Since, in a sense, this is targetted at me to be the lab rat for this, I
will read all this over carefully to see what mess I am getting myself
into, :)
Bob
On 11/10/22 07:45, Bob Hinden wrote:
Don,
Adding a procedure describing how to obtain an Ethertype for IETF work seems
reasonable
Hi,
Yes, Eric has retired - really retired We always hope to see a good
friend/colleague once again, possibly with a different hat. IAB's Liaison
Coordinators (Wes, Tommy, me) have been in discussions with Russ (IEEE Liaison)
on having an IEEE802.1 replacement. As we all know, it is an
Hi all,
Thanks a lot to Luigi Ioannone for helping with the notes!
The minutes are now posted. Please take a look and let us know if you have any
comments:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-115-intarea/
Best,
Juan-Carlos & Wassim
(IntArea WG chairs)
During the INTAREA WG meeting yesterday, there was a desire expressed
to include in the rfc7042bis draft an explicit process, from the IETF
side, for applying to the IEEE Registration Authority for an Ethertype
assignment. This seems pretty reasonable. The rfc7042bis draft does
include the IESG
Don,
Adding a procedure describing how to obtain an Ethertype for IETF work seems
reasonable to me as well.
Bob
> On Nov 10, 2022, at 12:24 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>
> During the INTAREA WG meeting yesterday, there was a desire expressed
> to include in the rfc7042bis draft an explicit
Got dinner plans. :(
Only one kosher restaraunt in the area.
On 11/10/22 03:17, Luigi IANNONE wrote:
Hi All,
Hope you are having a great IETF week.
Just a small reminder for those that are interested in talking about
addressing, let’s meet 18h30 this evening @ registration desk.
Ciao
+1
(co-chair hat off)
Thanks,
Wassim H.
On 11/10/22, 12:45 PM, "Int-area" wrote:
Don,
Adding a procedure describing how to obtain an Ethertype for IETF work seems
reasonable to me as well.
Bob
> On Nov 10, 2022, at 12:24 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>
> During the INTAREA WG meeting
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 8:34 AM Templin (US), Fred L
wrote:
>
> Tom, IP parcels have a very significant difference from the GSO/GRO and
> others you mentioned
> in that IP parcels allow a *single* packet to contain *multiple* upper layer
> protocol segments;
> in all of the other schemes you
Hi Haoyu - I appreciate your qualifying your message as coming from a
researcher's
perspective, but the IETF is about engineering and IP parcels is about
engineering.
It is here and now and ready to go - it is not to be put on some research
back-burner
that maybe we come back to 20 years from
Eric, OMNI already has UDP port number but it also needs 1) an IP protocol
number,
2) an IEEE Ethernet EtherType and 3) an IPv6 ND option number. These are the
same
things SCHC is asking for (minus the IPv6 ND), and to hear Bob describe it
sounds like
for the same or very similar reasons. Which
Tom, IP parcels have a very significant difference from the GSO/GRO and others
you mentioned
in that IP parcels allow a *single* packet to contain *multiple* upper layer
protocol segments;
in all of the other schemes you cited, it is always a single ULP segment per
packet. This alone
As a researcher, I'd like to provide a suggestion. Given its potentially
profound impact to the Internet, I think the blind peer reviews for its design
and evaluation are needed in some top tier research conferences such as
SIGCOMM. If it is accepted by the research community, it'll also help
The discussion in the Web meeting when the room dropped out seemed to agree
that it would be good to have an IETF mailing list for continuing this
discussion.
This should be easy to arrange.
Grüße, Carsten
Sharon Z דלתא
To
Everyone
6:59:42 PM
can you start an ebpf-ietf mailing list in
Tom, let me say another word about "research" continuing on from the previous
post.
Large packet research really began in the 1980's with FDDI, which is where we
got the
artificial 9KB limit we are experiencing with modern Ethernet. The FDDI
research proved
that ~9KB was the safety limit above
Hi All,
Hope you are having a great IETF week.
Just a small reminder for those that are interested in talking about
addressing, let’s meet 18h30 this evening @ registration desk.
Ciao
L.
From: Luigi IANNONE
Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2022 16:24
To: 'Luigi Iannone' ; int-area
Subject: RE:
15 matches
Mail list logo
