Echoing prior responses, Jakarta Mail (formerly JavaMail) supports OAuth2. Here
are some ways to get Jakarta Mail on z/OS:
J1. If you have at least a relatively recent release of CICS Transaction Server
for z/OS then you should have CICS Liberty with Jakarta Mail. You may also be
interested in
Brian Westerman wrote:
>The little single CPU processors don't have the boost feature.
AFAIK all currently marketed IBM zSystems servers configured with any
subcapacity CPs (general purpose processors) — including the very smallest
A01/401 capacity models — feature System Recovery Boost
A couple of points to make:
1) The “up to 70%” makes 70% a target, not a guarantee.
2) Only certain python libraries are zIIP eligible. Think about the case where
someone wraps their COBOL program in just enough C to make a python module.
Then – if we didn’t have this specific list – that
Is there any way to create a PDSE V2 with member generations in batch? I know I
can do it interactively with ISPF 3.1, and I know I can't do it in batch with
IEFBR14 and a DD, the way you would create most any other dataset.
It needs to be batch, and it would need to be "pure basic z/OS,"
https://newsroom.ibm.com/2023-06-26-IBM-to-Acquire-Apptio-Inc-,-Providing-Actionable-Financial-and-Operational-Insights-Across-Enterprise-IT
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 10:38:03 -0500, Lionel B. Dyck wrote:
>Try this - just tested and it does work. Hope it helps
>
>//PDSEALC EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
>//PDSE DD DISP=(NEW,CATLG),DSN=MYHLQ.NEW.PDSE,
>// UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(15,15),DSORG=PO,
>//
The OP asked for batch, and I assumed, perhaps incorrectly, that he wanted to
do it with JCL for a vendor product installation.
SYSDA, SYSALLDA, or 3390 - all should work as generic unit types and an
optional vol=ser=xx may be needed if SMS is not active and/or the dasd is
not mounted as
>> I know I can't do it in batch with IEFBR14
Charles,
Why can’t you run the following in batch?
//STEP0100 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
//AF01 DD DSN=,
//DISP=(NEW,CATLG,DELETE),
//UNIT=SYSDA,
//SPACE=(CYL,(1,1,5)),
//DSNTYPE=(LIBRARY,2),MAXGENS=20,
//
Try this - just tested and it does work. Hope it helps
//PDSEALC EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
//PDSE DD DISP=(NEW,CATLG),DSN=MYHLQ.NEW.PDSE,
// UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(15,15),DSORG=PO,
// DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=80,BLKSIZE=0),
//
You can also ask them to issue the operator command: D SMS,OPTIONS
Then look for MAXGENS_LIMIT = xxx
Lionel B. Dyck <><
Website: https://www.lbdsoftware.com
Github: https://github.com/lbdyck
“Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what you
are, reputation merely
When building programs under OMVS and CMS I am getting:
IEW2311E 1361 A NAME STATEMENT FOR MEMBER NOANSI WAS FOUND IN SECONDARY INPUT.
The resulting output is perfectly fine and will execute but it results in a
return code of 8. I can use -Wl,let=8 but the return code is still non-zero and
the
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 16:15:26 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>If you can't depend on the shop's ACS, then you need to use LIBRARY=.
>
Water is wet.
(ITYM "DSNTYPE=".)
--
gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
It'll fail with a IEF344I/IGD17312I messsage.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, June 26th, 2023 at 1:29 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
Regarding MAXGENS in the JCL - be sure it is less than, or equal to the
IGDSMSxx MAXGENS_LIMIT specification.
And you may want to check these (copied from my system):
MAXGENS_LIMIT(256)
PDSE_RESTARTABLE_AS(YES)
PDSE_VERSION(2)
PDSESHARING(EXTENDED)
PS_EXT_VERSION(2)
Phill,
The error msg says "certificate is not valid for IP address". It worked
until Friday before fixes applied.
*| **Itschak Mugzach | Director | SecuriTeam Software **|** IronSphere
Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitoring for Z/OS, zLinux
and IBM I **| *
*|* *Email**:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 13:56:33 -0400, Mike Shaw wrote:
>Lionel has a REXX exec handy for every purpose... ;-)
>
Subject to permission to copy, distribute, and credit.
>On Mon, Jun 26, 2023, 1:30 PM Lionel B. Dyck wrote:
>
>> You can run this exec to see what the limit is, assuming you don't have
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 12:52:56 -0500, Charles Mills wrote:
>Fails ugly!
>
Can you capture that message with "BPXWDYN( '... msg(stem.) ..."),
parse it for " MAXIMUM ALLOWED" and retry.
Credit IBM for:
o Explicit message rather than a reference to M
o Including the MAX value.
IBM is doing better
You can run this exec to see what the limit is, assuming you don't have access
to parmlib:
/* -- rexx - *
* Get the current MAXGENS_LIMIT *
* - */
NUMERIC
Fails ugly!
IEF344I STEP1 PDSE - ALLOCATION FAILED DUE TO DATA FACILITY SYSTEM
ERROR
IGD17312I THE VALUE FOR THE KEYWORD MAXGENS SPECIFIED ON THE JCL EXCEEDS
THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED BY THE INSTALLATION.
THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED IS (2).
Lionel has a REXX exec handy for every purpose... ;-)
Mike Shaw
MVS/QuickRef Support Group
Chicago-Soft, Ltd
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023, 1:30 PM Lionel B. Dyck wrote:
> You can run this exec to see what the limit is, assuming you don't have
> access to parmlib:
>
> /* -- rexx -
If you can't depend on the shop's ACS, then you need to use LIBRARY=.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 11:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: How batch create a PDSE2 with Generations?
Yeah, I have to run a test to see whether it will fail ugly if I exceed the
limit, or just cap it at the limit.
Charles
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 11:23:32 -0500, Lionel B. Dyck wrote:
>Regarding MAXGENS in the JCL - be sure it is less than, or equal to the
>IGDSMSxx MAXGENS_LIMIT specification.
>
Thanks! You're right of course. When I looked and asked about this a couple of
weeks ago no one disagreed with the assertion that it could not be done with
JCL. This is perfect. Sorry for the dumb question. Not sure what I was
searching for that I did not see MAXGENS in the JCL Reference.
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 19:00:02 -0500, Eric Erickson wrote:
>Using XL C on z/OS V2R5. I've got a set of #ifdefs in a header file that are
>not giving me the results I expect. I know on other compilers I've used in the
>past that there were options to output all input statements showing the
Ah Mike
Lionel B. Dyck <><
Website: https://www.lbdsoftware.com
Github: https://github.com/lbdyck
“Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what you
are, reputation merely what others think you are.” - - - John Wooden
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Yep. IMHO a warning message stating that MAXGENS has been set to the
installation maximum would be better.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
--- Original Message ---
Since the last ptfs applied last weekend, The server certificate CN is now
verified by Z/oS (the client). I know it is a normal behaviour of TLS, but
it has never been performed by z/os before.
Does anyone know which PTF made the change?
*| **Itschak Mugzach | Director | SecuriTeam Software
Sounds like an RFE (or is it an Idea now).
Lionel B. Dyck <><
Website: https://www.lbdsoftware.com
Github: https://github.com/lbdyck
“Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what you
are, reputation merely what others think you are.” - - - John Wooden
Itschak Mugzach wrote:
>Since the last ptfs applied last weekend, The server certificate CN is now
>verified by Z/oS (the client). I know it is a normal behaviour of TLS, but
>it has never been performed by z/os before.
Eh? What you're saying makes no sense. Of course the server cert is
IP. I thing changed until Friday's IPL.
בתאריך יום ג׳, 27 ביוני 2023 ב-0:58 מאת Shawn Prenevost <
shawnprenev...@gmail.com>:
> Is the cert for a DNS and not an IP address?
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023, 4:48 PM Itschak Mugzach <
> 0305158ad67d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> > We use
Is the cert for a DNS and not an IP address?
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023, 4:48 PM Itschak Mugzach <
0305158ad67d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> We use htwtconn and the message is returned during handshake. It is also
> written to trace if running in verbose mode.
>
>
> בתאריך יום ג׳, 27
> Water is wet.
It may be obvious from reading the DD chapter of the JCL manual, but the OP was
not aware of it.
> (ITYM "DSNTYPE=".)
DSNTYPE=(LIBRARY,2)
The 2 is required.
Of course, the OP could use DYNALLOC, or any of the facilities that front-end
it.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
On 26/06/2023 8:13 pm, Timothy Sipples wrote:
That said it's typically a "really good idea" to configure machines
running z/OS with at least one zIIP — and not just for z/OSMF but for
myriad other reasons.
I've said it before but I'll say it again - to avoid embarrassment
alongside 5 year
We use htwtconn and the message is returned during handshake. It is also
written to trace if running in verbose mode.
בתאריך יום ג׳, 27 ביוני 2023 ב-0:38 מאת Phil Smith III :
> Itschak Mugzach wrote:
> >The error msg says "certificate is not valid for IP address". It worked
> >until Friday
Yes your java executables need to be mounted I'm not sure if that mean OMVS
needs to be fully initialized... but Java would spawn USS task I imagine.
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023, 9:18 AM Gord Tomlin
wrote:
> On 2023-06-23 19:08 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> > Does Java depend on OMVS? I've seen
Ah, it's connecting by IP address. That's.ugly. Most CAs apparently won't issue
a cert for an IP. So I guess I'm not surprised it won't connect-I'm more
surprised it would before!
I hate it when people ask this, but: why are you doing it this way?
I haven't used z/OSMF myself so bear with me, but if it runs as a java
application, doesn't that allow the possibility of running some kind of
agent on the mainframe, and moving the heavy stuff (whatever that is)
off to a 5 year old laptop?
On 6/26/2023 4:21 PM, Andrew Rowley wrote:
On
In my limited (non-mainframe) experience with OpenSSL, I think it's up
to the application to decide whether to check the common name in a
validated cert with, say, a URL or IP address string. So it could be an
older application didn't bother, and a newer one does. Just guessing.
On
Itschak Mugzach wrote:
>The error msg says "certificate is not valid for IP address". It worked
>until Friday before fixes applied.
That's an error from gsk? Or what? What's the return code? I don't see that
error in the doc.
Maybe the DNS would work
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023, 5:00 PM Itschak Mugzach <
0305158ad67d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> IP. I thing changed until Friday's IPL.
>
> בתאריך יום ג׳, 27 ביוני 2023 ב-0:58 מאת Shawn Prenevost <
> shawnprenev...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Is the cert for a DNS and
On 27/06/2023 11:52 am, Tom Brennan wrote:
I haven't used z/OSMF myself so bear with me, but if it runs as a java
application, doesn't that allow the possibility of running some kind
of agent on the mainframe, and moving the heavy stuff (whatever that
is) off to a 5 year old laptop?
Not
Processor capacity index.
בתאריך יום ג׳, 27 ביוני 2023 ב-8:49 מאת kekronbekron <
02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>:
> QQ - what's a PCI?
>
> - KB
>
> --- Original Message ---
> On Tuesday, June 27th, 2023 at 10:37 AM, Timothy Sipples <
> sipp...@sg.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> >
I wonder why IBM didn't build z/OSMF to run on a PC and just let it communicate
to z/OS? That would have been pretty cool.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Andrew Rowley wrote:
>I've said it before but I'll say it again - to avoid embarrassment
>alongside 5 year old laptops or perhaps even a Raspberry Pi, IBM needs
>to figure out how to bring the smallest z/OS systems up to a modern
>configuration - I would suggest minimum 4 processors and 200 MSU.
I manage 3 sites that each have a z13s with no specialty processors, they were
deemed unnecessary at the time of the purchase, and at the time IBM didn't
disclose that shortly afterwards they would be shifting to z/OSMF which all but
locks them out of installing the next release.
Possibly
QQ - what's a PCI?
- KB
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, June 27th, 2023 at 10:37 AM, Timothy Sipples
wrote:
> Andrew Rowley wrote:
>
> > I've said it before but I'll say it again - to avoid embarrassment
> > alongside 5 year old laptops or perhaps even a Raspberry Pi, IBM needs
I used z/OSMF on a z13s from 2018 till the end of 2022. Since then it's on a
z15 T02. I have not found performance to be an issue. It was really bad in the
early days before it exploited Liberty Profile, but much better after that.
Neil.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
47 matches
Mail list logo
