costs when that micro-management is done less
than perfectly).
Joel C Ewing
On 06/20/2012 11:12 AM, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] wrote:
George,
It might help to know what you're trying to accomplish by doing this.
Given the size of today's disks, there is no guarantee that placing
on the last used volume of the data set (so a
multi-volume primary allocation used for a very small dataset could
consume a large amount of pool space on subsequent unused volumes even
after RELEASE).
Joel C Ewing
On 06/21/2012 03:56 PM, David Betten wrote:
I personally prefer using a volume count
On 06/21/2012 06:42 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
From: Joel C. Ewing jcew...@acm.org
And better yet, also use a DATACLAS with the Extended attribute so you
are not constrained to only 16 extents per volume.
With Space Constraint Relief. Extended attribute, and Dynamic Volume
Count, both primary
On 06/21/2012 07:47 PM, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
On 06/21/2012 06:42 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
From: Joel C. Ewing jcew...@acm.org
And better yet, also use a DATACLAS with the Extended attribute so you
are not constrained to only 16 extents per volume.
With Space Constraint Relief. Extended
--
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
to read 2007 files:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/word-help/open-a-word-2007-document-in-an-earlier-version-of-word-HA010044473.aspx
Alternatively, the sender might be able to use save as in Word and
save it to a Word 2002 file format.
Regards
Andrew Rowley
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR
, but also generally requires knowledge that others don't
need access to the file during this process.
Joel C. Ewing
On 07/19/2012 10:45 AM, Yifat Oren wrote:
Hi,
Like others have suggested BLSR or SMB ACCBIAS=DO is the way to go if the
VSAM is accessed in a non-sequential manner (which seems
or
calculated by VSAM) may be grossly inaccurate, making my estimates of
average records per CI equally inaccurate.
Joel C. Ewing
On 07/19/2012 10:53 AM, Sambataro, Anthony (NIH/NBS) [E] wrote:
In addition to more buffers, would a re-org help? Any CI/CA splits?
-Original Message
at the time buffers are allocated to understand how the
program will really be accessing the file. I knew there was a good
reason I avoided BUFSP.
Joel C. Ewing
On 07/19/2012 01:49 PM, Brown, Larry - RD, St. Louis, MO wrote:
Wow, the programmer dropped the bufsp parm, and his run time actually
/deactivating LPARS, so there is
no way a production image could be selected for deactivation or IPL when
a test image is intended.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
...
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
bought by a major
TelCom for them to have been granted an exclusive monopoly on the
Internet, totally changing its character. No one else in Congress was
pushing for expanded information access at the time. That's why Vint
Cerf gives Al Gore credit.
Joel C. Ewing
On 07/23/2012 04:11 PM, Steve
that you might have hardware
it couldn't tolerate. If those problems prevented you from getting on
the Internet to find solutions you were S.O.L.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN
this seems an unlikely
explanation for what the site is observing.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
of implementation!
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
overlays. The pdf text data source can either be a
Physical Sequential dataset, or a member of a PDS.
The TXT2PDF program can also be used apart from XMITIP if you want to
save a PDF form of a text document on z/OS.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
yourself a bit more.
--
zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
, it intercepted when the module was loaded,
found any STCK instructions and changed them such that their code would
happen.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Comment embedded
On 09/10/2012 07:12 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:20:46 -0500, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
Ways other than STCK/STCKE for getting time involve an SVC, or calling a
system service, or calling a subsystem service (CICS), where
front-ending the service
transfer was available and the experience
in those few cases was frequently unpleasant by comparison.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
account via
SMTP by only getting your email address. No password required. Web
pages do require passwords to access your account.
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
...
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, arjcew...@acm.org
. IARCP64 and IARST64 are implemented
based on the algorithms described here:
http://www.google.com/patents/US20090100243
Jim Mulder z/OS System Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie, NY
...
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
hardware and encouraging users
to stay on non-IBM hardware. If the termination of Pacbase support was
indeed imminent, that may have been the real reason that forced the
migration decision by Ohio.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
described as ACTION HOLD data on
the PTFs that require it. You shouldn't have to hunt down some ancient
Informational APAR. If there is some reason IBM recommends not
applying the affected PTFs, that should be handled by some means other
retaining the element RMID mismatch.
--
Joel C. Ewing
that test system cannot touch prod drives or other
prod resources by accident and there are no cross system enqueues or
other unintended cross-system communication to confuse things.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
cache, and then also have
potential concerns about how long it might take to physically de-stage
the cache data in the event of a system shut down?
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN
if the resolution
had taken a significant effort on our part and finding an APAR
resolution would be an obvious benefit for others (and if we didn't want
to fight the same problem in the next product release).
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
data sets are isolated to specific user
catalogs and not mixed indiscriminately with non-tape data sets.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
proprietary formats) at
http://www.mobileread.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70921.
Howard Turetzky
Ricoh/InfoPrint
...
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
made any more difficult by an empty file. Having
actual data may make it possible to verify that known data set attributes are
consistent, but would in general be inadequate for unambiguously determining the correct
data set attributes if they are unknown.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR
, it is subject to random ABEND failures if its execution
conflicts with other PDS update activity that also uses SHR allocation
of that PDS.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
. We used this for years to
generate and print a daily CPU performance graph from SMF CPU data until
the cost of GDDM-PGF became excessive and better alternatives were by
then available.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
time.
Joel C Ewing
On 10/03/2013 09:46 AM, Bass, Walter W wrote:
I fail to see why you would expect an abend if the member was being edited in
ISPF when it was deleted in batch. My expectation was that the batch delete
would work fine and that user performing the ISPF edit would
On 10/03/2013 02:52 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 12:11:55 -0500, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
To test this properly requires either extraordinary timing ability, or
getting a program which will OPEN a PDS for output without the
appropriate ISPFEDIT enqueue and keep it open for long
there
may be a much higher conflict potential.
Joel C. Ewing
On 10/03/2013 04:31 PM, Bass, Walter W wrote:
Ah - OK. Somewhere back in the mists of time I was once aware that the Edit
SAVE only enqueued the PDS momentarily, but I failed to recall that fact when
needed.
So the abend
invocation in split screen was not allowed and would produce a failure
message..
Joel C. Ewing
On 10/05/2013 07:59 AM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Please post your JCL statements where your SMPTABL is coded.
Next, check that ALL of the libraries on the DD statement where your SMPTABL
is coded
you to
eyeball specific SMF record types, and that should be pretty definitive
as well.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
ALLOC F(SMPTABL) DA('DCTR.SGIMTENU') SHR REUSE ???
Sure looks like that may destroy your intended Logon proc SMPTABL
allocation.
Joel C. Ewing
10/05/2013 10:07 AM, saurabh khandelwal wrote:
Hello Lizette,
Thanks for response .Below is my logon proc containing
may have introduced some
garbage members.
Joel C. Ewing
On 10/05/2013 10:50 AM, saurabh khandelwal wrote:
Hello Joel,
Initially I also thought same but not sure how can I confirm
that this dataset been destroyed.
Data Set Name . . . : DCTR.SGIMTENU
General Data
, possibly to
the point other useful I/O would be degraded. One would expect any
overhead or contention effects associated with an inappropriate JOBLIB
to be less significant with today's hardware and with PDSE libraries,
whose directories may be cached in main memory.
Joel C Ewing
On 10/26/2013 07:37
consideration to web-page display efficiency
early in the game!
Joel C. Ewing
On 10/30/2013 10:23 AM, DASDBILL2 wrote:
Thanks for the link, Jim. I am reading through the article now. The first
seriously GLARING problem I see is that It seems they forgot to merge CSS
and JS files together
sophisticated optimizing compiler in the future to deduce
that copyright_text is expendable and ignore it? Maybe some languages
need a formal element attribute to say useless but keep.
Joel C. Ewing
On 10/31/2013 12:55 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
I wanted to test my notion before presenting
the
same tracks, not on ordinary reads and writes involving the tracks of
either the source or target.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
)
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On 11/07/2013 12:04 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:06:14 -0600, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
I share your celebration of the IF Statement; although I have been bit
on one occasion by a non-intuitive behavior of IF statements as well:
the first EXEC in a JOB is always unconditionally
(this was done all the time during
Y2K testing), but you do have to follow all the rules.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
installation) have done rigorous RSU-level testing.
Joel C. Ewing
On 11/22/2013 05:30 PM, Mike Schwab wrote:
How about not until IBM tells you to? As in you must accept
before apply this PTF?
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com
wrote:
IMO
and it won't really matter when you make the
change during off-peak weeks.
Joel C Ewing
On 12/05/2013 02:09 AM, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM wrote:
Suresh,
Maybe Mike went home, so I will answer your question:
IBM will always charge the peak of the month, no matter how you changed
the MSUs
versus an EBCDIC character value, and behave
accordingly, but this is only plausible in specific instances. Typically
only one specific data format is expected, that format must be supplied,
and the documentation should reflect that requirement.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew
.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
, then this parameter value is mis-named.
Joel C. Ewing
On 12/30/2013 03:03 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 12:37:36 -0800, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
Is there any reason why I would not prefer binary/record over
ebcdic/blocked?� The former seems to make much more sense, since
platform of which the virus writer was ignorant: the popular movie
Independence Day has the same fault.
Joel C. Ewing
On 01/03/2014 12:40 PM, Ken Hume IBM wrote:
Has anyone else read Digital Fortress by Dan Brown?
Hmm.
...
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR
on these platforms in the
past may have been responsible for originating the
fix-after-multiple-failure mentality, since a single failure could
always be written off as a random hardware glitch.
Joel C. Ewing
On 01/06/2014 02:42 PM, Dan Skwire wrote:
I have written a book that explains
, but these were
always non disruptive to the data and to z/OS.
Joel C. Ewing
On 01/08/2014 07:16 AM, John McKown wrote:
Back in the z890 days, we had a CPU fail. Of course, the hardware
automatically recovered and we only knew about it due to a logrec record
being written and a message
address spaces instead of globally, but which may be subjected
to 1000's of load requests in a short time frame. From Peter's
viewpoint these would be user libraries since they are not owned by
z/OS but by applications that run under z/OS.
Joel C. Ewing
On 01/09/2014 02:11 PM, Frank
for a specific hardware model and not tied to the
number of bits in a memory address.
I would expect the fetch time for the same sequence of instructions on
the same model processor to be independent of run-time address mode.
Joel C. Ewing
On 01/22/2014 01:57 AM, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
64 bit
system symbols.
If for some reason a vendor needed to have a system symbol defined for
their product, I would think the only safe way to avoid conflicts would
be to allow each installation to customize the name when the product is
installed.
Joel C. Ewing
On 01/22/2014 01:13 PM, Paul Gilmartin
prefixes.
Joel C. Ewing
On 01/23/2014 02:52 PM, Neil Duffee wrote:
[insert Digest caveat]
Well, will you look at that! *grin* I seem to recall that the panels were,
at one time/version, in KB but I notice my current v1.12 help does, indeed,
indicate MB. In fact, it also indicates
for
their needs just a few years down the road. I would suspect a logical
mind, interest in continuing education, and a general fascination for
computers are still the most critical skills for a good Systems
Programmer.
Joel C. Ewing
On 01/31/2014 10:46 AM, Stephen Bielskie wrote:
I was fortunate
And if you follow what ought to be standard practice of applying but
NEVER accepting a USERMOD (so it can always be RESTOREd if necessary),
then the DLIB specified will never be used for storing the modified
ICHRDSNT MOD anyhow, since a store into a DLIB only occurs on ACCEPT.
Joel C Ewing
the controlled placement of
VTOC, VTOCIX, and VVDS these days is more a matter of aesthetics and
emulated-media fragmentation avoidance than performance.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
is to have conditionally executed steps at the end of one job submit the
following job, and somehow make the appropriate person aware of any
failure in the process.
Joel C. Ewing
On 05/01/2013 07:38 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
I am NOT a shop sysprog so take this with a grain of salt but my
of knowledge
any way. I am not very JES3 literate, but I've heard that it solves this
problem with DJC (Dependent Job Control). And, of course, not letting a job
into an initiator when it would cause a JOB WAITING FOR DATA SETS message.
...
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew
equipment shuffle was judged to be the victim of an error
waiting to happen (and continued to be a valued employee).
Joel C. Ewing
On 05/02/2013 12:03 AM, Ed Gould wrote:
DASDBILL2:
Yes I know about the option. My question is why would anyone want to
have it allowed.
Trying to resolve
. There surely must a programming language
somewhere with direct support for such an output format. I'm just not
personally aware of any.
Joel C. Ewing
On 05/02/2013 12:34 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
Or phrasing the question differently:
consider the integer 4560. It may be expressed as
4.56 x 10**7
, we even have
precise notation for 1000*1024 as KKi (which makes it more precise,
but still aesthetically displeasing).
Joel C. Ewing
On 05/03/2013 05:08 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
Shmuel,
I always used K, with the understanding it was 1024 ...if you write assembler a
base register used
, and more
sophisticated operating systems largely removed users and application
programmers from having to think in base 2 to effectively use binary
hardware, slower decimal-oriented hardware was considered better than
binary by many business customers.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR
of the weird, confusing things that used to be possible,
either deliberately or by accident, was that one could end up with an
orphaned (but still functional) alias entry that pointed to a
different TTR and data than the TTR in the then-current entry for the
main member name.
--
Joel C. Ewing
eventually replaced
ternary development in the Soviet Union as well.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
the costs of the
hardware itself.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM
.
Joel C. Ewing
On 05/16/2013 07:08 AM, zMan wrote:
First sentence: What?
Second: It might. That's certainly the hobbyist's argument. IBM doesn't see
it that way, clearly.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
You run just about any system in vbox
, overall availability of the system is more
important than just the convenience of an individual user.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
to reuse the
inadequate-sized existing dataset and blow again.
Even if the FTP sender knew the size of the dataset and communicated
that to the receiver, the FTP receiver would have to assume any value
sent was informational only and not to be fully trusted.
Joel C. Ewing
On 05/25/2013 11:50
relate to JCL allocation parameters, and
that after taking that correspondence into consideration standard z/OS
data set allocation and extension rules apply.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM
documented compatibility
issues with old source code and previously compiled code.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
something only known by the individual, not solely based on something
they possess.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
for HSM
migration bumps at midnight local time (which means a 1-day-old
dataset might actually only be seconds old just after midnight).
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
are not.
Does
anyone know if this is a proprietary thing?
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
...
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN
every release always has a number of fix PTFs, some of
which address problems that were highly fatal to one or more installations.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
with a UID-related profile violates the spirit if
not the letter of the UNIX standards.
Joel C Ewing
On 06/18/2013 07:04 AM, John McKown wrote:
I've had it change on occasion. But it may well have been done due to my
messing around with RACF definitions. I don't remember ever reading in the
books
begin to get
Short-On-Storage. Those CICS Server services are only available in a
CICS server region, not in batch, which complicates the design of any
subroutine which needs to run in both environments.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
in the DFSMSdss Storage Administration
Guide under DFSMSdss handling of the data-set-changed indicator during
restore.
Joel C. Ewing
On 07/17/2013 06:12 AM, Richard Marchant wrote:
New David and original David,
You are correct you can add the RESET parameter to a DSS dump be it
dataset(s
.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Old usercatalogs with IMBED and REPLICATE
W dniu 2013-07-16 21:19, Ted MacNEIL pisze:
Preach all you want.
It's management who sets priorities.
That's me.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
unavailable
solely for the purpose of removing these attributes.
--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
ee...@us.ibm.com
...
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN
they ask you to create
cross-links to some libraries, so DB2 CSI has a DDDEF to SYS1.CSSLIB,
etc.
12. No consistent (included in SMP/E) way for samples customization. I
mean HLQs, dzone, tzone, etc.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
they believe they will be able monitor everyone else's
cloud activities more easily if they are managed by Amazon rather than IBM.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
also end up spreading the data over
more real physical tracks on the DASD subsystem, which would surely
raise the overhead there as well, even if that impact on performance
might be hard to measure.
Joel C Ewing
On 07/23/2013 12:20 PM, Eric Bielefeld wrote:
I believe that the net result
, the short answer is from the user's standpoint the systems
choice seems arbitrary, is most often not usually what the user would
prefer/expect to see, and there is no interface to allow the user or
system programmer to control the systems choice.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew
(15,143,79,207,47,175,111,239,31,159,95,223,63,191,127,255)
which are consistent with the original macro.
Joel C. Ewing
On 07/24/2013 12:54 PM, Kenneth Wilkerson wrote:
The macro at the end of my reply will generate a reverse translate table. I
tested it enough to see that it looked right but it has nothing to do with
my original
don't panic at their
first exposure!
Joel C Ewing
On 07/25/2013 09:13 AM, Victor Gil wrote:
Here's a single DC instruction I've posted May 2003 [search for what's your
most difficult assembler concept]
BYTE_FLIP DS 0CL256
TDC 256AL1*-T)/001)-((*-T)/002)*2)*X'80
for the plugboard emulator program and moved
that function into hardware.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
book, or has it been there all along?
I wouldn't like to keep paging up and down online either, so I'd like to see
if there is something to be done about it.
-Marna WALLE
z/OS System Installation
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
for the possibility of 256K transfers
with 32K logical blocks, that suggests a minimum somewhere between 9 to
16 buffers.
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
they are not. What, for example, does 'track
oriented' mean when the underlying architecture is FBA? When the
underlying architecture is random-access storage?
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
outstem.0 to the counter on loop exit. (I would
still be inclined to set outstem.0 for tracking purposes even though the
EXECIO doesn't use it in the code shown)
Joel C. Ewing
On 08/26/2013 01:21 PM, George Shedlock wrote:
Gentle Listers;
I am trying to write a Rexx routine that takes in 3
prior
outstem values each time.
JC Ewing
On 08/26/2013 08:57 PM, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
The problem is
outstem.=0
which sets an infinite number of instances of outstem.x to the non-null
value 0 for all x. DISKW from a stem variable does not stop based
on a count in outstem.0, it stops
divides on word boundaries, I think the original version would drop
intentional leading blanks in a line).
Joel C. Ewing
On 08/27/2013 07:45 AM, George Shedlock wrote:
To All:
First, the output dataset was created immediately prior to executing the
exec. It was defined as a standard FB
reference wouldn't make sense, since tape data set names
aren't required to be cataloged and might not be unique even within the
same job step!
--
Joel C. Ewing,Bentonville, AR jcew...@acm.org
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
that might be close together but
on different records.
Syncsort MAXSORT is a new feature only in comparison to very ancient
usage of tape SORTWK. MAXSORT has been around for at least 15 years,
maybe longer.
Joel C Ewing
On 09/03/2013 01:29 PM, Roger Steyn wrote:
Yes . That would work fine
1 - 100 of 482 matches
Mail list logo
