Can you elaborate on why the license makes a difference?
We have been told it would make it easier for people to make and distribute
translations.
--Paul Hoffman
Actually, verbatim translations are already allowed under the existing IETF
document license. It's other modifications
Please see below for some specific responses to Brian's concerns.
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Chris Griffiths cgriffi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Aug 1, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Brian E Carpenter
brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Brian,
Re the Trust's plenary slides (I was not in Berlin):
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Margaret Wasserman m...@lilacglade.orgwrote:
Hi Stewart,
On Mar 20, 2013, at 2:04 AM, Stewart Bryant stbry...@cisco.com wrote:
Age
Disability
Gender reassignment
Marriage and civil partnership
Pregnancy and maternity
Race
Religion and belief
years, and this is an important policy document that the community should
be aware of.
I look forward to the discussion!
Jorge Contreras
Sam,
Here are some responses for your consideration.
Jorge
On 10/11/12 3:32 PM, Sam Hartman hartmans-i...@mit.edu wrote:
Hi, Russ.
In question 2,
I don't understand what several terms are and whether they have any
relation to the standards process.
The one most confusing is agreements to
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Robin Uyeshiro uyesh...@ifa.hawaii.eduwrote:
I'd like to comment a bit on patent ownership/control/etc. Patents are
assigned by the (US) patent office, usually, these days, to the company
for whom the inventor works.
No, the patent is assigned by the
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Robin Uyeshiro uyesh...@ifa.hawaii.eduwrote:
**
Ownership is not a term used. Control can
be problematic, if the inventor changes employment. If you invent
something
for which a patent is issued and assigned to your company, then you change
employment,
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 21, 2012, at 7:01 PM, Stephan Wenger st...@stewe.org wrote:
Hi Russ, policy-folks,
I support the simplification of the Note Well.
Two concerns, one substantial and one nit, with respect to the language
proposed.
The use of the work know in the context of
You should refer to the Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents found
here:
http://trustee.ietf.org/docs/IETF-Trust-License-Policy.pdf
In particular, Sec. 3 relates to use of text from IETF documents and
crediting, though other sections may also be relevant to what you are doing.
Jorge
On
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:35 PM, GTW g...@gtwassociates.com wrote:
**
Ted, I like your approach of enquiring what problem we are striving to
solve and I like Russ's concise answer that it is Recent suits against
other SDOs that is the source of the concern
Russ, what are some of the
As far as I understand the trust agreement the voting members and the IAD
are members of the trust. If the 'chairs' are non-voting members of the IAOC
then the idea is that they would not be trustees and a modification of the
trust agreement is not needed. That can be clarified.
If the
Barry,
You may want to refer to Section 5.2 of RFC 5378, which addresses this
issue:
Each Contributor agrees that any statement in a Contribution, whether
generated automatically or otherwise, that states or implies that the
Contribution is confidential or subject to any privilege, can be
Julian -- your understanding is consistent with mine. That seems to be the
right legend.
Regards,
Jorge
--
- *From*: Julian Reschke julian.reschke at
gmx.dejulian.resc...@domain.hidden
- *To*: IETF Discussion ietf at ietf.org i...@domain.hidden
- *Cc*: Paul
13 matches
Mail list logo
