Hi Pratul
>> Very unfortunately the OSE version is in bad shape due to bad response
>> in the community. The last time I checked, it didn't even end up with
>> a 2.6 kernel while the company FSM Labs continues with its product
>> available at a big price.
>
> I have been using the OSE version of
On Monday 24 November 2008 01:03:01 Linux Lingam wrote:
> dear all,
>
> virtualbox is a GPL-ed software.
> a binary closed-source version of the same software is available as
> freeware with added features.
>
> i can't understand how come this is not a violation of the terms of
> the GPL, specifica
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Pratul Kalia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 1:27 AM, gajendra khanna
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Very unfortunately the OSE version is in bad shape due to bad response
>> in the community. The last time I checked, it didn't even end up wit
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 1:27 AM, gajendra khanna
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very unfortunately the OSE version is in bad shape due to bad response
> in the community. The last time I checked, it didn't even end up with
> a 2.6 kernel while the company FSM Labs continues with its product
> availa
Hi Niyam
> i can't understand how come this is not a violation of the terms of
> the GPL, specifically modifications must also be released under GPL.
> the authors do claim they may eventually roll the enhancements in the
> GPL version.
The site says about the OSE "It is functionally equivalent to
dear all,
virtualbox is a GPL-ed software.
a binary closed-source version of the same software is available as
freeware with added features.
i can't understand how come this is not a violation of the terms of
the GPL, specifically modifications must also be released under GPL.
the authors do clai
