Folks,
+1
On 15/8/19 20:45, Ron Bonica wrote:
> Joe,
>
> I am fine with this text if everybody else is.
>
> Ron
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Touch
> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 10:21 AM
> To: Ron
Joel,
> On Aug 15, 2019, at 7:00 AM, Joel Halpern wrote:
>
> Bob was going to engage Alissa in a conversation. Bob, have you gotten
> anywhere? I think she may be on vacation.
I sent Alissa some proposed text, but got back what I interpreted as a vacation
email. I note there is an IESG
> On Aug 15, 2019, at 7:26 AM, Ron Bonica wrote:
>
> Joe,
>
> All things are fragile. That's one of life's realities.
>
> But some things are more fragile than others.
Sure, but what is the measure of “more”, esp. vs how many other features are
fragile and break *all* communication?
Joe,
All things are fragile. That's one of life's realities.
But some things are more fragile than others.
Ron
Juniper Business Use Only
-Original Message-
From: Joe Touch
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 10:21 AM
To: Ron
Well, there’s the tautology that “it worked when it worked”.
Given that’s basically the rule that defines *everything* in the Internet, it’s
baffling we need to say it again here, but if we did, we could simply state:
“The Internet is a best-effort system and lacks a formal validation or
Bob was going to engage Alissa in a conversation. Bob, have you gotten
anywhere? I think she may be on vacation.
Yours,
Joel
-Original Message-
From: Ron Bonica
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 9:59 AM
To: Brian E Carpenter ; Alissa Cooper
; Tom Herbert
Cc: Joel Halpern ;
Folks,
Has anyone proposed text that:
a) satisfies Alissa's request
b) satisfies the WG
If not, do we believe that such text could possibly exist?
Ron
Juniper Business Use Only
-Original
