Thank you Ben for reviewing and taking the time to go through the
document once more!
Agreed; Sorry, I missed that one.
I will make sure it is included in the next revision. I am sure you are
okay not to spin another revision unless this is the only outstanding
comment.
Thanks again!
Regards,
retransmissions causing concern?
On Sep 16, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Ahmad Muhanna wrote:
Hello Ben,
Thinking about this a little more, I think that you also
would accept
if we remove the text causing grief all together:) In
other words,
what about if we reword the text as below
for the
retransmission issue.
Otherwise, I agree this closes the open issues.
Thanks!
Ben.
On Sep 12, 2009, at 3:23 AM, Ahmad Muhanna wrote:
Hi Ben,
Hopefully we can close on all of the open issues.
Please see inline.
Regards,
Ahmad
-Original Message-
From: Ben
no matching binding undefined. I think that makes
implementors even more likely to decide not to send a BRA in
that case.
Is the warning about retransmissions causing concern?
On Sep 16, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Ahmad Muhanna wrote:
Hello Ben,
Thinking about this a little more, I think that you
issue.
Otherwise, I agree this closes the open issues.
Thanks!
Ben.
On Sep 12, 2009, at 3:23 AM, Ahmad Muhanna wrote:
Hi Ben,
Hopefully we can close on all of the open issues.
Please see inline.
Regards,
Ahmad
-Original Message-
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b
Hi Ben,
Hopefully we can close on all of the open issues.
Please see inline.
Regards,
Ahmad
-Original Message-
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@estacado.net]
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of
draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10
This is a followup on revision
that does not need clarification or
anything like that.
Thanks again Ben for your review and comments!
Thanks!
Ben.
On Sep 5, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Ahmad Muhanna wrote:
Hello,
We have updated the draft to address all comments.
A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http
Hello,
We have updated the draft to address all comments.
A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-1
1.txt
In summary, here is a list of the major changes:
1. Enhanced to the security text mainly under section 6.1. and section
13
-- S7.2, paragraph 2: Since some mobility entities, e.g., local
mobility anchor and mobile access gateway, are allowed
to receive
and possibly send a Binding Revocation Indication or Binding
Revocation Acknowledgement for different cases,
therefore, if IPsec
is used to secure
it is only required at a
SHOULD strength. I think the answer to the similar point below helps.
[Ahmad]
Ok.
More inline:
On Aug 27, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Ahmad Muhanna wrote:
Hi, Ben,
-Original Message-
Summary: This draft is on the right track, but there are
open
Hi Ben,
Please see inline.
Regards,
Ahmad
-Original Message-
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@estacado.net]
Subject: Re: [PART-I] Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of
draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10
On Sep 1, 2009, at 3:35 PM, Ahmad Muhanna wrote:
[...]
So is it true
Hi, Ben,
Sorry for the late reply, hope to close on all comments; please see
inline.
-Original Message-
[...]
[PART-II]
Nits/editorial comments:
-- General:
I understand that, and I hope I didn't come off too critical.
I know that it is very hard to make a draft that
:
On Aug 27, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Ahmad Muhanna wrote:
Hi, Ben,
-Original Message-
Summary: This draft is on the right track, but there are
open issues.
Additionally, I have a number of editorial comments.
Major issues:
-- I think the security considerations need
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the detailed review and comments.
Please allow me to address your comments in two parts.
1. PART-I: Major and technical issues.
2. PART-II: remaining comments.
Please see answers inline for PART-I.
Regards,
Ahmad
-Original Message-
Summary: This draft is on the
Hi Ben,
Please see answers in line for PART-II.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@estacado.net]
Subject: Gen-ART LC and Telechat Review of
draft-ietf-mext-binding-revocation-10
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft
Hi, Ben,
-Original Message-
Summary: This draft is on the right track, but there are
open issues.
Additionally, I have a number of editorial comments.
Major issues:
-- I think the security considerations need quite a bit of
work. In
particular, there is very
Hi,
If anyone have an extra social event ticket, please respond to me
directly.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Ahmad
___
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
17 matches
Mail list logo
