business from San Jose under
that name until about November 1989, when it rebranded as "Centura
35 matches
Mail list logo
