Hello.
I would like to express my concern about retiring the xx99 RFCs. I
think they still fill a need, especially over longer periods of time,
and should not be discontinued.
It was stated that they are no longer needed because up to date
information is available online, and the RFC search
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Hadriel Kaplan hkap...@acmepacket.com wrote:
Fascinating. I had no idea that there even *was* such a phrase in common
usage, let alone that there was known etymology for it. One learns something
new every day.
But I meant it quite literally: a
of an intrusive 3rd party, while
mere users and upstarts can only call connect().
Some people consider that a feature. I do not.
It is, in fact, getting really hard to avoid assuming malice on the
part of people who want to nail the world to the nat44 cross.
.. Mark Atwood
This post would be much less confusing if you would name names, cite
examples, and point fingers.
The reason why so many documents are at proposed is that they're
often collections of bloat (limited-use features with an aggresive
requirements level) from various interest groups that is
not
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Dean Willis dean.wil...@softarmor.comwrote:
On Apr 8, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Stephan Wenger wrote:
Hi Fred,
Would you really expect me not to throw my weight (assuming there were
one) behind the proposal I fought teeth and claws before—and damage my
Much of what makes the IETF work is how it is very different from other
standards bodies (such as IEEE, ANSI, ISO, NIST, ITU, etc etc).
One key difference is that groups do not join the IETF.
Cisco, IBM, MCI, or Linden Lab are not a members of the IETF. No agency
of the US government, or of any
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Lars Eggert lars.egg...@nokia.com wrote:
On 2010-3-27, at 13:41, Ray Pelletier wrote:
We have been working with an online vendor to allow t-shirts and other
paraphernalia (coffee mugs, ball caps, etc)
to be purchased. The rock concert design has been a
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Greg Daley gda...@netstarlogicalis.comwrote:
I would actually not encourage IETF to work on such a technology as this,
particularly in the lead-up to IETF Beijing. That would be a serious
affront
to our hosts.
By as this, you are referring to both
.epub has a number of serious faults of its own, that are starting to be
experienced as people are playing with it in wake of the iPad stuff. It's
basically a dead end repackaging of an old HTML spec, and it has nobody
working on getting it up to date, or working on it at all.
On Thu, Mar 11,
vinton g. cerf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 01:01 PM 12/9/2003 +1200, Franck Martin wrote:
What is wrong with ISOC?
at the moment it is not well constituted to develop policy.
This is a feature, not a bug.
--
Mark Atwood | When you do things right,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | people won't be sure
can
build from scratch an ISP in that environment, it is very different
and very challanging compared to yet-another-huge-dialup ISP.
The Cisco guy should not get any cred jsut because of the corporation
name on his business card.
--
Mark Atwood | I'm wearing black only until I find something
ISTR reading an RFC or ID awhile back about using multicast to
distribute files to many hosts from a central server via
multicast. But I'm having no luck today with the search engines, and
can't find it again.
Can anyone post a pointer?
--
Mark Atwood | I'm wearing black only until I find
nteed to give ulcers and headaches
to every firewall admin on the `net.
Netmeeting? *spit* I used it for a year to "video telecommute".
--
Mark Atwood | Freedom from want, freedom from fear, freedom from choice.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Is that the freedom you want?
http://www.pobox.com/~mra
to get heavy. Too many sales and PHB presentations,
probably.)
--
Mark Atwood | Freedom from want, freedom from fear, freedom from choice.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Is that the freedom you want?
http://www.pobox.com/~mra
quot; is unnecessary.
--
Mark Atwood | It is the hardest thing for intellectuals to understand, that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | just because they haven't thought of something, somebody else
| might. http://www.friesian.com/rifkin.htm
http://www.pobox.com/~mra
n the SMTP banner.
Rescap Profile for Mail User Agents
draft-hoffman-rescap-mua-02.txt
November 20, 1999
--
Mark Atwood | It is the hardest thing for intellectuals to understand, that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | just because they haven't thought of something, somebody else
| m
nd show up at the meetings.
--
Mark Atwood | It is the hardest thing for intellectuals to understand, that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | just because they haven't thought of something, somebody else
| might. http://www.friesian.com/rifkin.htm
http://www.pobox.com/~mra
e agent you are talking to, he has peers and
superiours who are clueless and looking for "points".
The ONLY ONLY ONLY thing you ever say to a LEO is "no" and "speak to
my lawyer".
--
Mark Atwood |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
http://www.pobox.com/~mra |
John Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Correct. Lets get an application name space so we don't need to worry
about it.
Please gods below, not more ASN.1
--
Mark Atwood |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
http://www.pobox.com/~mra |
19 matches
Mail list logo
