From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Edward
Lewis
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:01 PM
To: ietf
Cc: Edward Lewis
Subject: Lessons from PROVREG WG was Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois...
[snip]
This is an example of an ICANN initiated piece of work that barely
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Joe Abley
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 1:06 PM
To: Tony Finch
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker; IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today
announced ithas
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Bernie Hoeneisen
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 12:54 PM
To: Alexey Melnikov
Cc: EPP Provreg; ietf@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name
-Original Message-
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@estacado.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:19 AM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott
Cc: General Area Review Team; Alexey Melnikov; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-hollenbeck-rfc4933bis-02
On Jul 14, 2009, at 6
-Original Message-
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@estacado.net]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 6:23 PM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott; General Area Review Team
Cc: Alexey Melnikov; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-hollenbeck-rfc4933bis-02
I have been selected
-Original Message-
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@estacado.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:28 PM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott; General Area Review Team
Cc: Alexey Melnikov; Chris Newman; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-hollenbeck-rfc4933bis-01
I have been
-Original Message-
From: The IESG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 8:33 PM
To: IETF-Announce
Subject: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail
Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter
to
-Original Message-
From: The IESG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 11:09 AM
To: IETF-Announce
Subject: Last Call: draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control (XML
Schema for Media Control) to Informational RFC
The IESG has received a request from an
-Original Message-
From: The IESG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 2:47 PM
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Enum] Last Call: draft-ietf-enum-validation-epp
(ENUM Validation Information Mapping for the Extensible
Provisioning Protocol) to
-Original Message-
From: The IESG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 11:02 AM
To: IETF-Announce
Subject: Last Call: draft-klensin-norm-ref (Handling
Normative References for Standards Track Documents) to BCP
The IESG has received a request from an
-Original Message-
From: Frank Ellermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 8:42 PM
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Extensible Provisioning Protocol
(EPP)' toDraftStandard (draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3730bis)
Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
RFC 3339
-Original Message-
From: Sam Hartman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 1:33 PM
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Extensible Provisioning Protocol
(EPP)' to DraftStandard (draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3730bis)
Hi. RFC 3967 is not applicable in cases
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 9:10 PM
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity
Exchange (DIX)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
While the members of
-Original Message-
From: Dave Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 9:14 PM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; Ted Hardie
Subject: Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX)
My immediate concern is that we know
better
-Original Message-
From: Dave Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 10:04 AM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX)
[snip]
In simplistic (but productive and non-sarcastic) terms, I
-Original Message-
From: Dave Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 7:47 PM
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: Ted Hardie; Hollenbeck, Scott
Subject: Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX)
[snip]
ps. I happen to the the general topic
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 10:23 AM
To: Marshall Eubanks
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: I have filed the petition (Re: Anyone not in favor
of a PR-Action against Jefsey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Lilly
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 8:59 AM
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: Margaret Wasserman
Subject: Re: New root cause problems?
On Tue May 24 2005 08:35, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
Hi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 4:34 PM
To: Dave Crocker
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; moore@cs.utk.edu; Dave Crocker; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Uneccesary slowness.
[snip]
Second, in the
In honor of our retiring chair and his talent with acronyms, the
working draft has been changed to use Directives for Oversight
and Administration. The editorial problems Bruce identified
have been fixed. :-)
There's an interesting acronym that can be derived from Directives for
Oversight
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 10:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; John C Klensin; Christian Huitema
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: draft-phillips-langtags-08,
(Sorry if this is a duplicate; I sent an earlier copy from an address that
isn't subscribed to the IETF list. Last I heard it was being held for
moderation.)
Last Call Comments: draft-ietf-simple-filter-format
I have asked the XML Directorate to review this document. These comments
are my own.
This BOF is yet to appear on the formal agenda for IETF-61. FYI in advance
of the agenda being made available.
-Scott-
--
BOF Chairs:
Howard Eland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patrik Fältström [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BOF Description:
IDN-over-EPP
As the global DNS applications and Top-Level Domain
Frank,
I'm still trying to understand the points you are trying to make. I'm not
sure if I've been successful, so I'll try instead to respond to specific
points in the hope that it all makes sense when taken as a whole.
Comments inline below.
-Scott-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Doug Royer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:14 PM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott
Cc: 'Dawson Frank (NMP/Irving)'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to
Proposed
-Original Message-
From: Doug Royer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 6:36 PM
The iCalendar date-time format is restricted to exactly one
representation of date-time (not optional spaces, dashes, ...).
There was a large debate on this before rfc2445 came
-Original Message-
From: Dawson Frank (NMP/Irving) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2001 12:39 PM
To: 'ext Hollenbeck, Scott'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to
Proposed Standard
-Original Message-
From: Dawson Frank (NMP/Irving) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2001 2:30 PM
To: 'ext Hollenbeck, Scott'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Last Call: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps to
Proposed Standard
Has anyone else noticed that all of the links to the various implementation
reports found here:
http://www.ietf.org/IESG/implementation.html
appear to be broken? In addition, what should be a mailto: link at the
bottom of the page is broken, too. It's encoded as this:
A
There will be a BOF session during the San Diego IETF meeting to ascertain
interest and (potentially) establish goals for a working group devoted to
developing standards track Internet domain name registration service
protocols. The BOF has been tentatively scheduled for Thursday 14 December
I just had a call from the DoubleTree Hotel in Pittsburgh -- they are
canceling a number of (70+) confirmed reservations for the next IETF meeting
due to overbooking. They're trying to arrange for alternative
accommodations, but if you had a confirmed reservation at the DoubleTree you
might want
31 matches
Mail list logo
