Martin Packer wrote:
I can't find anything that suggests BLSR is a DYNAMIC Subsystem - and I don't
think we have time for an IPL before we have to make changes. (I'm not 100%
certain we absolutely can't.)
The narrow question is whether BLSR is a Dynamic Subsystem or not. Wider
answers
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:37:11 +0100, Martin Packer wrote:
I can't find anything that suggests BLSR is a DYNAMIC Subsystem - and I
don't think we have time for an IPL before we have to make changes. (I'm
not 100% certain we absolutely can't.)
The narrow question is whether BLSR is a Dynamic
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From:
Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
To:
IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu,
Date:
09/11/2012 11:18 AM
Subject:
Re: Is The Batch LSR Subsystem Dynamic?
Sent by:
IBM
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:50:08 +0100, Martin Packer wrote:
That's a bit strange: On the one hand it fails the activate, having
accepted the add (which is what I expect from a non-enabled subsystem,
having read the manual). On the other hand usage seems to succeed anyway.
Is it possible you already
Thanks! I'd already read the book and noted that Dynamic SSI came after
BLSR. And so the BLSR book might not have been updated.
I am pretty sure that I submitted a request about 15 years ago
to update the next edition of the Batch LSR manual to say that
SETSSI can be used to active Batch LSR.
