Re: [ilugd] Distributed updates in Ubuntu

2010-07-26 Thread Sagar Belure
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Sagar Belure sagar.bel...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Ashish SHUKLA wahjava...@gmail.comwrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Vivek Kapoor writes: On 07/23/2010 06:32 PM, Sagar Belure sagar.bel...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [ilugd] Distributed updates in Ubuntu

2010-07-26 Thread Vivek Kapoor
On 07/26/2010 01:47 PM, Sagar Belure sagar.bel...@gmail.com wrote: 'apt-cacher-ng' seems to fulfill my requirements. BTW, is it ,by any chance, possible to set up 'repository-cache' server combined for 32 as well as 64 bit systems. apt-cacher* is for repository-cache of both 32bit and 64bit

Re: [ilugd] Distributed updates in Ubuntu

2010-07-26 Thread Sagar Belure
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Vivek Kapoor subs...@exain.com wrote: On 07/26/2010 01:47 PM, Sagar Belure sagar.bel...@gmail.com wrote: 'apt-cacher-ng' seems to fulfill my requirements. BTW, is it ,by any chance, possible to set up 'repository-cache' server combined for 32 as well as 64

Re: [ilugd] Distributed updates in Ubuntu

2010-07-26 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Sagar Belure writes: On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Sagar Belure sagar.bel...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Ashish SHUKLA wahjava...@gmail.comwrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Vivek Kapoor writes:

Re: [ilugd] Distributed updates in Ubuntu

2010-07-26 Thread Vivek Kapoor
On 07/26/2010 02:28 PM, Sagar Belure sagar.bel...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, apt-cacher* is just cache server. But, I have to install it *individually* on two different systems for 32 and 64 bit systems. Not sure what you mean by install it individually. You just install apt-cacher-ng `apt-get

Re: [ilugd] Distributed updates in Ubuntu

2010-07-26 Thread Sagar Belure
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Ashish SHUKLA wahjava...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Sagar Belure writes: On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Sagar Belure sagar.bel...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Ashish SHUKLA

Re: [ilugd] Distributed updates in Ubuntu

2010-07-26 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Sagar Belure writes: On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Ashish SHUKLA wahjava...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Sagar Belure writes: On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Sagar Belure sagar.bel...@gmail.com

Re: [ilugd] Distributed updates in Ubuntu

2010-07-26 Thread Sagar Belure
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Ashish SHUKLA wahjava...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Sagar Belure writes: On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Ashish SHUKLA wahjava...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Sagar Belure

Re: [ilugd] Distributed updates in Ubuntu

2010-07-26 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Sagar Belure writes: [...] And yes, Vivek seems right, that apt-cacher-ng uses cache located at /var/cache/apt-cacher-ng/_import. Now, I'm hoping importing already downloaded packages from /var/cache/apt/will be all fine. With apt-cacher you

Re: [ilugd] Distributed updates in Ubuntu

2010-07-25 Thread Sagar Belure
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Ashish SHUKLA wahjava...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Vivek Kapoor writes: On 07/23/2010 06:32 PM, Sagar Belure sagar.bel...@gmail.com wrote: Please, bear with me, if I'm not able to properly present my requirement.

[ilugd] Distributed updates in Ubuntu

2010-07-23 Thread Sagar Belure
Please, bear with me, if I'm not able to properly present my requirement. There are some 32 and 64 bit ubuntu systems in same network. I want only one system(like, one 32 and one 64 bit systems) to be updated and upgraded on daily basis. And, rest of the systems, to fetch those updated packages

Re: [ilugd] Distributed updates in Ubuntu

2010-07-23 Thread Vivek Kapoor
On 07/23/2010 06:32 PM, Sagar Belure sagar.bel...@gmail.com wrote: Please, bear with me, if I'm not able to properly present my requirement. There are some 32 and 64 bit ubuntu systems in same network. I want only one system(like, one 32 and one 64 bit systems) to be updated and upgraded on

Re: [ilugd] Distributed updates in Ubuntu

2010-07-23 Thread Anil Seth
On 23 July 2010 18:57, Vivek Kapoor subs...@exain.com wrote: On 07/23/2010 06:32 PM, Sagar Belure sagar.bel...@gmail.com wrote: Please, bear with me, if I'm not able to properly present my requirement. There are some 32 and 64 bit ubuntu systems in same network. I want only one system(like,

Re: [ilugd] Distributed updates in Ubuntu

2010-07-23 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Vivek Kapoor writes: On 07/23/2010 06:32 PM, Sagar Belure sagar.bel...@gmail.com wrote: Please, bear with me, if I'm not able to properly present my requirement. There are some 32 and 64 bit ubuntu systems in same network. I want only one

Re: [ilugd] Distributed updates in Ubuntu

2010-07-23 Thread Vivek Kapoor
On 07/23/2010 07:23 PM, Anil Seth seth.a...@gmail.com wrote: I have used a simplistic approach by linking /var/cache/apt./archives to a common NFS mounted directory. Only requirement is that no root squash option is needed. It does not even matter which system is updated first as all

Re: [ilugd] Distributed updates in Ubuntu

2010-07-23 Thread Anil Seth
On 23 July 2010 19:51, Vivek Kapoor subs...@exain.com wrote: On 07/23/2010 07:23 PM, Anil Seth seth.a...@gmail.com wrote: I have used a simplistic approach by linking /var/cache/apt./archives to a common NFS mounted directory. Only requirement is that no root squash option is needed. It

Re: [ilugd] Distributed updates in Ubuntu

2010-07-23 Thread Vivek Kapoor
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:05:40 +0530, Anil Seth seth.a...@gmail.com wrote: On 23 July 2010 19:51, Vivek Kapoor subs...@exain.com wrote: Wouldn't it create difficulty/corruption if two machines are trying to download a package at the same time? I think the caching tools are designed to prevent