05:24 16:30 SMTPD(043D014E) [192.168.1.3] connect 192.168.1.27 port 2616
05:24 16:30 SMTPD(043D014E) [192.168.1.27] HELO baldrick
05:24 16:30 SMTPD(043D014E) [192.168.1.27] MAIL FROM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
05:24 16:30 SMTPD(043D014E) [192.168.1.27] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05:24 16:30
Have you upgraded to 8.05 HF2 yet? Also you have no rdns either.
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Stratton
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 12:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] Huge Log Files and Queuemgr.exe showing
How would I setup a
rule to block or redirect emails with NULL bodies? Seems like we're
getting a lot of emails in our clients with blank from, to, subjects, and
bodies. I haven't investigated the log yet to see where they're coming
from, but wanted to filter them in the
meantime.
I wonder if this is something to do with
Imailwe see alot of these too, but I don't see any on the Exchange server at
the other location.
- Original Message -
From:
Glenn Bullion
To: IMail_Forum (E-mail)
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:37 AM
Subject: [IMail
Hi,
We have the same thing, except that we have an sender and a subject. Are the spammers
to
stupid to send mails or is it a technical porblem?
Am Dienstag, 25. Mai 2004 um 14:53 schrieben Sie:
I wonder if this is something to do with Imailwe see
We have the same thing, except that we have an sender and a
subject. Are the spammers to stupid to send mails or is it a
technical porblem?
I asume this is something like a verification and DB cleanup mailing. We can
also see this typ of messages in the last days/weeks.
The idea behind
That may be part of it. There is also a link on the readmail.#.cgi
page that allows a forced recheck of mail which states (paraphrased)
Check for new mail ... auto-check every 5 minutes. There is no
specific readmail.cgi file and the code isn't in readmail.html. Oh,
well, the search
I think dropdown.cgi is in 8.05 and earlier versions, but Imail moved
that stuff to headerstart.cgi with the new templates.
Thanks tho,
John
1) Don't know
2) try the dropdown.cgi
Eric S
- Original Message -
From: John Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi,
HTML content filtering has resulted in far to many false positives due to
customers with fancy signatures, so I've decided to drop it.
I've unchecked all HTML filtering features (except for url domains), but
mail stil gets filtered!
Excerpt from the spamlog:
05:25 15:29 SMTP(04102B54)
We get blanks. I was thinking more of a virus. The header does not have
any info on where it came from
Thank You,
Sean Diana
IT Department
Infosynch Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Tuesday,
I am having the same problems but with phrase filters. Removed
offending phrase and also added incoming mail server to whitelist and
trusted ip and still gets filtered
05:25 09:02 SMTP-() Info - Adding Queue file
C:\IMail\spool\Q51fd0354eae9.GSC
05:25 09:02
The whitelist problem kinda applies to me too.
I've UN-whitelisted myself to experiment with filtering of my own mail,
restarted the service, but still;
05:25 16:06 SMTP(04102BE7) Got White List and Content Filter for mail.gul.no
05:25 16:06 SMTP(04102BE7) [gul.no] in white list
Maybe a reboot
1. What are your relay settings.
2. The only way to see what's happening is to look at the
logs. You will need something like UltraEdit or TextPad. to view a log
file this large.
Travis
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dan
Sometimes (not always) the queue manager service needs to be restarted as
well. I'm not sure if that applies to this specific filter but if you
haven't done it, it may be a quick fix.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:39 AM
To:
I upgraded to 8.11 on 5\20. Have not seen SMTP fail. Uhh Yet...
Thank You,
Sean Diana
IT Department
Infosynch Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge
Some of our clients want their outgoing email smart hosted through an outside SMTP
server. We are using iMail as the backend for a web based solution, so they can't
configure Outlook to talk to this outside SMTP server.
What I am investigating is whether it's possible to set an outgoing rule
Keep the list up to date on this if you have time Sean. I continue to have
the problem and if 8.11 fixes it I'll happily upgrade.
-Original Message-
From: Sean Diana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] SMTP no more
That seemed to work - but only if the SMTP service is also stopped while the
queuemanager is restarted!(?)
Weird stuff, but thanks alot :)
- Eric
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne av Langston, Cale
Sendt: 25. mai 2004 16:30
Til: [EMAIL
BareTail also works great and allows you to view
the file in realtime.
http://www.baremetalsoft.com/baretail/
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Rabe
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:26 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Huge Log Files and Queuemgr.exe
I'm getting the same problem with my phrase filters... it keeps filtering on
something that's been removed and restarted the services...
Don Kiiskila
Network Administrator
Snapstream Media
http://www.snapstream.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Been cruising along fine with 8.11 for some weeks now. Then, all of a
sudden this morning slapd.exe started taking 50-80% processor all the
time, even after several reboots. Has any one had experience as to why
this might be the case and if so, how to fix it? I am being 'slapped'.
;)
--
Roger
Have you recently run an INIT on any domain? If so this takes a long time
and is very processor intensive.
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Lee Heath
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Reply to: Travis Rabe
Re: [IMail Forum] Slapd.exe processor use on Tuesday 11:04:30 AM
No I have not.
Thanks,
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
TR Have you recently run an INIT on any domain? If so this takes a long time
TR and
BareTail also works great and allows you to view the file in realtime.
http://www.baremetalsoft.com/baretail/http://www.baremetalsoft.com/baretail/
for high-volume logs, tailing is useless as the lines scroll past too fast
too read.
But combining tailing with filtering
tail -f /path/to/logfile
I have just started playing with the listserver functionality and have hit
a few problems.
Is there anyway to configure it so that the recipient's address appears in
the header - trying to route messages from an Imail list is proving tricky.
Regards,
Julian Voelcker
To Unsubscribe:
True...but you don't have to tail all of the time. You can tail for a few
seconds, then stop and analyze the log. But you're right in that filtering
is a glaring omission in BareTail. Highlighting helps, but filtering would
be best...especially with a toggle feature that allows you to inspect
KB manual don't help with following, so ...
1. How do I disable the auto-check for mail in web messaging?
Search on META HTTP-EQUIV=REFRESH in the web folder. Remove all lines
found with this tag.
2. How do I remove particular items from the account options drop-down
menu? Each
This whole thing makes KiwiSyslogger so helpful and extremely worth while.
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Huge Log Files and
We have being getting lots of this NULL body messages. I set up the following rule,
but it does not work... can anybody tell me the right format. Thanks,
B~NULL Body!!:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
B~NULL Body:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mariella Cardinale
Summit Brokerage Services, Inc.
Ph: 561/338-2883
Fax:
I disagree.
ORDB certainly appears to be up and working (it is the 7th of 8 RBL's that
we check - we delete the message after two matches). Did a search of my
spam logs for this month and found quite a few matches.
Here is the last one:
05:17 20:51 SMTPD(85f51d9b008a9669) [2920] domain.com
Is there anyway to configure it so that the recipient's address
appears in the header -
No. A list server (list exploder) uses envelope sending only, with
identical message headers/bodies.
trying to route messages from an Imail list is proving tricky.
Route...? How so? Are you
I am having some really odd problems with a mailing list.
I have created a new domain and setup a mailing list on an Imail 8.05
installation.
I joined a couple of email accounts on a couple of the other domains on the
server to test the messages and have hit a problem.
One of the accounts works
What I am investigating is whether it's possible to set an outgoing
rule in iMail to act on mail with a specified header item and
smarthost all that mail to an outside server.
No, you cannot smarthost based on sender information.
I know, for example, that I could redirect to
Yes, I do think there is a legitimate need for this. More and more of our outgoing
email is getting caught in spam filters. Some of our customers want to send the mail
through their servers because they do less traffic, and beleive they would be able to
get the messages through.
-Chase
If there is anyone that would be willing to answer a couple of
questions, please contact me off-list.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Todd Holt
Xidix Technologies, Inc
Las Vegas, NV USA
702.319.4349
www.xidix.com
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
To
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chase Seibert
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] iMail outgoing rule to smarthost to another
server?
Yes, I do think there is a
Yes, I do think there is a legitimate need for this. More and more
of our outgoing email is getting caught in spam filters.
Are you getting publicly blacklisted that often, but not scanning the
outbound messages yourself?
Some of our customers want to send the mail through their servers
I was using !-- -- like it was html. DUH, .cgi, not .html. Should have
told me something. How dumb.
THANKS.
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Use // comment markers to comment out the lines you want to remove
Comment out
That is OK I did the same thing and watched it blow up. the I realized that
it was a javascript.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Carter
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 11:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail
Hello All,
I have just tried merging the new URL Blacklist file with my current one
and I keep having troubles when using the Utility provided my Curt Warner
and Turner 3D. I am trying to determine if the problem is with the utility
or the files. I have gone through the newest URL blacklist
It does look like it is up and running, but the value of ORDB is what I
am beginning to question. It seems like we see an average of 5 hits per
day from ORDB compared to 20,000 incomming messages. That doesn't seem
worthwhile to run this test anymore.
Jason
-Original Message-
From:
I think I saw, back in the 1st part of May, where there was a post from the creator
about this issue. He was aware of it and working on a newer version of the software.
I don't remember if he had a temp fix or not, but the issue was the software could
only handle so many tens of thousands of
Oops - you're right. There was a temp fix for it right here,
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg84112.html
What about the entries in the list though - is this a problem?
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Mc Cay
OK Travis. I found the message. Here it is below. Hope it helps.
Re: [IMail Forum] Blacklist Manager
From: Curt Turner
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Blacklist Manager
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 10:20:42 -0700
Our Imail 8.10 choked last night and stopped sending mail. Inbound
connections were ok, but all outbound sending stopped. Looking this
morning I found tons of these in the log files around the time it
stopped:
Connect fail x.x.x.x [x.x.x.x]: no buffer space available
Found nothing in the list
Not too sure. See, I've decided to wait for the newer version of the software, as
opposed to attempting to apply the update. Sorry about that. I just remember
struggling with this back in April. Hope someone else can jump in here and help you
out.
jim
-- Original Message
That update worked great - now my list is up to 37,750 or so. I still
wonder whether or not Ipswitch has meant to add these odd looking lines into
the file.
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Mc Cay
Sent: Tuesday, May 25,
By and large we are not getting caught by content filtering, but by DNS blacklists. For a while some sites were rejecting us because we were in the same IP block as a casino website. We have been getting blocked for not having a RDNS entry on outbound3.bullhorn.com [209.202.131.98], which is not
ORDB has always been good, I have similar low hit ratios but when it does
hit its very rarely a false positive. Prior to the virus writers and
spammers teaming up to create armies of spam zombies, open relays installed
by knuckleheads were the prefered spamming vector, they dont need them
anymore
Hi! My Imail Server doesnt deliver mail to Hotmail. I
set verbose logging, and I get this from log file:
20040525 140506
127.0.0.1 SMTP () Info - Adding
Queue file m:\IMail\spool\Qa6f2000a010080bf.SMD
20040525 140506
127.0.0.1 SMTP (03C403D0) processing
m:\IMail\spool
I am currently out of the office
I will be back Tuesday 6/1/2004
Please call the helpdesk on x4040 with any urgent issues
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ:
Hi Sandy,
On 25-May-2004 18:42:04, wrote:
trying to route messages from an Imail list is proving tricky.
Route...? How so? Are you using some kind of body-sensitive POP3
deaggregator or something?
The problem seems to be with one particular account. All the emails
from that account
Hi,
I made the experience, that the url blacklist filter does not work properly. Only 20 to
25% will be catched by the url blacklist filter. I'm not talking about missformated
mails
or tricks.
Actually I'm adding the url's as a phrase too. But this can't be the solution.
What is your
I have never had a problem with the URL blacklist feature. It does an
excellent job. If you are only experiencing problem you should open a
support ticket.
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Schaible
Sent: Tuesday, May
David ,
Do you have Trend's InterScan viruswall in front of your Imail Server
and your outgoing mail is pass through InterScan ?
If so, that's the reason. I have been got the same issue.
You can go to Trendmicro web site search in KB for this issue.
Thanks ..
Jason Chen
- Original Message
I'd also be
interested in a solution here. With the advent of AOL's big "spam button,"
ISPs need to be able to identify to whom an individual message was sent using
something other than the header fields so that if someone hits the spam button
and reports a message as spam, the ISP can do
IMail's listserv does indeed add that header entry.
Checking the header of your email to the IMail list I see:
---
X-Sender: Julian Voelcker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For the AOL problem, we add a custom header via
Declude to identify the sender and notify them that they are jeopardizing the
relay service by reporting mail that we relay for them as spam. If they
continue, then we stop relaying and strongly encourage them to pick up mail
directly from our
Route...? How so? Are you using some kind of body-sensitive POP3
deaggregator or something?
...and are then picked up using an Exchange connector called
PopWeasel and forwarded to our exchange server.
Ha! Knew it. :)
The problem seems to be that the POP3 connector isn't able to
We have been getting blocked for not having a RDNS entry on
outbound3.bullhorn.com [209.202.131.98], which is not true but no
one seems to care.
Who's blocking you for that spurious reason? Whoever's doing that is
likely to do the same to anyone's magic smarthost.
Either
60 matches
Mail list logo
