Re: [efloraofindia:406771] Re: IDENTITY : 60 a, 60 b, 60 c

May be Ficus heterophylla? On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 8:12:07 PM UTC+5:30 tchakrab wrote: > Okay Saroj ji. > > On Mon, 15 Nov 2021, 20:10 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > >> May not be ficus Tapas Da ? >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 6:34 PM Tapas Chakrabarty

[efloraofindia:406769] Names of Plants in India :: Brachycorythis wightii Summerh.

*Brachycorythis wightii* Summerh. [image: Brachycorythis wightii Summerh.] *brak-ee-ko-RYE-this* -- Greek: *brachy* (short) and *corys* (helmet), referring to the flower shape ... Dave's Botanary *WIGHT-ee-eye* --

Re: [efloraofindia:406769] MS,Nov.,2021/60 Boehmeria sp. for id.

Dear sir, please attach clear images of the leaves pattern, from these images it may be* B.rugulosa* as the *leaves arrangements are alternate. * Thank you Sunit Singh Chauhan On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 9:29:53 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > *Boehmeria penduliflora* Wedd. ex

Re: [efloraofindia:406767] Flora of Uttarara Kannada_ID_Please_16112021 PK1

Ficus concinna, With regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack 11/16/21, 12:01:41 PM On Tue, 16 Nov 2021

Re: [efloraofindia:406766] tree id ?

This is not a tree, it's a climber i.e. Rivea ornata, With regards. [image: Mailtrack] Sender notified by Mailtrack

Re: [efloraofindia:406763] MS,Nov.,2021/27 Tree for id.

Sarcosperma arboreum? On Tue, 16 Nov 2021, 05:23 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Tapas ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Mon, 15 Nov, 2021, 6:21 pm Tapas Chakrabarty, > wrote: > >> This is Cryptocarya of Lauraceae. A number of new species (3-4) were >> described by Gangopadhyay in 2006

Re: [efloraofindia:406761] MS,Nov.,2021/27 Tree for id.

Thanks, Tapas ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon, 15 Nov, 2021, 6:21 pm Tapas Chakrabarty, wrote: > This is Cryptocarya of Lauraceae. A number of new species (3-4) were > described by Gangopadhyay in 2006 and it seems one of them. > > On Mon, 15 Nov 2021, 11:43 J.M. Garg, wrote: > >>

Re: [efloraofindia:406761] MS,Nov.,2021/27 Tree for id.

Thanks, Kanhaiya Lal ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Mon, 15 Nov, 2021, 6:36 pm Kanhaiya Lal Chaudhary, < klchaudhar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Garg ji, > Any chances of it being some Sarcosperma species? > Regards > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:43 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Sawmliana

[efloraofindia:406761] Re: 1803011-PR For ID- Chennai

First picture looks like Schleichera oleosa...not sure On Sunday, November 14, 2021 at 10:11:20 PM UTC+5:30 Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed asUnidentified 2 > > >

Re: [efloraofindia:406759] MS,Nov.,2021/60 Boehmeria sp. for id.

*Boehmeria penduliflora* Wedd. ex D.G.Long Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 9:27 PM M Sawmliana wrote: > Location : Vaphai > Date : 04-10-2018 > Habit : Shrub or small tree ? > Habitat : Wild > > With regards, > M.Sawmliana > > -- > You received this message because you are

[efloraofindia:406757] Re: 194 ID wild plant Desmodium

OK Sam ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 9:19 PM Sam Kuzhalanattu wrote: > Yes, it is dear Saroj ji, thank you very much for ID my plant. The plant > is growing in front of a neighborhood house very near to a narrow mud > walk/path way, but also all branches of the plant

[efloraofindia:406754] Re: 194 ID wild plant Desmodium

Yes, it is dear Saroj ji, thank you very much for ID my plant. The plant is growing in front of a neighborhood house very near to a narrow mud walk/path way, but also all branches of the plant fully obliqued to the way as a disturbance to walkers, as a result, branches were trimmed by walkers

Re: [efloraofindia:406755] MS,Nov.,2021/58 Tree(Araliaceae?) for id.

*Schefflera* *pueckleri* (K. Koch) Frodin ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 1:40 PM M Sawmliana wrote: > Location : Tualbung road > Date : 07-07-2016 > Habit : Tree > Habitat : Wild > > With regards, > M.Sawmliana > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed

[efloraofindia:406754] Re: 194 ID wild plant Desmodium

Yes, it is dear Garg ji, thank you very much for ID my plant. The plant is growing in front of a neighborhood house very near to a narrow mud walk/path way, but also all branches of the plant fully obliqued to the way as a disturbance to walkers, as a result, branches were trimmed by walkers

Re: [efloraofindia:406753] Re: 193 ID wild plant Evolvulus

OK Sam ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 4:02 PM Sam Kuzhalanattu wrote: > Yes, it is dear Saroj ji, thank you very much for ID my plant, kind > regards, Sam. > > On Mon, 15 Nov 2021, 9:15 am Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > >> *Evolvulus nummularius* (L.) L. >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj

[efloraofindia:406752] Re: Begonia picta Sm. ???

OK Dr. Mark ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 9:06 PM Mark Hughes wrote: > It is definiteyl not B. thomsonii, and doesn’t match anything from the > region. Potentially new sp. > > > > *From:* Saroj Kasaju > *Sent:* 15 November 2021 2:48 PM > *To:* Mark Hughes > *Cc:*

[efloraofindia:406751] Re: SK 3113 06 November 2021

Thank you Dr. Adhikari ! Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 8:54 PM Bhaskar Adhikari wrote: > Yes, it is Eranthemum purpurascens Wight ex Nees. > > Regards > > Bhas > > > > *From:* Saroj Kasaju > *Sent:* 15 November 2021 12:51 > *To:* Bhaskar Adhikari > *Cc:* efloraindia ; J.M. Garg < >

[efloraofindia:406749] RE: SK 3113 06 November 2021

Yes, it is Eranthemum purpurascens Wight ex Nees. Regards Bhas From: Saroj Kasaju Sent: 15 November 2021 12:51 To: Bhaskar Adhikari Cc: efloraindia ; J.M. Garg Subject: Re: SK 3113 06 November 2021

Re: [efloraofindia:406746] Re: IDENTITY : 60 a, 60 b, 60 c

Okay Saroj ji. On Mon, 15 Nov 2021, 20:10 Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > May not be ficus Tapas Da ? > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 6:34 PM Tapas Chakrabarty > wrote: > >> Might be Ficus. Bimal da's inbox is bouncing back. >> >> On Mon, 15 Nov 2021, 16:35 J.M. Garg,

Re: [efloraofindia:406746] Re: IDENTITY : 60 a, 60 b, 60 c

May not be ficus Tapas Da ? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 6:34 PM Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > Might be Ficus. Bimal da's inbox is bouncing back. > > On Mon, 15 Nov 2021, 16:35 J.M. Garg, wrote: > >> Any idea about the family or genus? >> >> -- Forwarded message

Re: [efloraofindia:406745] Re: 194 ID wild plant Desmodium

*Codariocalyx motorius *(Houtt.) H.Ohashi ?? Too many close-ups. Need shots from some distance also. Image of another sp. tree trunk was not necessary Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 8:04 PM Sam Kuzhalanattu wrote: > Sharing more images > > On Mon, 15 Nov 2021, 7:46 pm Sam

[efloraofindia:406735] Re: Tamil name(s) of Blepharis maderaspatensis (L.) B.Heyne ex Roth

Yes, yes !!! Thanks very much dear Muthu !!! Regards. Dinesh On Mon, 15 Nov 2021, 18:05 Muthu Karthick, wrote: > Hi Dinesh ji, > > Vijayasankar ji gave us the perfect answer. > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 8:18 AM Dinesh Valke > wrote: > >> Thank you very very much Vijayasankar ji for the help,

Re: [efloraofindia:406734] MS,Nov.,2021/27 Tree for id.

Dear Sawmliana ji, If Cryptocarya, then it may be a new record also. Please try to collect specimens. On Mon, 15 Nov 2021, 18:21 Tapas Chakrabarty, wrote: > This is Cryptocarya of Lauraceae. A number of new species (3-4) were > described by Gangopadhyay in 2006 and it seems one of them. > > On

[efloraofindia:406729] Re: Tree for ID : Atlanta, Georgia : 18JAN19 : AK-37

Gurcharan Ji, Thanks for forwarding my earlier Acer post from Atlanta. Regards, Aarti On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 8:28 PM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding again for ID > Distributed as Acer platanoides (USA)? >

Re: [itpmods:16157] Fwd: [efloraofindia:406727] Wild Plant for ID : Nasik : 29OCT21 : AK - 029

Thanks Lalithamba Ji and Garg Ji. Unlikely to be an exotic plant as it is like a forest. Regards, Aarti On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 8:45 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Lalithamba Avadhanam > Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 at 20:26 > Subject: Re: [itpmods:16157]

Re: [efloraofindia:406721] Fwd: SK602 27 JUN-2017:ID

You seem to be right Mr. Garg ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 4:05 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, some possibility. > Pl. check *Nepeta lamiopsis* Benth. ex Hook.f. > > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 22:32, Saroj Kasaju wrote: >

[efloraofindia:406720] Re: SK 3092 30 October 2021

OK Mr. Garg ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 1:55 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Based on the altitude given in Flora of Bhutan and flowering time, let us > keep it as Bistorta macrophylla > > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 21:51,

[efloraofindia:406719] Re: SK 3091 30 October 2021

OK Mr. Garg ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 1:04 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > So let us keep it as *Devendraea angustifolia* (Wall. ex DC.) Pusalkar > > > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 16:39,

Re: [efloraofindia:406718] MS,Nov.,2021/27 Tree for id.

This is Cryptocarya of Lauraceae. A number of new species (3-4) were described by Gangopadhyay in 2006 and it seems one of them. On Mon, 15 Nov 2021, 11:43 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Sawmliana ji > > -- Forwarded message - > From: M Sawmliana > Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 11:39

[efloraofindia:406717] Re: SK 3113 06 November 2021

https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/LsM1YZSmg8w/m/y-3G3-OxBgAJ Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 3:23 PM Bhaskar Adhikari wrote: > I can't see the images of Eranthemum. Could you please send them again. > > B > > > > *From:* J.M. Garg > *Sent:* 14 November 2021 06:12 >

[efloraofindia:406716] Re: IDENTITY : 60 a, 60 b, 60 c

Might be Ficus. Bimal da's inbox is bouncing back. On Mon, 15 Nov 2021, 16:35 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Any idea about the family or genus? > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Bimal Sar kar > Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 08:53 > Subject: IDENTITY : 60 a, 60 b, 60 c > To: > > > Attaching

Re: [efloraofindia:406715] MS,Oct,2021/80 Antidesma sp. for id

Not possible to confirm whether Antidesma acidum without seeing the male flowers. On Mon, 15 Nov 2021, 18:02 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Hi, Tapas ji, > Leaves look a bit different and apex obtuse. > Can it be *Antidesma acidum* Retz. >

[efloraofindia:406714] Re: Tamil name(s) of Blepharis maderaspatensis (L.) B.Heyne ex Roth

Hi Dinesh ji, Vijayasankar ji gave us the perfect answer. On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 8:18 AM Dinesh Valke wrote: > Thank you very very much Vijayasankar ji for the help, and for the > additional names too. > Regards. > Dinesh > > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 10:35 PM Vijayasankar > wrote: > >> Dear

Re: [efloraofindia:406713] MS,Oct,2021/80 Antidesma sp. for id

Hi, Tapas ji, Leaves look a bit different and apex obtuse. Can it be *Antidesma acidum* Retz. ? On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 14:37, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Tapas ji and Saroj ji > > On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 at 01:37,

Re: [efloraofindia:406711] Fwd: IDENTITY : 60 a, 60 b, 60 c

No idea, Sir. Regards surajit On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 16:35, J.M. Garg wrote: > Any idea about the family or genus? > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Bimal Sar kar > Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 08:53 > Subject: IDENTITY : 60 a, 60 b, 60 c > To: > > > Attaching three images of a

[efloraofindia:406710] Re: [itpmods:16109] Fwd: SK 3016 05 October 2021

There is a lot of taxonomic confusion between the two. Pl. see discussions at Mentha longifolia subsp. hymalaiensis As per keys in Flora of Pakistan , 4 (3)

[efloraofindia:406709] Re: IDENTITY : 55

Any probability of the other one, i.e. *Chasalia curviflora*? Thank you Regards surajit On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 18:03, J.M. Garg wrote: > This looks different from Psychotria monticola Kurz as per POWO > > specimens-

[efloraofindia:406708] Fwd: MS, Oct.,2021/18 Begonia sp. for id.: 2

Thanks a lot, Mark ji -- Forwarded message - From: Mark Hughes Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 17:04 Subject: RE: MS, Oct.,2021/18 Begonia sp. for id.: 2 To: J.M. Garg B. thomsonii *From:* J.M. Garg *Sent:* 15 November 2021 11:31 AM *To:* efloraofindia *Cc:* M Sawmliana

Re: [efloraofindia:406706] Garden Plant For ID : Kenya : 21DEC16 : AK-43

I do not think so. On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 11:02, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > By any chance, could it be Safflower? > Aarti > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 10:50 AM Aarti S. Khale > wrote: > >> Gurcharan Ji, Saroj Ji, >> Thanks for forwarding my earlier post from Kenya. >> I guess it is difficult without

Re: [efloraofindia:406705] Requesting a herb id (08112021)

Pl. check comparative images at Murdannia On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 10:47, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Sachin ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Sachin Bhaskar > Date: Mon, 8 Nov, 2021, 11:36 am

[efloraofindia:406702] Re: Requesting a herb id (08112021)2

Yes, Rungia. On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 16:51, J.M. Garg wrote: > Justicia , Images not clear ! > Thank you. > Saroj Kasaju > > -- Forwarded message - > From: J.M. Garg > Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 16:50 > Subject: Requesting a herb id (08112021)2 > To: efloraofindia > Cc: Sachin

[efloraofindia:406700] Fwd: IDENTITY : 59 a, 59 b, 59 c

Thanks a lot, Kishor ji -- Forwarded message - From: Kishor K C Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 16:33 Subject: Re: IDENTITY : 59 a, 59 b, 59 c To: J.M. Garg Appears to be Grewia multiflora Syn: Grewia serrulata On Mon, 15 Nov, 2021, 1:04 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: > Forwarding again for

[efloraofindia:406699] Re: Tree For ID : Bangalore : 26JAN17 : AK-7

Flowers look different from images at Melia dubia (Tree For ID : Bangalore : 02DEC16 : AK-4 ) On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 10:43, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Yes, It's the same tree in

Re: [efloraofindia:406697] Re: 186 ID wild plant

Dear Garg ji, Paradesi ji, all Members, Thank you very much for ID my plant, with kind regards, Sam. On Mon, 15 Nov 2021, 11:35 am J.M. Garg, wrote: > Yes matches with images at Spermacoce alata > > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 11:28, Sam

Re: [efloraofindia:406695] Re: 140 ID wild plant Commelina

May I request Mayur ji, to pl. say something on it. On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 23:01, Sam Kuzhalanattu wrote: > Sharing more images > > On Sun, 31 Oct 2021, 6:24 pm Sam Kuzhalanattu, > wrote: > >> Today's beauty >> >> On Sat, 30 Oct 2021, 12:51 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: >> >>> I think *Cyanotis

Re: [efloraofindia:406694] Fwd: X'mas tree

I think looks different as per images at Araucaria araucana (Cultivated) Also looks different from images at Picea On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 22:34, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Image not clear !

Re: [efloraofindia:406693] Fwd: SK602 27 JUN-2017:ID

Yes, some possibility. Pl. check *Nepeta lamiopsis* Benth. ex Hook.f. On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 22:32, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Lamiaceae? Nepeta ? > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 8:49 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > >>

Re: [efloraofindia:406692] Re: 193 ID wild plant Evolvulus

Yes, it is dear Saroj ji, thank you very much for ID my plant, kind regards, Sam. On Mon, 15 Nov 2021, 9:15 am Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > *Evolvulus nummularius* (L.) L. > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 11:56 PM Sam Kuzhalanattu < > samkuzhalana...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>

Re: [efloraofindia:406690] MS,Nov.,2021/29 Tetrastigma sp. ? for id.

Fruits look different in *Tetrastigma rumicispermum* (M.A. Lawson) Planch. What are the keys? To me appears more close to images at *Tetrastigma aplinianum* (Collett & Hemsl.) Momiy.

Re: [efloraofindia:406690] MS,Nov.,2021/29 Tetrastigma sp. ? for id.

What are the keys? To me appears more close to images at *Tetrastigma aplinianum* (Collett & Hemsl.) Momiy. , as per images and details herein and as per comparative images at Tetrastigma

[efloraofindia:406689] Names of Plants in India :: Blumea lanceolaria (Roxb.) Druce

*Blumea lanceolaria* (Roxb.) Druce [image: Blumea lanceolaria (Roxb.) Druce] *blum-EE-uh* -- named after Karl Ludwig von Blume, Dutch botanist ... Plant Names - Scientific and Popular • Plant genera named after people

[efloraofindia:406688] Re: SK 3092 30 October 2021

Based on the altitude given in Flora of Bhutan and flowering time, let us keep it as Bistorta macrophylla On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 21:51, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Keys based on leaves but unfortunately not leaf images since image > shot by