The New Jersey is a Battleship not a Carrier. The carriers are bigger.
-Original Message-
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 8:41 PM
To: Matt Crawford
Cc: Vijay; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Carrier Class Gateway
At
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:44:25 CDT, Robert G. Ferrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
There's some discussion of Panama requirements in 'The New New Thing'.
Not just a lock, but there's a bridge to worry about; passing under it
at low tide is your height limit.
Ya know, if we wait long enough, I'll
what type of media do you propose to run ISBP over?
- Original Message -
From: Robert G. Ferrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: Carrier Class Gateway
And of *course*, you want the bridge and the ship
what type of media do you propose to run ISBP over?
Sailor-to-Sailor Relay, or maybe a specialized version of avian
carriers (RFC 1149 et al.) using albatrosses or seagulls.
RGF
Not just a lock, but there's a bridge to worry about; passing under it
at low tide is your height limit.
i would imagine the problem would be at high, not low, tide.
oops. mea culpa.
Not at all. On a trip between oceans, waiting less than 12 hours for
a favorable tide is probably
There's some discussion of Panama requirements in 'The New New
Thing'.
Not just a lock, but there's a bridge to worry about; passing under
it
at low tide is your height limit.
i would imagine the problem would be at high, not low, tide.
oops. mea culpa.
L.
Sorry to add yet
what type of media do you propose to run ISBP over?
Sailor-to-Sailor Relay
Relay? Sounds like a synchronous protocol, requiring heavy use of
real-time techniques such as semaphores --
http://www.anbg.gov.au/flags/semaphore.html
If it were truly carrier class it would have large
However, those of us who choose to use asynchronous protocols can
more easily make use of powerful, space saving message compression --
http://www.anbg.gov.au/flags/signal-meaning.html
If there is ever an IETF held at sea, I nominate the flag for
Y - I am carrying mails as a conference
Not on the bridge, the need to cross UNDER it...
M.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Manning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dawson, Peter D [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 2:25 P
Subject: Re: Carrier Class Gateway
semantically confused. why would
semantically confused. why would sailors be on the
bridge? (the one over the canal)
Or is this a case of ShipsIntheNight
%
% .dark fiber optics..based on Dense Wavelength
% Division Multiplexing.. layed 2 km below the surface
% of the sea... oh factor in high/low tide ...
%
%
However, those of us who choose to use asynchronous protocols can
more easily make use of powerful, space saving message compression --
http://www.anbg.gov.au/flags/signal-meaning.html
If there is ever an IETF held at sea, I nominate the flag for
Y - I am carrying mails as a conference
This would a collision avoidance protocol. For example, measure maximum
height of the carrier class unit, compare to minimum height of the
terrestrial routed physical path bridge. If the CCU exceeds the TRPPB, it
must back off and wait until the next measurement cycle or until the
measurement
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bill Manning writes:
semantically confused. why would sailors be on the
bridge? (the one over the canal)
Right -- they should be using routers, not bridges.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
Hmm, does this mean we need a BOF to determine if there is a need
for a ShipsInTheDay protocol or if the ShipsInTheNight protocol would be
adequate for the job (with a few extensions of course)? Are we sure that ATM
would be desirable in this instance? Personally, I think this sounds like
one would have to consider high tides during a full moon to get an accurate
measurement.
I am also sorry about this but...
I think all the calculation regarding height limit should be made based on
high tides; it is easier to know if a ship would be able to pass on high
tide or not, when
However, those of us who choose to use asynchronous protocols can
more easily make use of powerful, space saving message compression --
http://www.anbg.gov.au/flags/signal-meaning.html
If there is ever an IETF held at sea, I nominate the flag for
Y - I am carrying mails as a
Why Waste time with calculations, It's an American Ship! Swing the 16 guns
and blow the Bridge. Bush can call it routine and not apologize for it.
-Original Message-
From: Pat Holden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 5:13 PM
To: Jose Manuel Arronte Garcia;
What do you think? will it be able to replace the existing JPEG image
compression algorithm?
http://research.microsoft.com/signal/progressivewavelet.asp
Manuel Arronte.
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Arronte Garcia;Jose Manuel
FN:Jose Manuel Arronte Garcia
NICKNAME:Chepo, ChepoSpock
Oh, I don't know, the flag for G (I require a pilot) seems to
describe
us pretty well, also...
Are you trying to imply we're rudderless??!!!
No, no: Palm Pilots..
Maybe we could use 'A' (D(r)iver below, I am undergoing a speed trial) for
b@ke@ffs.
Generaly 'UDP Helper' its used to name the host that process a specific
broadcast UDP packet. The word become usual because you need to configure it
on some equipment to address specific task of 'broadcast forwarding'.
- Case study:
Imagine you have this scenario:
central-site Lan --- Router1
20 matches
Mail list logo
