On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 11:18, Timothée Floure
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Took a bit more time than expected due to other and more local
> priorities on my side. The basic structure is there and usable, and
> indexing seemed work quite well before CommunityShift (hence yacy) went
> down.
>
> * Main
Hi,
Took a bit more time than expected due to other and more local
priorities on my side. The basic structure is there and usable, and
indexing seemed work quite well before CommunityShift (hence yacy) went
down.
* Main page: https://fnux.ch/fedpkg/public_html/
* Crawler entrypoin
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 01:39:47PM +0200, Timothée Floure wrote:
> I still need to handle a few cases (e.g. subpackages) but everything
> looks good so far. Generating the whole static website is quite fast
> (minutes including repository metadata sync, seconds otherwise).
>
> Screenshot attached
I started to work here: https://pagure.io/fedora-packages-static/tree/master
I'll update you once I get something usable.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 08:58, Timothée Floure
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > How does the indexing works ?
>
> You point Yacy to a domain or list of URLs
> (https://fnux.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ in this case), and it takes care of
> everything. There is also an advanced crawler panel in the UI allowing
> you to
Hi,
> How does the indexing works ?
You point Yacy to a domain or list of URLs
(https://fnux.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ in this case), and it takes care of
everything. There is also an advanced crawler panel in the UI allowing
you to filter content (e.g. HTML classes) from pages, which would be
usefu
On 4/1/20 4:13 PM, Timothée Floure wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jumping in since I saw this at the top of the web list archive. This
> service is very convenient and I think it would be fairly painful for
> the community to see it disappear. Since we do not have the capacity to
> develop + maintain new softwar
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 09:18, Timothée Floure
wrote:
> * Yacy (there might be others to test) running on communityshift:
> http://yacysearchserver-pkgs-playground.apps.os.fedorainfracloud.org
> * It's indexed against the 20 first PDC packages:
> https://fnux.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/
>
> * Example lo
* Yacy (there might be others to test) running on communityshift:
http://yacysearchserver-pkgs-playground.apps.os.fedorainfracloud.org
* It's indexed against the 20 first PDC packages:
https://fnux.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/
* Example looking for 'disk encryption':
http://yacysearchserver-pkgs-play
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 23:20, Timothée Floure
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jumping in since I saw this at the top of the web list archive. This
> service is very convenient and I think it would be fairly painful for
> the community to see it disappear. Since we do not have the capacity to
> develop + maintain
Hi,
Jumping in since I saw this at the top of the web list archive. This
service is very convenient and I think it would be fairly painful for
the community to see it disappear. Since we do not have the capacity to
develop + maintain new software, I wonder if the following 'low-tech'
approach coul
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 14:00, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 28. 03. 20 v 1:09 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > Hey, any news on this? I guess the problem is as always time.
> >
> > How far along is it? Could we run a demo/dev version in communishift?
>
> Yes. Time :(
> I have this as huge debt. I will tr
Dne 28. 03. 20 v 1:09 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> Hey, any news on this? I guess the problem is as always time.
>
> How far along is it? Could we run a demo/dev version in communishift?
Yes. Time :(
I have this as huge debt. I will try to prepare something.
But still I have "just" the page which sh
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 10:15:43AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 21. 11. 19 v 23:54 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > I hope we can run it in openshift?
>
> Yes. No problem with that.
Hey, any news on this? I guess the problem is as always time.
How far along is it? Could we run a demo/dev version
Dne 21. 11. 19 v 23:54 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> I hope we can run it in openshift?
Yes. No problem with that.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 09:15:40AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 25. 10. 19 v 20:44 Randy Barlow napsal(a):
> > > There appears to be work starting on a brand new implementation:
> > > https://github.com/xsuchy/fedora-packages-ng
> > >
> > > This version looks like it'll be Python 3 compatibl
Dne 25. 10. 19 v 20:44 Randy Barlow napsal(a):
There appears to be work starting on a brand new implementation:
https://github.com/xsuchy/fedora-packages-ng
This version looks like it'll be Python 3 compatible, though it is
quite new.
We can keep it in mind, thanks for sharing!
Yes. Give me f
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019, 21:42 Randy Barlow
wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 14:53 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > It's not a bad feature to have in fedpkg, but it fundamentally does
> > not help *other people* discover what we have in the distribution.
>
> Yeah I've discussed this a bit with some people
On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 15:50 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> a lot of Fedora-specific information isn't
> present.
Though true for the entire packages app, I think this site does do the
one use case I described at a quick glance.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_
On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 14:53 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It's not a bad feature to have in fedpkg, but it fundamentally does
> not help *other people* discover what we have in the distribution.
Yeah I've discussed this a bit with some people, and I agree. Fedora
*users* might use the packages app t
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 3:48 PM Clement Verna wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019, 21:42 Randy Barlow wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 14:53 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> > It's not a bad feature to have in fedpkg, but it fundamentally does
>> > not help *other people* discover what we have in th
On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 21:00 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> I am planning to deploy Package Version Matrix in communishift [1].
> Example how it can look like: [2]
>
> [1] https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8314
> [2] https://koji.kjnet.xyz/kojifiles/versions/
Oh that could be a good
On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 21:47 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> https://pkgs.org/ might be a good replacement for that. Does anybody
> have used or is using this website ? Any feedback on it ?
I haven't seen this before, but if it does a good job staying up to
date then it seems like a good replacement
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 8:43 PM Randy Barlow
wrote:
> OK. Given our extreme time constraints, I think it is likely that we
> will have to retire the Packages app.
>
> However, there is one feature in it that I personally believe does map
> to the CPE team's mission statement: the table of which ve
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 02:42:51PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-10-24 at 20:12 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> > The packages app (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/) was
> > originally running on RHEL6, I tried to move it to RHEL 7 but they
> > were some dependencies missing there
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:43 PM Randy Barlow
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2019-10-24 at 20:12 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> > The packages app (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/) was
> > originally running on RHEL6, I tried to move it to RHEL 7 but they
> > were some dependencies missing there so we
On Thu, 2019-10-24 at 14:33 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> There appears to be work starting on a brand new implementation:
> https://github.com/xsuchy/fedora-packages-ng
>
> This version looks like it'll be Python 3 compatible, though it is
> quite new.
We can keep it in mind, thanks for sharing!
On Thu, 2019-10-24 at 20:12 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> The packages app (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/) was
> originally running on RHEL6, I tried to move it to RHEL 7 but they
> were some dependencies missing there so we decided to move it to
> Fedora. I don't remember which dependen
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 2:13 PM Clement Verna wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 18:07, Randy Barlow
> wrote:
>>
>> Greetings!
>>
>> The packages app is running on Fedora 30, and its dependencies are not
>> available in Fedora 31+ as I understand it.
>>
>> This means it has about 7 months bef
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 18:07, Randy Barlow
wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> The packages app is running on Fedora 30, and its dependencies are not
> available in Fedora 31+ as I understand it.
>
> This means it has about 7 months before we need to do something about
> it, or shut it off.
>
> Do we know if
Greetings!
The packages app is running on Fedora 30, and its dependencies are not
available in Fedora 31+ as I understand it.
This means it has about 7 months before we need to do something about
it, or shut it off.
Do we know if it can run on RHEL 7?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digit
31 matches
Mail list logo
