"Wandschneider, Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Does anybody have a trick on how to LOGOFF disconnected users like
>DISKACNT instead of using FORCE. Sometimes FORCE will cause a user to
>hang and it requires the forcing user to have class A. I know that the
>FORCE command can be change to anot
With Windows Server standard edition, you would indeed pay for each Windows
guest that ran on Intel virtualization including VMware, Xen, Virtual Server,
or Hyper-V. If a customer licenses Windows Server Enterprise Edition (EE) to a
host server, that license will support from 1-4 guest Windows
> Is this really true??? One per *virtual*, not *real*,
> machine? If I were two run two
> copies of Windows on *one* PC, using e.g. VM-Ware,
> I would be required to pay twice???
Depends on what version of Windows. Some versions have restrictions on
where they can legally run, and there are limit
I think I remember hearing that's how it worked here for Windows and
RedHat Linux too. Not sure about SuSE Linux since we don't run that on
Intel.
My memory is getting full though and I don't page nearly as well as VM
so I could be mistaken!
Marcy Cortes
"This message may contain confidential
>Why would the Microsoft Licensing be "tricky"?
>Expensive perhaps as you need
>one license per virtual machine, but not tricky...
Is this really true??? One per *virtual*, not *real*,
machine? If I were two run two
copies of Windows on *one* PC, using e.g. VM-Ware,
I would be required to pay t
The Oracle or one of its agents has spoken. Thanks, John.
Would marking the disk as draining in the config file prevent the loss
of anything caused by the timing of the detection of the difference that
you describe?
Another question, would backing up only files that are at least
partially conta
>I've renamed spool volumes several times, four or more years ago, but a
>force start was required. I don't recall whether it was VM/ESA or z/VM.
>I would recommend a spool backup before attempting it. And if it is for
>a production system, then schedule enough time to reload spool, if
>necessary.
It might be easier to drain the volume, use SPFPACK to identify files
that are wholly or partially contained on it, and vacate it using a
combination of PURGE and SPXTAPE. If it is left drained and empty until
after the IPL that gets the new volser, it might not require the FORCE
start. The FORCE s
I've renamed spool volumes several times, four or more years ago, but a
force start was required. I don't recall whether it was VM/ESA or z/VM.
I would recommend a spool backup before attempting it. And if it is for
a production system, then schedule enough time to reload spool, if
necessary.
Yes, but an experiment using those areas does not necessarily translate
to renaming of a spool volume. It would seem reasonable that renaming
would be OK, but it doesn't hurt to hear it from the Oracle.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM
I don't believe that will cause any problems. I've done it recently with
the checkpoint and warm start areas (renamed the volume they are on) and
was able to come up without a problem and find all my spool files. As
long as the volumes remain in the same slots, you should be fine.
Bob Bates
En
From my experiments with GCC on VM/370 I would say that the 16megs of
address space (i.e. real i370) is not enough space to run a "modern" linux
in, so I would think XA/ESA type hardware would be needed
Dave G4UGM
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
- Original Message -
From: "Gentry, Step
Will it kill spool if I
1. Reliable a spool disk and
2. Chnge the entry in the cpowned list, replacing the old volser with
the new?
Regards,
Richard Schuh
On 3/26/08 5:05 PM, "Dave Wade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The existing licenses already allow running in a virtual environment and
> don't specify what chips etc that could be. They could change future
> licenses, perhaps, but MS licenses don't work like Mainframe Licenses and it
> would be har
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:51 PM, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Modern Linuxes don't run on p390-class machines anymore, I think.
> > > Halfword immediate instructions maybe?
> >
> > With a proper support contract you could get the microcode that
> > supports halfway immediate i
> > Modern Linuxes don't run on p390-class machines anymore, I think.
> > Halfword immediate instructions maybe?
>
> With a proper support contract you could get the microcode that
> supports halfway immediate instructions.
Didn't that require a p390e card or an IS, though? I don't think the MC
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Adam Thornton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Modern Linuxes don't run on p390-class machines anymore, I think.
> Halfword immediate instructions maybe?
With a proper support contract you could get the microcode that
supports halfway immediate instructions. Early
On Mar 27, 2008, at 8:33 AM, Gentry, Stephen wrote:
Hmm, what about the i370 aka Bigfoot? Other than physically, how did
the
p370 differ from the s/370?
To quote from a document/webpage attributed to you:
Linux on the System/390 is an idea that has been being kicked around
since Linux's earli
Thanks to all for your replies!
Alyce
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 5:25 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: MONWRITE files
A VMARC file should be FIXED
I have a program that sits around waiting for e-mails to arrive in its
reader queue, then strips out HTML attachments into separate files.
Would that be of interest?
Peter
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of A. Harry Williams
Sent:
Hmm, what about the i370 aka Bigfoot? Other than physically, how did the
p370 differ from the s/370?
To quote from a document/webpage attributed to you:
Linux on the System/390 is an idea that has been being kicked around
since Linux's earliest days, but not much was done until 1998 or so.
Linas V
> There are also Perl implementations of similar tools, which will run
> with Neale's port of Perl5 for OpenVM.
In fact, here's most of what you need, using the Perl MIME::Tools
package. You'll need to add the code that writes the individual parts
out to files, but the rest of it is a few lines of
ftp://ftp.andrew.cmu.edu/pub/mpack/
munpack is a fairly simple C program that does what you want (eats a
MIME-formatted input file with multiple MIME elements) and writes the
individual elements to files. You'll need to tweak the filename handling
(or use it in a BFS environment), but it should co
What about Victor Strasser's "OFSMIME" package. The README file includes:
--
OFSMime Package V2.1.1 2000-02-08
==
E-mail is not just text anymore. The Multipurpose Internet Mail
Extensions (mime) standard allows information in just about any digital
form
MAILIT with TEST option sends the result to your reader. That is, the
mail body and the attachments. If that format suits you, an extra
option would be easily added. Your phrasing seems to suggest you'd
like to get two files: the mail body and the attachments. That would
require a bit extra wor
A VMARC file should be FIXED 80, (but V 80 may work as well). To be axact:
PIPE < MONVIEW VMARC A | FBLOCK 80 00 | > NEWFILE VMARC A F 80
2008/3/27, Austin, Alyce (CIV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Berry and Mike,
>
> Your pipe commands appear to have worked. After issuing them this is
> what I
I'm looking for a utility that would take an email file and create the
files that are mime attachments on disk. There are several examples of the
reverse on the VM downloads page (MAILIT, etc) or there is the SENDFILE, but
there is nothing I can find that deals handling a file that has attachments
27 matches
Mail list logo
