, 2018 11:55 PM
To: Luca Muscariello
Cc: int-area
Subject: Re: [Int-area] [DMM] New draft posted: Anchorless mobility management
through hICN (hICN-AMM): Deployment options
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Luca Muscariello
mailto:luca.muscarie...@gmail.com>> wrote:
As of now, we do not
As of now, we do not intend to standardise anything.
The intended status for this draft is informational as indicated.
The system described in the draft has actually been around for quite a
while at the IRTF.
It might appear of immense scope and novelty to you as you might not be
aware about the
IMHO, there's no such a thing as a wrong question. But you can always ask
another one.
And BTW, I answered already to one of the questions you redo. Yes, there
will be another draft on transport.
It is not ready but I can have a technical report right before the IETF
week and I might give a
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Luca Muscariello <
luca.muscarie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I answered to 3. Please dig into the reply for the full answer. In short
> it is no, it does not.
> And BTW, I am aware I'm not providing any analysis and that I'm not trying
> to resolve any big thing
> in
I answered to 3. Please dig into the reply for the full answer. In short it
is no, it does not.
And BTW, I am aware I'm not providing any analysis and that I'm not trying
to resolve any big thing
in an email thread discussion, I never said I was.
The objective is to answer to clarification
Luca,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 3:46 AM, Luca Muscariello <
luca.muscarie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> These solutions are not all isomorphic and comparison requires some
> careful taxonomy first.
> The -01 version of the draft Kalyani is taking care of will include that
> and will definitely help to
These solutions are not all isomorphic and comparison requires some careful
taxonomy first.
The -01 version of the draft Kalyani is taking care of will include that
and will definitely help to
compare things.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane
Let's
, a new
> >> transport protocol, and a new application API-- there's nothing minor
> >> about that!
> >>
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 4:33 PM Giovanna Carofiglio (gcarofig)
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >>
s, on network constraints, on
>> >> phase of
>> >> deployment/transition etc. one option may be preferrable over another
>> >> one
>> >> (and different ones may coexist).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> One of the described
que while hICN is talking about anchoress mobility.
> Did I get something wrong?
>
> Behcet
>
>> Giovanna
>> --
>> *From:* Int-area on behalf of Behcet
>> Sarikaya
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 20, 2018 4:18 PM
>> *To:* Luca Muscariello
>
he described deployment options also discusses combination of
> hICN
> >> and SRv6, without opposing one approach to the other, rather exploiting
> in
> >> the combination the advantages of both ones.
> >>
> >>
> >> Giovanna
> >>
> >> ____
proach to the other, rather exploiting in
>> the combination the advantages of both ones.
>>
>>
>> Giovanna
>>
>>
>> From: Int-area on behalf of Behcet Sarikaya
>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 4:18 PM
>> To: Lu
behalf of Behcet Sarikaya
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 20, 2018 4:18 PM
> *To:* Luca Muscariello
> *Cc:* Internet Area; Luca Muscariello (lumuscar); Tom Herbert; dmm
> *Subject:* Re: [Int-area] [DMM] New draft posted: Anchorless mobility
> management through hICN (hICN-AMM): Depl
* Int-area on behalf of Behcet Sarikaya
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 20, 2018 4:18 PM
> *To:* Luca Muscariello
> *Cc:* Internet Area; Luca Muscariello (lumuscar); Tom Herbert; dmm
> *Subject:* Re: [Int-area] [DMM] New draft posted: Anchorless mobility
> management through hICN (hICN-A
I wonder whether this conversation should happen in the intarea wg mailing
list
as the main draft was posted there in the first place. I don't know if
cross posting is welcome
but I take the risk.
Going back to the question, the transport changes are related to the
request/reply semantic
of the
15 matches
Mail list logo
