I'm looking for research / surveys on how enterprises and service providers
really use subnetting within their networks. In particular, I'm interested
in the size of subnets that people are regularly using and I'm interested
in both public and private addressed networks (which I'm assuming,
At 08:40 AM 25/07/01 -0600, Vernon Schryver wrote:
I've read somewhere that they sometimes ignore the 3 character DOS
filename or filetype extension and look for magic numbers in the data.
I've no way of evaluating that, or at least no inclination.
I know that both Explorer and Netscape do
Apologies for the delay in responding. I believe that Mark's summary is
pretty accurate but I would add one clarification. SOAP encompasses much
broader scope that iCAP. SOAP is a whole architecture for messaging; iCAP
is a very simplified vectoring protocol.
iCAP is a way of getting an
Let me give you an example of where this didn't work recently. At San
Diego, we had back-to-back meetings of WREC followed by OPES BoF and CDNP
BoF. For the most part, there was a very large overlap in the attendance.
If you did not forgoe the coffee break and - literally! - run between the
...and speaking of bad manners, I noticed that there is a resurgence of
people talking mobile-phone calls in meetings. I was only there for one day
but it happened twice in three meetings. Another annoyance is those who
allow it to ring and then cancel the call (presumably using CLI or
(i.e. DNS server farms,
firewalls, proxies). As I have said repeatedly, "interception proxies" is
only one of these applications and by no means the most widely used.
Are you confusing this with WCCP (which *only* works with "interception
proxies").
Quoth John Martin:
[...
At 10:49 AM 13/04/00 -0700, Eliot Lear wrote:
Part of the problem here is that a knife may be used as a food utensil or a
weapon. Safe handling, however, is always required, and should be
documented.
Granted.
I would add two other comments. I tried to locate the RFC for HTTP/0.9,
but the best
There has been a lot of discussion about the problems associated with
so-called "interception proxies". This discussion is very much within the
charter of the WREC WG. In fact, we even have a current draft whose sole
purpose is to document such problems.
The known problems draft is at:
At 10:39 AM 10/04/00 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
The I-D in question has been referred to an existing IETF WG for review,
that assertion was made, but not confirmed by the ADs.
is it really true? it seems odd because it really isn't in scope for wrec.
Let me jog your memory:
At 06:29 PM
