net/
it is however a factor :)
regards
joe baptista
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
never official. usually someone discovers a problem and
sometimes a root operator responds. Usually in NANOG.
cheers
joe baptista
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
t;standing."
I suggest you check isp's in the asia pacific region. Standard practice
in some cases to intercept all dns including root traffic. So i'm sure F
is one of them.
regards
joe baptista
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
bring it to ICANN/IANA.
New rules of proceedure covering disclosure. The Public-Root has done
more in it's troubles to polarize opinion, and that is a good thing.
cheers
joe
Joe Baptista, Official Public-Root Representative and Lobbyist to the
United States Congress and Senate / Tel: +1 (202) 517-15
wrong site - try www.inaic.com and www.public-root.com. Turkey is our
best customer.
cheers
joe
Joe Baptista, Official Public-Root Representative and Lobbyist to the
United States Congress and Senate / Tel: +1 (202) 517-1593
Public-Root Disclosure Documents: http://www.cynikal.net/~baptista/P
toy and games, software (i.e. 3ivx video compression) and
> electronics. Currently Mr. Laureyssens is Master in Social and Political
> Sciences, and is an independent Intellectual Property consultant.
> "In addition Dirk Laureyssens is inventor and he holds a wide range of
> patents.&
Cheers
joe baptista
>
> On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 15:58 -0400, Joe Baptista wrote:
> > Yes - both patents attempt to take control of the adding of tlds to a root
> > zone file. The second patent recorded on 6 July 2005 is an attempt to
> > further recognize the proceedure a
/BASIS/BREV/web/brevwebdut11/DDW?W%3DTI+PH+IS+%27TECHNOLOGIE+EN+BUSINESSMODEL+INZAKE%27%26M%3D1%26K%3D005/0340%26R%3DY%26U%3D1
does not look like that one was rejected. any advise Jeroen?
thanks
joe baptista
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Joe Baptista wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Jero
>
> Do you mean as in RFC 3675?
>>>
>>
I sometimes wonder how this RFC ever got off the ground. Its a bit of a
joke.
regards
joe baptista
--
Joe Baptista
www.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
The future of
t; the
> rules is, of course, far more important than producing quality
> documents...)
Yes - we are only human. Rules are good. That does not mean rules can not
be questioned. And changes made by consensus.
cheers
joe baptista
--
Joe Baptista
www.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
-
This all smells bad.
regards
joe baptista
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:48 AM, linuxa linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Doug, Thanks for your response that shows your knowledge and expertise
> about internet / computer things, common sense, organisational topics and
> also the r
This is a very anal retentive discussion your all having here. I support
Ford here. Applications should be able to use names and IP addresses. We
don't need the IP or DNS gestapo taking over application programs.
regards
joe baptista
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Bryan Ford wrote:
I'm adding my name to this chorus. Do not approve TLS. Just say no.
regards
joe baptista
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Phil Driscoll wrote:
> I am managing director of a software company working almost exclusively in
> the
> development and deployment of internet techno
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
Dear Brian,
ICANN ICP-3 document called for a DNS test-bed to carry experiments in
a given framework (to test various DNS evolutions including the end of
the root). The document lists interesting criteria/conditions. Some
are related to the DNS (non profit, ultimate
Peter Dambier wrote:
Still they have nameservers and they happily communicate with
each other without ICANN even nowing about their existence.
Out of touch with reality.
regards
joe
Cheers
Peter and Karin
At 16:06 15/02/2006, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
When considering some recent app
Mohsen BANAN wrote:
More than 5 years ago I predicted what the Chinese
government announced today.
This action by the chinese was done three years ago. This is not a new
event.
regards
joe
What happened today:
http://english.people.com.cn/200602/28/eng20060228_246712.html
http://www.in
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
...
Ignore China?
No, that would be foolish.
It is foolish.
We automatically ignore any pseudo-TLD that only exists within
a walled garden, because it is simply invisible outside.
It isn't part of the global Internet. If it appears in any
way outside the walled
f law on the internet. You don't co-operate -
you don't communicate. Its the users need to communicate which is the
driving force behind the internet and those root that will remain relevant.
cheers
joe baptista
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf
h with the world - do they?
cheers
joe baptista
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
experience.
Give my luv to Paul
Joe Baptista
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
There is nothing to do for the IETF or the "Internet technical
community" (whatever it is). The problem is 100 % political and should
be addressed in ICANN / WSIS / IGF / whatever but not in the IETF.
Good Lord - your spewing the crapola far and wide today. Like I
my detailed notes below ...
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
> At 18:27 08/03/2006, Carl Malamud wrote:
>
> > > It's been pointed out that the note to DoC was actually sent by
> > > the IAB and the IETF *Chair* not the IETF as whole.
> > >
> > > Obviously, the timescale of this RFI
Turkish secret service operative discovered in Public-Root.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Joe Baptista wrote:
>
> Turkish secret service operative discovered in Public-Root.
http://www.netkwesties.nl/editie140/artikel1.html
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
;
> > Please, read twice before clicking "send" and refrain from further abusive
> > posting. Otherwise you will be forcing us to take a serious decision
> > regarding your future postings.
> >
> > Thanks for your understanding.
> >
> > IETF Sergea
Oops - I forgot about that one. Yes the Chinese Ministry of Information
and Industry have many chinese top level domains registered. The are
now the largest alternative root system on the planet next to icann and
resolve for some 150 million users. And i anticipate they will soon
surpass tha
doing design
and planning.
Thing have changed.
regards
joe baptista
--
Joe Baptistawww.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive,
Representative
I don't think the full poitential of the datagram network has yet been
realized. User control anyone?
regards
joe baptista
--
Joe Baptistawww.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
The futur
what groups i can go to to find people located in those
service areas.
much thanks
joe baptista
--
Joe Baptistawww.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
The future of the Internet is Open, Transp
- www.unifiedroot.com
regards
joe baptista
--
Joe Baptistawww.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive,
Representative & Accountable to the Inte
Roy Arends wrote:
On Jul 19, 2007, at 4:10 PM, Joe Baptista wrote:
Now this is an interesting little giggle. I made it into a DNS
timeline. Incredible.
http://www.inaic.com/index.php?p=internet-dns-timeline
Incidentaly and by way of reference, these are the people who once
operated
I'd like to talk to Bell. Designer of the Assassination Politics
protocol. Anyone know if he's out of jail yet?
thanks
joe baptista
--
Joe Baptistawww.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI!
I'm 81duz1d0, programmer.
Today I’ve joined to IETF Mail List, I hope that my texts be useful to
this community.
tell us more.
and welcome
regards
joe baptista
--
Joe Baptistawww.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Conso
cheers
joe baptista
You don't have permission to access /rfc/rfc4390.txt on this server.
Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an
ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Apache/2.0.52 (Red Hat) Server at www.ietf.
doing and going was communications ... and somehow the
very thing all these doers and goers were trying to promote,
communications, was the very thing being buried by all this doing and going.
regards
joe baptista
--
Joe Baptistawww.publicroot.org
P
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Notice that you don't get the lower prices and cartel breaking by increasing
> the number of domains, you get it by increasing the number of registrars.
I disagree. The current arrangement of increasing registrars looks alot
like a multi level marke
ves the special
interest on this list that such debate be limited or altogether
eliminated.
cheers
joe baptista
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> proposal of mailfrom dns record - http://www.vix.com/~vixie/mailfrom.txt or
I've had a look at vixies proposal and it's a good one. I certainly would
welcome something like the mailfrom dns record.
regards
joe baptista
is vint cerf on the list?
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Richard Shockey wrote:
>
> ---
> 5) Power Bracket Game: Who's the most powerful person in
> networking?
> ---
> Decide in our2
re fools to be had. If he is for
real - well the press already considers him an expert in the field so
there's no contest there.
cheers
joe baptista
I understand swamp space is 192/8 thru 205/8. Am I correct. Also can
anyone provide me with a history of how these allocation got that name
??? swamp space ???
Thanks in advance.
Cheers
Joe Baptista
--
Planet Communications & Computing Facility
a division of The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
endless streams of devoted affection
to him. he informed. involved. i've always considered him an evolved
intellectual life form - probably our first self made electronic citizen.
he certainly commands their attentions.
Cheers
Joe Baptista
--
Planet Communications & Computing Facility
ying; why are you condoning dishonest behavior?
maybe it's because the bind company is a vixie thingy. and we all know a
good portion of the i$ociety owe saint vixie.
regards
joe baptista
osing the idea.
> >
> > We dispute ideas by using reasoned argument, rather than through
> > intimidation or ad hominem attack. Or, said in a somewhat more
> > IETF-like way:
yes - thats one thing thats nice about the ietf. at least when it works.
love and kisse
why don't you have an irc meeting so we can all publically give our
comments on this.
regards
joe baptista
Joe Baptista - only at www.baptista.god
Free Tibet http://free.tibet/
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in December, I published an interne
.IETF already exists - try not to duplicate namespace.
Joe Baptista - only at www.baptista.god
PoserTutor - How to use Poser http://posertutor.nomad/
registration facilities in the inclusive namespace
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Peter Deutsch wrote:
> g'day Randy,
>
> Ra
fyi
Joe Baptista - only at www.baptista.god
John de Laet
a personal and
professional website
http://www.paw.low/
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:04:21 -0800
From: Lawrence E. Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
ly if your getting this message in
a newsgroup so i don't inadvertently miss it.
cheers
joe baptista
Joe Baptista - only at www.baptista.god
"Those are mercenaries. Most probably they will be treated as
mercenaries, hirelings and as war criminals. ... For sure,
international law does not
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 11:43:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Robert Ross
Subject: ultra wide band - still experimental
from what i have seen any commerical application is mainly experimental -
still. I checked the ietf www.ietf.org for transmission or protocol
st
return address space if they don't pay their fees."
Can anyone tell me why this is the case?
regards
joe baptista
--
Planet Communications & Computing Facility
a division of The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
er addresses - non
public "Address Allocation for Private Internets". Unless I'm missing
something it's the public address network.
Cheers
Joe Baptista
--
Planet Communications & Computing Facility
a division of The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED
The subject line says it all - IPv6 is a great protocol for free speech
and other sorted activities.
-- Forwarded message --
http://www.circleid.com/articles/2543.asp
IPv6: In Search Of Internet Security
October 9, 2002 By Joe Baptista
My recent articles on IPv6
and
> key management, which has often proved to be an impediment, largely
> because of poor management designs/interfaces.
Yes and that is always a problem. User interfaces are not terribly
friendly.
> I could go on to identify many more errors in the statements you made
> re various security matters. As the military would say, you message
> is a "target rich environment." But, I think this ones noted above
> suggest that you don't really understand the nature of security in
> the Internet.
go ahead - consider it a learning challenge. and feel free to do so
privately.
cheers
joe baptista
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 12:32:23 EDT, Joe Baptista said:
>
> > You mentioned two security protocols above - well they have proven to be
> > vulnerable.
> >
> >
>http://search.cert.org/query.html?col=allcert&col=
arlier message someone mentioned the title
"security expert". I think considering what we know of security on the
internet that the term "security expert" is an oxymoron. Security experts
are essentially crisis managers. And every firm should have one.
regards
joe baptista
ervers were affected more than others, why? Was it that
> there was more ddos traffic directed at them, or that they had less hardware
> and network resources?
They didn't have St. Paul of Vixie and his vixens to save the day.
regards
joe baptista
inventory time - will those chips be ipv6 enabled?
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:25:11 -0400
From: Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FC: FDA permits use of implantable ID chips in humans
[There are two obvious questions: Shoul
That's a very good question.
Cheers
Joe Baptista
--
Planet Communications & Computing Facility
a division of The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Daniel Pelstring wrote:
> Since NSI has gone rogue and, many would argue that ICANN has too, I wish he
> was around
Does anyone know of such a list?
Cheers
Joe Baptista
--
Planet Communications & Computing Facility
a division of The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Daniel Pelstring wrote:
> Since NSI has gone rogue and, many would argue that ICANN has too, I wish he
> was around to r
what problems is it causing?
Cheers
Joe Baptista
--
Planet Communications & Computing Facility
a division of The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
> it seems that there's Windows XP laptop acting as rogue router
> ser
t The Media Did Not Tell You
November 20, 2002 | By Joe Baptista
On Monday, October 21, a "distributed denial of service" (DDOS) attack
struck 9 out of the 13 root servers operated by a number of contractors on
behalf of the United States Department of Commerce (USG). The next day,
the
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Rick Wesson wrote:
> see http://www.icann.org/committees/security/ for a list of the documents
> the group has produced and presented to date.
there's not much there. it's lacking any response to the ddos incident.
regards
joe baptista
by market share. the
other alt.roots are peanuts in comparison. Now mind you new.net has
purchased the right to be the navigator of record for those 156 million
users. Unlike the USG root system which does not buy the publics
affections.
regards
joe baptista
>
> Vint
>
> At 09
ecommend that ISPs take steps to prevent packets with forged IP addresses
from being used in DDOS attacks."
But I've seen nothing so far.
regards
joe baptista
>
> At 09:10 AM 11/23/2002 -0500, Joe Baptista wrote:
> >The attack, however, should come as no surprise to ICANN
endence on a US centric
root system.
I feel the single root approach that stuart lynn advcated and established
as icann policy is a bit lame for todays high speed web servers.
Of course I always appreciate your views on this.
regards
joe baptista
>
> At 09:10 AM 11/23/2002 -0500, Joe Baptis
ena.
But I would not discount new.net's claims. I'm sure they can support
their claims. At the very least they do have market share in root server
operations irrespective of the means used to calculate it.
I've cc'ed new.net on this - let's see if they respond.
regards
joe baptista
ure is used today. the
alternative roots have spam free domains on the internet.
but then how many spammers use ficticious domain names in the USG
internet. Alot!
And I take exception to you claiming these roots are ficticious. They are
the future of root service.
regards
joe baptista
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 10:56:51 EST, Joe Baptista said:
> > No - and I can confirm that non exists or at least i have not seen any in
> > the public arena.
>
> So there's *NO* public data to back it up that you know of.. Th
rd compatibility. It's as simple as that. Now if the ietf is will
to resolve .god on their mailservers I would be pleased to start posting
with [EMAIL PROTECTED] We could call it a test of some sort. Should
we vote on that. I'm all for it.
regards
joe baptista
of feeding the trolls.)
well if i'm a troll then you've been a tasty nibble.
but paul - let's try to get along here. the ietf list is one of the few
lists i'm on which is civilized. let's try to work towards that together.
kindest regards
joe baptista
p. very little sillyness goes on here. i
personally am no longer responding to the thread - unless of course some
other net god cares to make libelous statements. i am no dns pirate - i
consider myself and am a dns pioneer.
cheers
joe baptista
ody.htm#B175
Gordon Cook I understand can attest to this. He trolls here from time to
time. He overheard Postels end of the conversation. This of course is
well know internet history.
Gordon Cook also has reported on it - see his home page -
www.cookreport.com.
regards
joe baptista
should
not surprise us.
But to end this on a positive note - let me make clear I admire your work.
regards
joe baptista
On 26 Nov 2002, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
> I've sent twelve messages to the namedroppers mailing list this month.
> Five of them have been silently discarded by the na
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Dave Crocker wrote:
> if new.net were so sure of the efficacy of their approach, why do they
> (redundantly) use new.net in the ICANN/IANA root?
they want to be backwards compatible with the old legacy internet.
caches wouldn't
> be very effective with large numbers of TLDs.
That's old fiction. If it works for .com it will work for ".".
I don't see much in the way of difficulties here.
regards
joe baptista
e under attack and the "." file was as large as the .com zone - then i
would imgine there would be a significant problem. These same
vulnerability issues exist for the .com zone everyday. It's a very
vulnerable namespace to attack.
Thats about the only significant problem i see to a "." file being as
large as .com.
regards
joe baptista
mpsky-dnscurve-01.
regards
joe baptista
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> Who are these 'security researchers' of whom you speak? I am a
> principal in the security field, if you want to contradict me then you
> should either say that something is your
no grace nor tact - which
we would expect from a French man.
try to be more helpful when people ask questions. don't use harsh words like
"stupid" or else you'll scare people away. thats not what we want at the
IETF. nes pas?
regards
joe baptista
_
I think Dean does a good job of keeping the IETF honest.
cheers
joe baptista
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:28 AM, todd glassey wrote:
> Folks - I have had it with Dean and his actions in spamming me after
> being thrown off of IETF lists.
>
> Mr. Anderson has created a set of IETF
___
> > Ietf mailing list
> > Ietf@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> >
>
>
> ___
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
>
--
Joe Bapt
lso remember over the years that many voices warned this was
coming. I heard them. Did anyone else?
cheers
joe baptista
>
>
> Just my two cents
>
> Todd Glassey
>
>>
>> The recent threads about draft-housley-tls-authz have taught me something
>> I didn't kn
In any case the new infrastructure campaign demands U.S. government roots be
set up to exclusively serve U.S. network infrastructure.
regards
joe baptista
p.s. If you want to secure the DNS end to end - think DNSCurve - not DNSSEC.
http://dnscurve.org/
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 7:27
DNSSEC.
regards
joe baptista
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <874c02a20905311802r2b9b4544j374bb374eb7a7...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Joe Baptista writes:
> > DNSSEC indeed violates the end to end principle. It's simply that
> simple.
> &
When you guys start comparing DNSSEC to DNSCurve - we'll - all I can say is
this - I have this really nice bridge on the Hudson I'd like to sell you
that will compliment the bridge you've already have.
cheers
joe baptista
--
Joe Baptista
www.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
---
s. DNSSEC does not.
DNSCurve very quickly recognizes and discards forged packets, so attackers
have much more trouble preventing DNS data from getting through. DNSSEC does
not.
so I ask you - who wins the cookie in this race?
regards
joe baptista
--
Joe Baptista
www.public
so much simpler to solve DNS vulnerabilities with dnsCurve
http://bit.ly/cjmH2n
:)
2010/2/17 Phillip Hallam-Baker
> One mechanism that was unfortunately pushed asside as a result of the
> fixation on end to end DNSSEC would be to for the resolver to use
> DNSSEC (and other methods) to authentic
rks?
That would certainly be an innovative move forward for the ietf.
cheers
joe baptista
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Todd Glassey wrote:
> The real answer Tony is coming out of left field and it is the legal
> claims being asserted against people intentionally fielding code they know
ine you want to speak too.
At least members do something. Because the DNSSEC joke must end. We need
solutions to address the problem that don't end up being a make work
project.
cheers
joe baptista
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Masataka Ohta <
mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wro
FYI
http://twitter.com/joebaptista/status/9555178362
regards
joe baptista
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> other motivation to make things more difficult for the reader.
>
>
Thats a good assumption. But like most assumptions it is easily invalidated.
Remember a twitter messages contains links not supported in email i.e. the
hash #.
regards
joe baptista
p.s. of course if you want to follow yo
- which
will explode under DNSSEC but also the economic costs to business and
individuals of migrating hundreds of millions of domains in the DNSSEC make
work project. Let's not forget DNSSEC re-engineers the Internet to a
centralized control model that defeats the end to end bas
91 matches
Mail list logo
