-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Raj" == Raj Shekhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raj> [snip]
Raj> Here is how I did it when I had to do something like this -
Raj> create a script to create the user - using sudo allow apache
Raj> to run that script without givi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "ams" == Abhijit Menon-Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ams> Hi. At 2005-08-19 16:08:43 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ams> wrote:
>> But yes, I have been on this list for a few months, and have
>> not heard anyone actually mention it
[Please upgrade kismet on all distributions -- Raju]
This is an RFC 1153 digest.
(1 message)
--
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart2439995.IIvUN0Vpyz";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
Hi Friends,
> I wanted to create a linux user on the fly(ie. With mine PERL/CGI
> script) .
> Is there a method to do so. I am having a webserver with root access.
> Pl. reply.
Running a apache webserver as root is a bad idea. By default RHEL comes
configured to run the webserver as user nobody.
Greetings,
ams said -
>
> Appropriate behaviour is not learned in a vacuum:
> it's learned through
> repeated interaction and observation. Very few
> people actually *want*
> to make women uncomfortable, but if they don't get
> any feedback about
> what they're doing wrong, they won't know what t
Hi
Just to bring in another perspective. I work for an NGO -that works with
rural communities and natural resource governance. One our main concerns
and areas of work are to involve women in the various aspects of life
that have normally been male bastions. Governance mechanims, involvement
i
At 2005-08-20 08:05:43 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> worst solution i've ever come up with but it should work :)
I really don't think you should advocate running CGI scripts as root,
let alone trying to add users based on input from untrusted clients.
It's a giant security risk that's waitin
try
system("useradd username");
and then to set passwd, put the passwd in a file 2 to 3 times and
system("passwd < file");
worst solution i've ever come up with but it should work :)
i'm not sure if your perl scripts will be run as root. try running a
script that shows you the effective id?
shar
i haven't followed the two links but here are my 2 paise
wep (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WEP) is weak. there are instruction
guides on breaking it available on the net. better go for wpa2
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WEP2).
sharad birmiwal
On 8/19/05, Ankur Rohatgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
At 2005-08-19 14:00:56 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > the prevailing atmosphere is likely to discourage women [...]
>
> And which prevailing atmosphere is this?
There's only one of 'em.
But it's really difficult to express in words just why I think it's
likely to discourage women (and, to
Hi.
At 2005-08-19 16:08:43 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> But yes, I have been on this list for a few months, and have not
> heard anyone actually mention it as a loss- the fact that there
> are no 'active' women on the list.
I don't know what you were expecting to see, but the subject does
Greetings,
Hmm.. a simple query seems to have stirred up a
hornets nest - and maybe for the better. But that
remains to be seen I guess.
Apart from other issues which I think I'll probably
devote another email to..
--- Abhijit Menon-Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
the prevailing
> atmosphere i
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> would claim to be anti-women, but I've often felt that the prevailing
> atmosphere is likely to discourage women from ever visiting more than
the prevailing atmosphere???
- prateek
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-
At 2005-08-19 17:17:31 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In all my experiences, I haven't encountered any sexism towards
> females in areas related to computing. Not even bad jokes.
I wonder if that's because you (and other people) misjudge what might
actually make women uncomfortable. I'm sure
Fri 19-Aug-2005
ILUG-D activity in last 7 days:
=
New/recent events: 0 Total events:48
=
New Discussion forum postings: 5 Total postings: 706
-
Hi Friends,
I wanted to create a linux user on the fly(ie. With mine PERL/CGI
script) .
Is there a method to do so. I am having a webserver with root access.
Pl. reply.
The distro I will be using is Redhat Enterprise Linux.
Thanks for your time and effort.
--
Regards,
Abhishek jain
_
> Take it further and ask- if there are few women, why is it so? And if
> there are a substantial number, why they don't post. And the answer is
> NOT that there are not enough bright women interested in GNU/Linux.
> This is too serious a question to be mentioned as an aside...
>
> And yes, in c
hassath wrote:
> mention it as a loss- the fact that there are no 'active' women on the
> list. So I want to know if you guys have ever at any point felt the need
> for a gender equitable representation on the list? If yes, what steps
> have you taken to find out the reasons- and try to make it con
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 12:54, Raj Mathur wrote:
>
> OK, so in your opinion why are there so few women? Is it an innate
> issue with perceived geekiness? Or something specific to this list
> (or User Group) that keeps them distant? Or do we need to perform
> some specific tasks or activities tha
> "Hassath" == hassath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hassath> [snip]
Hassath> Take it further and ask- if there are few women, why is
Hassath> it so? And if there are a substantial number, why they
Hassath> don't post. And the answer is NOT that there are not
Hassath> enoug
20 matches
Mail list logo
