Hi all,
Just an FYI - I've moved off of the Factory 2 team inside Red Hat to
take a different role in the internal devops organization there.
Luiz Carvalho (lucarval in both FAS and irc) takes my place leading
the Factory 2 team! He's a good point of contact for greenwave, MBS,
ODCS and freshmak
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 03:42:06PM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote:
> I'd like to upgrade MBS on either Monday or Tuesday of next week to
> module-build-service-2.6.0-1.el7 and libmodulemd-1.6.3-2.el7.
>
> - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-0a7
I'd like to upgrade MBS on either Monday or Tuesday of next week to
module-build-service-2.6.0-1.el7 and libmodulemd-1.6.3-2.el7.
- https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-0a7da7520d
- https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-ee8aeba3a6
There is no database migrat
LGTM. Easy to roll back if it is incorrect. +1
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:05:08AM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> diff --git a/roles/openshift-apps/greenwave/templates/configmap.yml
> b/roles/openshift-apps/greenwave/templ
> index dd297c4..694ca3c 100644
> --- a/roles/openshift-apps/greenwave/templa
--
> Zach Villers
> z...@mailup.net
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018, at 9:25 AM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > FWIW, there's a change to the way messaging works with BZ5.
> >
> > - Messages are published to a different queue. Someone will need to
> > update bugzilla2fedmsg
FWIW, there's a change to the way messaging works with BZ5.
- Messages are published to a different queue. Someone will need to
update bugzilla2fedmsg to pull from the new right place.
- The message format changes, but I think it may only be additive.
Someone should verify that we don't need
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 05:01:56PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 05/15/2018 08:08 AM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> > Greetings!
> >
> > At the hackathon we did recently, we talked about the need for one of us
> > to attend the Modularity WG meetings so we could be more aware of what
> > work is coming ou
A new release of pdc-updater is out, fixing a bug in the retirement handler.
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6928
0.9.2
-
Pull Requests
- #86, Merge pull request #86 from fedora-infra/dont-overwrite
https://github.com/fedora-infra/pdc-updater/pull/86
Commits
- 65ebd4ad9 Do
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 12:12:50PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On 05/09/2018 12:07 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> > Aaand it also doesn't work in production. I tested the Greenwave API
> > just yesterday and it did return the data that Bodhi looks for. Today
> > the exact same query omits the speci
Thanks! This is done now:
https://greenwave-web-greenwave.app.os.fedoraproject.org/api/v1.0/policies
I fixed two other little things while I was in there:
-
https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=01d70107fca595715931861e80a7e642f9df191b
-
https://infrastructure.f
Discussed in #fedora-admin just now.
Modules are configure to require some test cases that never actually
get run for them. This patch should treat them instead like we do
epel: no CI requirements.
Any +1s?
diff --git a/roles/openshift-apps/greenwave/templates/configmap.yml
b/roles/openshift-a
+1 here too. It's easy to revert by downgrading the rpm if it blows up.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:42:33AM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> +1
>
> On 04/20/2018 08:36 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this is FBR to fix MBS traceback which prevents builds of modules in
> > situation when new
+1 here on either version of the patch. :)
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 12:37:36PM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 02/23/2018 01:38 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 05:14:38PM +, ajay vembu wrote:
> >>Hi Dusty,
> >>I will start working on it. I will let you know if I any queries.Â
> >
> > Thanks for lookin
Way back in May some of us were in Raleigh for a Hackathon:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CI_and_Infrastructure_Hackathon_2017
There, we talked about the MBS and wondered what kind of new storage
requirements it would impose on koji. We all worried about it, but we didn't
have numbers to figure o
+1 here too.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Thanks!
Applied:
https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=fe795ff8de2615b58a84ef7d80a919a5dad26304
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le..
Karsten Hopp reported an issue with the MBS that his module builds of
modules/krb5 and modules/udisks2 failed, because the MBS failed to tag
them into f27-modular-updates-candidate at the end of the build. The
module names weren't in the pkg list.
I've added them directly to get him going again,
Just a few small bugfixes to pdc-updater here.
0.6.3
-
Pull Requests
- (@ralphbean) #73, Ignore modules in the build state.
https://github.com/fedora-infra/pdc-updater/pull/73
- (@hanzz) #74, Use different way to call PDC API to workaround 404
bug for valid modules in PDC.
Oh, I wonder how that worked before. Hm..
It looks like the old server from openshift would automatically redirect to
/en/ if no language was specified.
https://github.com/fedora-infra/asknot-ng/blob/develop/.openshift/diy/pythonserver.py
___
infrastr
http://whatcanidoforfedora.org is back (the dns change is still propagating).
Patrick and I set up an ansibilized cronjob on sundries01 to build it
and sync it out to the proxies, similar to how our other websites are
built.
Ricky's going to proceed with looking at how to auto-build it in
os.fedo
Hey all,
Just like in for the ODCS RFR[1], I'm sending out a ping here about
the Freshmaker RFR:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6183#comment-471098
I tried to put a bunch of context about what it is and vaguely how it
works in the proposed SOP:
https://pagure.io/infra-doc
Welcome :)
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hey all,
I had a chat with Patrick yesterday and walked through the various
parts of the RFR process that my team has done a less than great job
of following. I never built up a good habit of following the RFR
process to the letter. Sorry for this. Will try to do a better job.
Patrick put toget
Applied here:
http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=aab2ea4590853acb8f631f4fae293e03df50e6cb
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lis
Applied:
https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=18b7ea4435e2a28b65fae2dc9161900d7e961a1e
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.f
Mohan and Matt found yesterday that the koji pkglist sync script was hung (for
two hours) waiting on a koji query. We looked today, and found that the
default timeout for koji requests is 12 hours! (whee!)
Here's a patch to that script that sets a timeout of 10 minutes which, based on
a reading
> How long is it taking to do a sync?
I'm not sure. Patrick noticed it in #fedora-noc.
> And would it be better to schedule the cron job to be non-daily in that case?
Possibly, yes. (Likely still good to also put a lock on it).
___
infrastructure mai
... or even if you didn't like it, it still probably needs a lock.
/usr/local/bin/pagure-sync-bugzilla.py takes more than 24 hours to
run, and it doesn't have a lock wrapper on it. It needs one.
diff --git a/roles/distgit/pagure/tasks/main.yml
b/roles/distgit/pagure/tasks/main.yml
index
OK, this is all done and upgrade and tested as far as I can test it.
My build of the `testmodule` module succeeded.
https://mbs.fedoraproject.org/module-build-service/1/module-builds/953
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproje
> That is a major code change on a Friday. What is the DB upgrade parts
> and if there are further changes/problems what is the backout plan?
The db change is here: https://pagure.io/fm-orchestrator/pull-request/686#_1,18
Two new added columns.
The MBS (like many of our other apps) uses `alembi
Hi,
I'd like to upgrade the MBS to:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-1db0646bc6
In particular, the bit about "Wait for components to be tagged also in
final tag before marking module as done. This should fix an issue for
the F27 compose." is important. See
https://pagure
New news: the Server SIG decided to go with a traditional release for F27:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-09-12/serversig.2017-09-12-20.00.html
- They still want to do a non-blocking modular release on the side (kind of
like boltron).
- We will still want/need to have
This came up in the FESCo meeting today.
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/1795
In my last discussions with Randy, we were planning on merging,
releasing, and deploying the modular bodhi masher work after Beta
freeze thawed - but FESCo would rather see proof of it before freeze
is up.
A new pdc-updater release!
There are a few bugfixes related to the MBS, but crucially there is a new
handler for propagating retirement: When a `dead.package` file gets committed,
the code here (on pdc-backend0*) will update the EOL of that branch in PDC,
indicating retirement.
0.6.0
-
Pull
Introducing some retry stuff to be more resilient when pagure blips:
https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=b084a7762f00f110f2b73158a66b577ec01a9cfd
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fixed in
https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=24141e596b989de79c04111291aab09effe49580
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fe
I'm confused about something. Can any postfix experts help debug?
On Friday I put a new package-owner-alias cronjob in place on bastion
(that Matt Prahl wrote). It generates the package owner list from
pagure over dist-git instead of generating it from pkgdb.
https://infrastructure.fedorap
LGTM.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 08:20:29AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 06/28/2017 02:57 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> > I did not realize this before, but this will impact the decommissioning of
> > pkgdb.
> > The idea was to deploy pagure on dist-git on July 5th and deprecate pkgdb on
> > July 10t
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 10:06:56AM -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> The modularity-testing-framework tests use avocado to output nice HTML
> reports but due to the way that we store and serve the artifacts, the
> css doesn't load properly. An example (that should work post-fix) is:
>
> https://taskotron.
Thanks, this is done now:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.
This just got approved in FESCo today.
I'd like to manually apply this patch to the pkgdb web nodes in prod:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/pkgdb2/pull/415
It's a template and css change that adds a banner informing packagers
of the pending plans for:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Arbit
Cheers on os.stg.fedoraproject.org!
I'd love to have waiverdb[1] be the first app on os.fedoraproject.org
once it is ready. Do you guys have any estimates of when we could
start messing with that in both stg and prod? (Maybe we could help
you work out kinks if we can try deploying to os.stg.fp.o
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 02:35:20PM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> For the automated rebuilds work[1][2], we're going to need a service
> account with rights to do various things (only in staging for now).
> For container rebuilds, it will need to be able to request n
CC'ing the rel-eng list for visibility.
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 02:35:20PM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> For the automated rebuilds work[1][2], we're going to need a service
> account with rights to do various things (only in staging for now).
> For container
Hey all,
For the automated rebuilds work[1][2], we're going to need a service
account with rights to do various things (only in staging for now).
For container rebuilds, it will need to be able to request new OSBS
builds via koji. For module rebuilds, it will need to be able to
commit to dist-git
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 01:36:50PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 04/25/2017 08:23 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> ...snip...
> > Now going through each of the requirements listed above
> > - Store point of contact for a package (default assignee on bugzilla)
> > - we could use the first committe
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 02:31:19PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 16:23 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > - Store point of contact for a package (default assignee on bugzilla)
> > - we could use the first committer, alphabetically
> > - we could use the 'owner', but we ne
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 07:59:46PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 04/25/2017 07:48 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 06:46:40PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> >> On 04/25/2017 04:23 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >>> - Store koshei integration
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 07:56:06PM +0200, Michael Šimáček wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-04-25 19:48, Ralph Bean wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 06:46:40PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> >>On 04/25/2017 04:23 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >>>- Store koshei integr
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 06:46:40PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 04/25/2017 04:23 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > - Store koshei integration flag
> > - store this in a yaml/toml file in the dist-git repo
> > - let the consumers
> > - do an http request to retrieve the file
> > -
New release includes a fix to support the module build service.
The koji tag names we were constructing were too long.
0.5.5
-
Pull Requests
- #53, Merge pull request #53 from hanzz/module-hash
https://github.com/fedora-infra/pdc-updater/pull/53
Commits
- b0f14d1f8 Use hash instead of va
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 09:57:15AM -0600, InvalidPath wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>
> > This was a project that Ralph Bean started to try and get an idea of
> > what it could be. It seems to be running on an amazon cloud compute
&
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 01:01:16PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> +1 here
>
> kevin
Thanks! All done and running.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an e
Hey all,
I'm seeking a FBR to enable a new taskotron check in production.
It's not urgent (nothing will be blocked without it). It would just
be nice to have. Tim Flink says in channel that "it's not a risky or
major change". Backing it out would involve reverting that
conditional in trigger_r
Hi all,
I'd like to update:
- PDC to python-pdc-1.2.0-8.git.30.gacf661f (f25-infra) on pdc-web0*
- pdc-updater to pdc-updater-0.5.4-1 (epel7-infra) on pdc-backend0*
There are two changes that come with this:
- First, there is a new field in the productmd information produced by
pungi which PD
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:11:14PM -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 16:58 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases/tag/2.4.0
>
> I've been unable to build Bodhi in Rawhide, due to a packaging bug with
> python-dogpile-cache:
>
> https://bugzi
FYI, there's an upgrade to Bugzilla 5 in the works. There's no exact
date yet, but it looks like March is the current target. It occurs to
me that we'll be in F26 Alpha freeze then, so it may be good to try
and figure out what adjustments need to be made before then.
This was brought to my atten
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 10:51:08AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings and happy new year to everyone.
>
> I'd like to divide this email up into 2 parts:
>
> Firstly, what all do we want to get done in the next 2 months?
> The end of Feb is the end of the Red Hat Fiscal year and many of us
>
This release primarily contains Patricks' bugfix, found this morning.
0.18.1
--
Pull Requests
- (@ralphbean) #390, Drop old testcases against old python-six.
https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/pull/390
- (@puiterwijk) #393, Only check for stomp messages after we decoded any
Z
Hi all,
I've cut a new release of fedmsg upstream and will be packaging it for Fedora
and EPEL.
There's nothing in this release that needs to be rolled out in the infra
environment imminently. This email is just to let you know that the release if
available for when we next do mass updates.
0.
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 12:46:48PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:25:45PM -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:04:38PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 09:18:43AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:04:38PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 09:18:43AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > This is likely also https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/4022
> > Perhaps I should close that one UPSTREAM?
> > (I have no idea if it still needs fixing)
>
+1 here
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 12:13:50PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On martes, 1 de noviembre de 2016 12:51:28 PM CDT Chenxiong Qi wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 11:20 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > On jueves, 13 de octubre de 2016 2:35:59 PM CDT Pierre-Yves Chibon
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > O
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:13:35PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 10:07 +0530, Trishna Guha wrote:
> > It would be nice if you could link to a guide on how to test Bodhi on
> > staging so that I can jump in :).
>
> Unfortunately I don't think such a guide has been written. I mo
Hey all,
A new release of pdc-updater is out. There are a few bug fixes in place.
PR#15 adds wholly new functionality to start modelling our dependency chain in
PDC. For more information see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ralph/Drafts/Infrastructure/Factory2/ModellingDeps
I'll be deployi
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 02:53:45PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Sep 2016 16:01:23 +0100
> Clement Verna wrote:
> > Sorry if I bring confusion, but I though that the freeze was over. I
> > believe Kevin sent an email about this earlier this week.
>
> We are not in freeze. ;)
>
> We le
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:14:57PM -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is my first time submitting a patch to a repo or during a freeze
> break - if I missed a step or did something wrong, feel free to correct
> me. :) I didn't see a SOP in infra-docs so I just followed the format of
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:41:37PM +1000, Will Thames wrote:
>
> On 2 Sep 2016, at 18:38, Justin W. Flory wrote:
>
> > Hi Will,
> >
> > On 09/02/2016 03:15 AM, Will Thames wrote:
> >> I hope the below code review is ok. I have a lot of experience with
> >> Ansible, but not much experience with
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 06:12:35PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> As part of his Google Summer of Code Vivek Anand has been working on adjusting
> pagure so that it would fit our needs to run it on the top of distgit.
>
> All the changes have been merged now and our
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 04:58:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> - (@pypingou) #76, Redesign the architecture of fmn.consumer
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/fmn.consumer/pull/76
This is great. Thanks Pierre :)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 04:27:59PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I've completed the upgrade of zodbot to limnoria.
https://github.com/ProgVal/Limnoria
Awesome!
Thanks Kevin. :)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list
I see that someone reorganized the demo videos on our fedorapeople space.
They're in this dir now:
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/modularity/sprint-5-demo/
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproj
Hey all,
The Modularity Working Group[1] is doing the "sprint" thing to
organize work. We just completed a sprint, and have some demo videos
up. The full list will be on youtube[2] later today, but we stage them
on fedorapeople.org[3].
I wanted to point out a wiki page where we've been trying to
0.17.4
--
Pull Requests
- (@ralphbean) #375, Return the package associated with a bz update.
https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg_meta_fedora_infrastructure/pull/375
- (@AdamWill) #376, openQA: revise meta processor for pending new message
format
https://github.com/fedora-i
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 09:54:53AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I'd like to run:
>
> time ansible-playbook /srv/web/infra/ansible/master.yml -t
> fedmsgdconfig,fedmsgmonitor
>
> ie, the fedmsgdconfig and fedmsgmonitor tags over all hosts.
>
> The reason is that we added a new f
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:03:58PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> It should cut the list of failed update of ~200 projects :)
Nice! :)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 10:28:54AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 17:39:27 -0400
> Zach Villers wrote:
>
> > Hello infra,
> >
> > First apologies for blowing up your inbox with ansible commits.
> >
> > Second - if you have a chance, please log into these machines before
> > thur
0.7.3
-
Pull Requests
- (@phracek)#108, Fixes #107: Detect if file exists or is not empty
https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/pull/108
- (@ralphbean) #109, Correct another instance of mis-used six.iteritems().
https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/pull/
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 02:17:33PM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote:
> The fedora-packages webapp currently doesn't cache bugzilla
> information because it needs a fedmsg event to invalidate the cache --
> but now we have one!
A patch for this is here now:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/f
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:33:16AM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote:
> There's a Bugzilla outage scheduled for 00:00 2016-03-29 UTC.
>
> If everything goes to plan, bugzilla should start transmitting
> messages about changes to bug tickets shortly after this outage is
> complete.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 08:05:29AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> It seems that somehow our buildvmhost-10/11/12 machines are not
> currently properly multipathed to the iscsi on the netapp.
>
> Normally, multipath means there's a number of ways to reach the iscsi
> lun and the mach
There's a Bugzilla outage scheduled for 00:00 2016-03-29 UTC.
If everything goes to plan, bugzilla should start transmitting
messages about changes to bug tickets shortly after this outage is
complete. We have a mediator service running and ready that should
receive those and rebroadcast them to
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:11:49PM +0530, Kushal Das wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am applying for a freeze break request for Autocloud project. We need
> to be able to get koji build state changes from fedmsg so that we can
> test F24, and rawhide Cloud/Atomic builds. The following [1] hotfix patch is
>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 09:31:57AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Sadly, while this change fixes new fedpkg/pyrpkg, it breaks old fedpkg.
>
> I have reverted it for now and Ralph and Pingou are looking for a
> better solution.
It was fun. We read the C code for git-daemon and ultimately resolved
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 04:38:40PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> It seems there is a fedpkg/pyrpgk update that depends on using the
> namespaced (/rpms/) git checkouts.
>
> I'd like to apply the following to pkgs02:
>
> diff --git a/inventory/group_vars/pkgs b/inventory/group_vars
We currently use a fedmsg-driven daemon to update PDC about stuff that
gets composed by pungi.
This patch turns on a new layer that lets PDC publish its own messages
when it gets updated (the software comes with fedmsg as one of four
different message-publication methods it can use, which is cool!
This has been applied and is being pushed out.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:21:52AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I was going to wait until after freeze to mess with the other
> postgresql hosts, but then mattdm pointed out this morning that
> hyperkitty is really slow currently. I'm not sure this will help, but
> it really make db
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:22:29PM +0100, Robert Mayr wrote:
> Ok this is for staging websites, but it's a change in ansible and we change
> some pre_tasks, so I ask for +1s to be sure.
>
> Staging websites should not redirect prerelease pages, but show them
> normally (while production must still
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 11:23:01AM -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:26:49AM -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:21:20PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > To keep people motivated and involved, we will do a short (<15minutes)
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 04:56:15PM -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
> We want openqa01 to publish to the fedmsg bus (adamw's project) for some
> integrations that releng/qa are working on for the release.
>
> The patch below does two things:
>
> - It whitelists the ip for openqa0
We want openqa01 to publish to the fedmsg bus (adamw's project) for some
integrations that releng/qa are working on for the release.
The patch below does two things:
- It whitelists the ip for openqa01 on the inbound fedmsg relay. We need this
since openqa01 is in the qa net, so it has to jump
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 05:29:29PM -0500, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > Pagure can send message with the topic: pagure.request.assigned.added but
> > this
> > is currently not allowed so we get an `invalid signature` error.
> >
> > Could I get a couple of +1s to pu
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:08:58PM +0100, Robert Mayr wrote:
> Recently the websites repository switched from fedorahosted to pagure and
> we want to build websites now from there also for production.
> Actually the websites in staging are built from pagure and we don't have
> any issues so far. In
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:42:19PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I pushed some redirects out for the websites folks yesterday before
> freeze, but they aren't working right.
>
> I'd like to restart httpd on all the proxies to pick up these current
> changes.
>
> ie,
>
> ansible -a 'systemctl res
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:26:49AM -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:21:20PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > To keep people motivated and involved, we will do a short (<15minutes)
> > daily-meetup on #fedora-admin at 16:00 UTC.
> > Feel free to joi
Thanks all! This has been applied.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
1 - 100 of 338 matches
Mail list logo
