FYI - we talked about the name of the group in the IESG meeting last night.
After a review of the thread, the IESG concluded that there is no consensus to
change the name of the LISP working group. But judging from the interest in the
rest of the discussion, I'm standing by and awaiting for
- Original Message -
From: Templin, Fred L fred.l.temp...@boeing.com
To: Noel Chiappa j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 3:54 PM
-Original Message-
From: Noel Chiappa [mailto:j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu]
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011
- Original Message -
From: Robin Whittle r...@firstpr.com.au
To: IETF Discussion Mailing List ietf@ietf.org
Cc: Ran Atkinson rja.li...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 5:42 AM
Short version: Ran objects to some things I wrote about his ILNP
protocol - which
From: Michel Py [mic...@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us]
There is a good potential of conflict in the appreciation of the
negotiate in good faith thing, as the carrier with a majority of SIP
clients would not want to invest in the TDM hardware to connect, while
the carrier with a majority of
Hi, all,
I've reviewed this document as part of the transport area directorate's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the
document's authors for their information and to allow them to address
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, The IESG wrote:
Hi,
The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 Operations WG (v6ops) to
consider the following document:
- 'Happy Eyeballs: Success with Dual-Stack Hosts'
draft-ietf-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-05.txt as a Proposed Standard
Having been on a lot of different
Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
it appears that their intention is to require IP-to-IP
interconnection. The carrier with a majority of TDM clients
will probably have to provide IP interconnection.
Being an outsider, I wonder how big the stick is. But nevertheless I
would say well played, as it
The IESG has received a request from the Transparent Interconnection of
Lots of Links WG (trill) to consider the following document:
- 'Definitions of Managed Objects for RBridges'
draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-mib-04.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6388
Title: Label Distribution Protocol Extensions for
Point-to-Multipoint and Multipoint-to-Multipoint
Label Switched Paths
Author: IJ.
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6404
Title: Session PEERing for Multimedia INTerconnect
(SPEERMINT) Security Threats and Suggested
Countermeasures
Author: J. Seedorf, S.
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6405
Title: Voice over IP (VoIP) SIP
Peering Use Cases
Author: A. Uzelac, Ed.,
Y. Lee, Ed.
Status: Informational
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6406
Title: Session PEERing for Multimedia INTerconnect
(SPEERMINT) Architecture
Author: D. Malas, Ed.,
J. Livingood, Ed.
Status:
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6424
Title: Mechanism for Performing Label Switched
Path Ping (LSP Ping) over MPLS
Tunnels
Author: N. Bahadur, K. Kompella,
13 matches
Mail list logo
