Re: $HASP003 RC=(136) with $MSPL

2018-05-21 Thread Art Gutowski
Lucas,

Thank you!  That is exactly what I was looking for.  I normally would have 
humbly accepted "RTFM" as a response, but I'm not sure I would have found it.  
The manual (in KC and the online PDF) doesn't describe it in a way that's 
intuitive to me, and the example they give:

$dspl(*),unitdata
$HASP893 VOLUME(SPOOL1)
$HASP893 VOLUME(SPOOL1) UNITDATA=(EXTENT=00,TRKRANGE=(0087,
$HASP893 0293),RECMAX=12,TRKPERCYL=15)
$HASP893 VOLUME(SPOOL2)
$HASP893 VOLUME(SPOOL2) UNITDATA=(EXTENT=01,TRKRANGE=(0001,
$HASP893 001E),BASETRAK=0E,RECMAX=10,
$HASP893 TRKPERCYL=15)
$HASP646 2.5225 PERCENT SPOOL UTILIZATION
Unit-specific information about spool volumes SPOOL1 and SPOOL2 is displayed. 
Note that SPOOL1 is using absolute addressing and SPOOL2 is using relative 
addressing.

doesn't match what my system tells me (which is fortunately displayed just as 
plainly as you described):

$DSPOOL,UNITDATA
RESPONSE=
 $HASP893 VOLUME(vv)
 $HASP893 VOLUME(vv)  UNITDATA=(EXTENT=00,TRKRANGE=(,
 $HASP893 ),RECMAX=12,TRKPERCYL=15,
 $HASP893 ATTRIBUTE=ABSOLUTE)

I'm glad IBM improved the display.  Hopefully the doc caught up in v2r3...

Art

On Thu, 17 May 2018 18:39:29 -0300, Lucas Rosalen  
wrote:

>Hello Art,
>
>I think $DSPOOL(vv),UNITDATA would show that information in ATTRIBUTE
>parm.
>
>---
>*Lucas Rosalen*
>rosalen.lu...@gmail.com / lucas.rosal...@ibm.com
>http://br.linkedin.com/in/lrosalen

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: $HASP003 RC=(136) with $MSPL

2018-05-17 Thread Lucas Rosalen
Hello Art,

I think $DSPOOL(vv),UNITDATA would show that information in ATTRIBUTE
parm.

---
*Lucas Rosalen*
rosalen.lu...@gmail.com / lucas.rosal...@ibm.com
http://br.linkedin.com/in/lrosalen


2018-05-17 18:15 GMT-03:00 Art Gutowski :

> I've been playing around with $MIGRATE SPOOL, and have had a few degrees
> of success, however, on some of our rather archaic systems, I get:
>
> $HASP003 RC=(136),M 775
> $HASP003 RC=(136),M SPL(vv)  - Command is not allowed on a
> $HASP003target volume with this format.
>
> This is a MERGE operation...both volumes are ACTIVE.  I have read through
> the various restrictions, and the messages book.  While the plain text is
> useful, it falls short of specifying the disallowed format.  If I had to
> guess, and I don't like to guess, I'd say that my target volume is using
> absolute, rather than relative addressing.  I have tried migrating to each
> available target volume in the configuration, all with the same results.  I
> would assume therefore, that my source volume is also absolute, and hence a
> MOVE operation to a new volume would fail as unceremoniously.
>
> Is there any way for me to know for certain that these volumes are
> absolute, rather than relative?  The $DSPOOL,MIGDATA, while useful for
> selecting a target with sufficient space, does not provide this
> information, and I do not see anything in the SDSF SP display to indicate
> addressing mode.
>
> Follow up question, if I allocate and format a new spool, leaving it
> ACTIVE for a MERGE, will it default to absolute addressing like the others,
> or will it use relative addressing?  I fear offload and COLD start might be
> my only way around this mess...
>
> I am at z/OS 2.2 JES2, $ACTIVATE=z11, LARGEDS=Allowed, CYL_MANAGED=FAIL.
>
> Thanks,
> Art Gutowski
> General Motors, LLC
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


$HASP003 RC=(136) with $MSPL

2018-05-17 Thread Art Gutowski
I've been playing around with $MIGRATE SPOOL, and have had a few degrees of 
success, however, on some of our rather archaic systems, I get:

$HASP003 RC=(136),M 775
$HASP003 RC=(136),M SPL(vv)  - Command is not allowed on a
$HASP003target volume with this format.

This is a MERGE operation...both volumes are ACTIVE.  I have read through the 
various restrictions, and the messages book.  While the plain text is useful, 
it falls short of specifying the disallowed format.  If I had to guess, and I 
don't like to guess, I'd say that my target volume is using absolute, rather 
than relative addressing.  I have tried migrating to each available target 
volume in the configuration, all with the same results.  I would assume 
therefore, that my source volume is also absolute, and hence a MOVE operation 
to a new volume would fail as unceremoniously.

Is there any way for me to know for certain that these volumes are absolute, 
rather than relative?  The $DSPOOL,MIGDATA, while useful for selecting a target 
with sufficient space, does not provide this information, and I do not see 
anything in the SDSF SP display to indicate addressing mode.

Follow up question, if I allocate and format a new spool, leaving it ACTIVE for 
a MERGE, will it default to absolute addressing like the others, or will it use 
relative addressing?  I fear offload and COLD start might be my only way around 
this mess...

I am at z/OS 2.2 JES2, $ACTIVATE=z11, LARGEDS=Allowed, CYL_MANAGED=FAIL.

Thanks,
Art Gutowski
General Motors, LLC

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN